Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Nutter central..

Have you watched this one yet?

Better not - you'll shit your pants

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

On 9/11, they never found any bodies or debris at either the Pentagon "crash site" - or the Shanksville "crash site"

That's utter nonsense and/or deliberately trolling by giving misinformation.

There were many MANY pieces of body and bone found at both sites. They were simply fragmented....either shredded by the falling building or by impact into Pennsylvanian farmland.

If you say that no bodies or pieces were found, you are virtually stating that all the journalists and news stations, all police and forensic investigators were falsifying data.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

On 9/11, they never found any bodies or debris at either the Pentagon "crash site" - or the Shanksville "crash site"

That's because no plane crashed at either one.

Interesting. One new false flag operation shows the crucial flaws on the worlds biggest false flag.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

either shredded by the falling building

Which falling building? Whole bodies were found in the TT. So why should a few floors of pentagon be so bad

Originally Posted by Latindancer

impact into Pennsylvanian farmland.

....where as the impact of falling from a missile blown up plane from 10,000 feet would not be as bad.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

If you say that no bodies or pieces were found, you are virtually stating that all the journalists and news stations, all police and forensic investigators were falsifying data.

Yep that's what these guys are saying. They hate the USA so much that no lie goes untold.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by Latindancer

They were simply fragmented.... shredded by impact into Pennsylvanian farmland.

....where as the impact of falling from a missile blown up plane from 10,000 feet would not be as bad.

How's your grasp of basic physics, Pseudolus ? A body can fall from an aircraft at 10,000 ft and not look too bad after it hits.

A body inside a plane flown head-on into the ground gets shredded into tiny pieces.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by Latindancer

They were simply fragmented.... shredded by impact into Pennsylvanian farmland.

....where as the impact of falling from a missile blown up plane from 10,000 feet would not be as bad.

How's your grasp of basic physics, Pseudolus ? A body can fall from an aircraft at 10,000 ft and not look too bad after it hits.

A body inside a plane flown head-on into the ground gets shredded into tiny pieces.

Don't know, but from memory, Mount Erebus, plane hit a mountain, at speed. They found bodies, as they say, it's not the fall that kills you, it's the sudden stop. Jim

Originally Posted by Latindancer

There were many MANY pieces of body and bone found at both sites.

LD please show your source of information please.

Flight 93 weighed 127 tons when it crashed, according to New York Times reporter and author Jere Longman. [5] And yet numerous individuals, including some of the first people to arrive on the scene, have described the lack of anything resembling plane wreckage at the alleged crash site. Assistant Fire Chief Rick King, who drove the first fire truck to reach the site, recalled thinking when he arrived: "Where is this plane? And where are the people?" King saw "thousands of tiny pieces scattered around--bits of metal, insulation, wiring--but no fuselage, no wings, only a smoking crater and charred earth." [6] He sent his men into the woods to search for the fuselage, but they kept coming back and telling him, "Rick, there's nothing." [7]
Homer Barron, who also arrived shortly after the crash, has recalled, "It didn't look like a plane crash, because there was nothing that looked like a plane." He added: "I [have] never seen anything like it. Just like a big pile of charcoal." [8]
Jon Meyer, the first reporter on the scene, said he was "able to get right up to the edge of the crater" where Flight 93 supposedly hit the ground. However, he described: "All I saw was a crater filled with small, charred plane parts. Nothing that would even tell you that it was the plane. ... There were no suitcases, no recognizable plane parts, no body parts." [9] Local coroner Wallace Miller, who was also one of the first people to arrive, said the crater looked "like someone took a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch, and dumped all this trash into it."

Shanksville, Pennsylvania, on 9/11: The Mysterious Plane Crash Site Without a Plane | 911Blogger.com

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Nutter central..

Have you watched this one yet?

Better not - you'll shit your pants

I can only take so much comedy in my life, then reality sets in again.. I'm unable to immerse my life in such nonsensical tripe as those like you since mine is based in reality not fantasy..

Originally Posted by Lancelot

Originally Posted by Latindancer

If you say that no bodies or pieces were found, you are virtually stating that all the journalists and news stations, all police and forensic investigators were falsifying data.

Yep that's what these guys are saying. They hate the USA so much that no lie goes untold.

It's so tiring going around in circles with nutters like this who have no clue of what happens to a body in a burning inferno which also includes impact damage, and so many other factors they just throw aside because it shows them to be ignorant in their staunch perspective that I just refuse to even entertain them anymore. It's such a lost cause trying to bring their education levels up to the standard of even an elementary child with the slightest bit of common sense that it bores me to tears and makes my head pound, so my response now is just to laugh..

