9/11: Not to mix with another 9/11 in 1973 in Chile. Also so many casualties, also controlled from abroad...
The official story is full of half truths too. If pilots could jump on the simulator and pull these off, I wouldn't be saying this.
This is cruise missile precision. The idea that the US would do this is insane. So is the idea that they would commit acts of terrorism to get a war going with Cuba.
Last edited by Backspin; 13-09-2021 at 12:56 AM.
^
So, real pilots couldn't pull it off in a simulator? But were somehow able to do it by the even more difficult method of remote control?
Of course pilots could do it with ease. The towers were almost the same width as an international airport runway. The hard bit was punching in the waypoint to get to NY.
GPS coordinates, auto pilot. Its all there.
Hand flying flunky pilot at 500 Knots ? Not a chance.
How did the terrorists so efficiently kill and dispose of the real pilots so that they weren't a nuisance to the flight too ??? I could post 3 other highjackings and they all resulted in a huge fight in the cockpit which effected the flight. In 911 ? The planes all flew perfectly straight.
Does this look like the path of 3 hijacked cockpits ? 3 double murders happened in these planes ? Smooth operators these terrorists.
I think the one that crashed in Pennsylvania had its flight path a little altered from a fight in the cockpit, don't you?
As for the others, it wouldn't be hard to come from behind and slash the throats of pilots who are strapped in and not expecting it.
You really are grasping at straws dumb dumb.
Post it.
Did they reenact 3 double murders in the cockpit ? And nobodies leg touched the control stick? Ah it was all on auto eh. Terrarists killed and disposed of the bodies and took control , without the flight being disturbed for one second.
I guess it's possible. Just very unlikely. Which is why I support a new criminal investigation into 9/11.
Last edited by Backspin; 13-09-2021 at 09:09 PM.
skiddy and google.
It's just not a good combination is it?
It was an interesting debate to join more than a decade ago.
Now?
PNAC and the Clean Break papers wanted a different middle east and PNAC even hoped for a "pearl harbor" event to make it happen — invasion of Iraq: Most of them later joined the Dubya Admin.
For those who believe the conspiracy theory that some arab boys hung around titty bars in florida while attending flight training classes for small planes — and then pulled off 911.
up.to.you
Clearly you have never been in the cockpit of a commercial aircraft and never been in a sim. It is also clear you also have no idea of the basic mechanics of flight. If you had then you would know that it is relatively easy to point a cleanly configured aircraft at a distant object and hit it at high speed. If the object is for you to survive as well then I'm afraid the odds are against you.
It is far simpler than landing stable, configured, and at the correct speed on a runway, especially if your intention is to walk away afterwards.
I no longer have access to a civil sim or I'd video the simplicity of hitting much smaller targets than the WTC.
How the hijackers gained access to a locked cockpit remains a mystery. The theory is that they obtained the key from the purser after killing him. If you have ever been in a 767 cockpit (or many others) then you'd know how awkward it would be to defend yourself from a knife attack whilst strapped to your seat. You need to drive the seat backwards to get yourself out and that isn't going to happen in time.
The Fedex incident you mentioned (Flight 705) was in a DC-10, which has a third crew member and even then they were lucky not to be overpowered by a single person. I imagine once the hijackers gained access to the cockpit the demise of both pilots was rather swift.
You're either very naïve or just a nutter...
Just as a matter of interest Troy, can a plane be remotely controlled with no souls on board?
Boeing applied for a patent on uninterruptible auto pilot in 2004. Yes 2004. But it obviously just shows that the technology or the idea to employ it is not crazy talk. its the exact same wording that whistleblower Dan Hanley uses.
Edit :
They have it :
The Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot is a system designed to take control of a commercial aircraft away from the pilot or flight crew in the event of a hijacking. If implemented, the system would allow the craft to automatically guide itself to a landing at a designated airstrip.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)