Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

He says it himself: He had to ask someone how you get data off one.

In 'Speakers-Corner' aren't you supposed to provide a link when quoting someone?

Originally Posted by Latindancer

So what is this Dennis Cimino guy actually saying ? Can you sum it up, Pragmatic ?

You haven't watched the video have you?

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

In 'Speakers-Corner' aren't you supposed to provide a link when quoting someone?

Someshittyyoutubevideothatsomeothercuntposted.com

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Someshittyyoutubevideothatsomeothercuntposted.com

Nah. Comes up as nothing. Try again please.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Someshittyyoutubevideothatsomeothercuntposted.com

Nah. Comes up as nothing. Try again please. Here's a simple question Hairy. Why does the black box recovered at the Pentagon show that the cabin door was never used at the time the terrorists were supposed to have hijacked the plane. Whilst yer at it can you explain how it is supposedly possible to overpower the pilots and take over the flight controls in a space of only 3 minutes when only armed with box cutters?

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

You haven't watched the video have you?

I started to, but his rambling manner was painful. Why should I spend 45 minutes of my life listening to some inarticulate clod babble ?

Albert Shagnasty used to post really long vids and then criticize people who didn't watch em.

Why can't you sum it up ?

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Why can't you sum it up ?

Okay. The conclusion was that the black box found was not from the commercial plane allegedly believed to have hit the Pentagon. The plane on radar and the info on the black box was identified to not being commercial but a military craft. The same as some eyewitnesses stated.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Nah. Comes up as nothing. Try again please.

remove the s from https, that works with youtube

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

how it is supposedly possible to overpower the pilots and take over the flight controls in a space of only 3 minutes when only armed with box cutters?

And when they can barely fly a Cessna, and then do a gentle turn-around and navigate....etc etc.
Ground effect.
Direction the black box said vs the damage and fallen power poles.

The irony about people that say that 9/11 conspiracy theorists are tin-foil hat wearers, is that they themselves are actually the gullible conspiracy theorists in that they are promoting an incredible and unlikely scenario.

Originally Posted by Maanaam

and then do a gentle turn-around and navigate

Plus when taking over the flight controls they would have no indication as to their location in relation to the Pentagon.

They did have some training, and with more than Cessnas.

Come up with something definite and we'll talk turkey.

8388 posts and you've seen nothing definite/conclusive? You and Hairy must be 'one in the same'?

Perhaps you could point out which of the evidence you deem to be definite or conclusive ??

LD, you're havin a laarrrffff.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Nah. Comes up as nothing. Try again please. Here's a simple question Hairy. Why does the black box recovered at the Pentagon show that the cabin door was never used at the time the terrorists were supposed to have hijacked the plane. Whilst yer at it can you explain how it is supposedly possible to overpower the pilots and take over the flight controls in a space of only 3 minutes when only armed with box cutters?

First:

Since the FDR was using data frame 757-3, the FDR was newer than the plane, equipped to record the cockpit door parameter when available, but was also backwards compatible so that it could be installed in older models, such as the AA77 plane, which didn't have the cockpit door sensor.

The FDR had 41 hours of data going back over 11 flights, and it didn't show the cockpit door opening once. You think the same pilots flew 11 flights in 41 hours without even taking piss?



Second: I want you to turn off the TV and your monitor and sit there and do absolutely nothing for three whole minutes.

What sort of dumb question is that?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

which didn't have the cockpit door sensor.
The FDR had 41 hours of data going back over 11 flights, and it didn't show the cockpit door opening once. You think the same pilots flew 11 flights in 41 hours without even taking piss?

Fair and convincing rebuttal of one point.

I repeat. The plane that allegedly hit the Pentagon didn't.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

I repeat. The plane that allegedly hit the Pentagon didn't.

You can repeat it as much as you fucking like, it's still horseshit.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

You can repeat it as much as you fucking like

You're all heart Hairy.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

You're all heart Hairy.

I gave you the perfect example of something that proves what you believe is a crock of fucking shit, but you won't accept it. That's what whackjobs do, it's called "Confirmation Bias".

You'll be telling some other poor fucker in a pub one night that the "Flight Data Recorder showed the door never opened!" and you'll never be able to admit you're wrong. That the truth is that there wasn't a door sensor, as evidenced by the other 11 flights on the same recorder, something you never ever bothered to check and which was probably conveniently ignored on the cretinous whackjob sites where you get this bollocks.

This is all you crackpots do, you read some half arsed shite on the interwebs, you never bother checking it and you spout it as if it's fact.

I'm not here to convert you, simply to point out that you're a dozy fucker if you keep believing all this interwebs nonsense instead of the actual evidence.

Now go back to your spastic youtube videos showed deranged lunatics squealing absurd conspiracy theories, there's a good whackjob.

You proved fcuk all Hairy. Your info was obtained in the same manner as I obtained mine but because it's differs from your beliefs my info is all bollix. Fair go Hairy, think what you want but 'you are wrong'.

Flight data recorder expert Dennis Cimino, commercial pilot with more than 2000 hours, reveals government's claims about a flight data recorder found at the Pentagon from Flight 77 are totally fraudulent, with zeros instead of the plane's identification number and flight number! The recorder did not come from an airliner but was apparently created at a workbench and was also missing data that an actual flight would have, such as mandatory barometric adjustments and even any record of the cockpit door opening.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

You proved fcuk all Hairy. Your info was obtained in the same manner as I obtained mine but because it's differs from your beliefs my info is all bollix. Fair go Hairy, think what you want but 'you are wrong'.

"Dennis the Moron".


It's an apt name.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Your info was obtained in the same manner as I obtained mine

One difference : Harry ran his information through a well-developed sense of proportion, as I did.

Lawyer's Committee for 9/11 Inquiry
https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/

David R. Meiswinkle and Mick Harrison from the Lawyers' Committee, Richard Gage from AE911Truth.org and Robert McIlvaine hold a press conference to discuss the Lawyers' Committee lawsuit against the FBI. The press conference took place March 25, 2019 in Washington D.C.

Awww, they could have provided some windows for them to lick.