Originally Posted by jamescollister

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by Latindancer

They were simply fragmented.... shredded by impact into Pennsylvanian farmland.

....where as the impact of falling from a missile blown up plane from 10,000 feet would not be as bad.

How's your grasp of basic physics, Pseudolus ? A body can fall from an aircraft at 10,000 ft and not look too bad after it hits.

A body inside a plane flown head-on into the ground gets shredded into tiny pieces.

Don't know, but from memory, Mount Erebus, plane hit a mountain, at speed. They found bodies, as they say, it's not the fall that kills you, it's the sudden stop. Jim

Wasn't straight into it, a diving plane picks up speed, it's not cruising anymore and this plane was also accelerating intentionally according to the flight recorders, by the terrorists, wasn't a flaming inferno with the bodies contained inside as the planes that hit the towers were.. That's my last response on the topic..

Our resident looney tunes idiots can't tell the difference in the physics between flying into something at 500+ mph and descending into the ground at terminal velocity which is downwards of 200MPH.

That's because they are thick.

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

It's so tiring going around in circles with nutters like this who have no clue of what happens to a body in a burning inferno which also includes impact damage, and so many other factors they just throw aside because it shows them to be ignorant in their staunch perspective that I just refuse to even entertain them anymore. It's such a lost cause trying to bring their education levels up to the standard of even an elementary child with the slightest bit of common sense that it bores me to tears and makes my head pound, so my response now is just to laugh..

My thoughts exactly.


And I'd say that flight 93 was probably going faster than 200 mph. Plus it must have gone close to vertically into the ground. Not many planes do that when they crash.

So, Harrysarseislooser, Mincing Prancer and Floriduh, you guys reckon a small office fire caused this collapse?

You guys can't even change a lightbulb can you

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

So, Harrysarseislooser, Mincing Prancer and Floriduh, you guys reckon a small office fire caused this collapse?

You guys can't even change a lightbulb can you

Ok so now Shagsnastier ladyboys gets personal?? Cause he can't win the debate based on reasonable facts.. Completely predictable and laughable....

^Just answer the question.

You think an office fire caused that?

How long does it take your fvcking brain to turn over?
Yes or no?

Since you have demonstreated once agasin your lack of comprehension I'll quote it for you again.

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

That's my last response on the topic..

And before you make another stupid attempt to claim these last 2 posts were responses, they aren't "on the topic" just responses to your personal remarks.. No more...

^So you can't answer the question then?

As I thought.

Here - take the poll

https://teakdoor.com/the-teakdoor-lou...cs-a-poll.html

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

So, Harrysarseislooser, Mincing Prancer and Floriduh, you guys reckon a small office fire caused this collapse?

You guys can't even change a lightbulb can you

The only people under the delusion that this was a small office fire or explosives are tin foil loonies like yourself.

The firemen on the ground who watched it burn all day and predicted that it would eventually collapse know a little bit more about firefighting than you do.

But don't let that stop you spouting bollocks eh?

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

^So you can't answer the question then?

As I thought.

Here - take the poll

https://teakdoor.com/the-teakdoor-lou...cs-a-poll.html

I see you have problems understanding the difference between the words "can't" and 'won't' as well..

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The firemen on the ground who watched it burn all day and predicted that it would eventually collapse know a little bit more about firefighting than you do.

This is the bottom line, and a well-documented fact. Which is why anyone who focuses, Asperger-like, on suspecting it was demolished (which flies in the face of established facts like that above), needs to be told what nutcases they are and to just shut up.

It is well-known that the firemen heard loud noises _like_ explosions, but to say they WERE explosions is reading in too much. They were there for hours, witnessing it all and speculating on exactly how and when it might collapse.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The firemen on the ground who watched it burn all day and predicted that it would eventually collapse know a little bit more about firefighting than you do.

This is the bottom line, and a well-documented fact. Which is why anyone who focuses, Asperger-like, on suspecting it was demolished (which flies in the face of established facts like that above), needs to be told what nutcases they are and to just shut up.

It is well-known that the firemen heard loud noises _like_ explosions, but to say they WERE explosions is reading in too much. They were there for hours, witnessing it all and speculating on exactly how and when it might collapse.

Oh these tossers won't let a load of witness evidence from the rescue services on the site, and a 20-storey hole in the building that was burning all day, interfere with their weird little conspiracy tale.

Tin foil hats and strong medication have that effect.