Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by redhaze

Logical fallicy 101 right there

maybe you should read what logical fallacy means again

and if someone has an habit of lying, why would they tell the truth for something that important ?

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

harry, you are clueless as usual

from politics, to IT and even 911 theories

you believe in corporate fairy tales and Bush/Rumsfield version of the event after they were caught lying about Iraq WMD

how gullibe are you ?

Whatever you say, now you are an "IT Expert".

wrong again, I am a regedit expert

and you are still a Call Center boy

Whatever you say, "IT Expert".

your boss is calling

he is quite a handsome indian by your standard

Can't argue with the "IT expert".

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

A cruise missile or drone dressed up as a plane.

The eye witnesses on the ground described seeing planes that were obviously not airliners, so as you say, most likely planes that were flown by remote, i.e drones.

Yeah cool story bro... And all the eyewitnesses that saw, you know, planes?

There could be 10 eyewitnesses 9 of whom report one thing and the remaining one who reports another and you'll go with the one. Because confirmation bias. Because conspiracy whackjobs. Because sense of powerlessness and need to believe you have a sense of control in a world where sometimes bad shit just happens.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

A cruise missile or drone dressed up as a plane.

The eye witnesses on the ground described seeing planes that were obviously not airliners, so as you say, most likely planes that were flown by remote, i.e drones.

The only film footage of the first plane was caught by an amateur camera man filming a fire crew in the street, he panned his camera upwards quickly " Why " because he HEARD a plane flying low above him.
Listen to the footage and no doubt the sound of a plane flying is clearly heard.
It does not sound like a rocket or missile.

Originally Posted by wasabi

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

A cruise missile or drone dressed up as a plane.

The eye witnesses on the ground described seeing planes that were obviously not airliners, so as you say, most likely planes that were flown by remote, i.e drones.

The only film footage of the first plane was caught by an amateur camera man filming a fire crew in the street, he panned his camera upwards quickly " Why " because he HEARD a plane flying low above him.
Listen to the footage and no doubt the sound of a plane flying is clearly heard.
It does not sound like a rocket or missile.

It wasn't a rocket or missile.

Albert is just demented, gullible moron.

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

and if someone has an habit of lying, why would they tell the truth for something that important ?

Logical fallacy. Fallacy of presumption and ad ignorantiam fallacy

Originally Posted by wasabi

The only film footage of the first plane was caught by an amateur camera man...

Too bad that the cameras fixed outside exceptionally did not work. Or did work but somebody removed the tapes? Or what to believe?

The dancing jews filmed the event. http://21stcenturywire.com/2015/09/1...five-israelis/

Originally Posted by wasabi

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

A cruise missile or drone dressed up as a plane.

The eye witnesses on the ground described seeing planes that were obviously not airliners, so as you say, most likely planes that were flown by remote, i.e drones.

The only film footage of the first plane was caught by an amateur camera man filming a fire crew in the street, he panned his camera upwards quickly " Why " because he HEARD a plane flying low above him.
Listen to the footage and no doubt the sound of a plane flying is clearly heard.
It does not sound like a rocket or missile.

You're missing the point, it's not supposed to sound like a rocket or missile. Doesn't make sense to dress up a rocket/missile as a plane with pretty wings and tail and paint windows with scared faces peering through, only to give the game away by making it sound like a rocket/missile.

Still waiting to learn which rocket/missile could have been used to replicate the trajectory and damage to the Pentagon, and how it was launched and controlled; not by whom as that's obvious. The experts have convinced all but the really thick that 911 was an inside job, so I'm wondering why after 16 years they still haven't addressed this critical piece of rocket science.

Originally Posted by jabir

You're missing the point, it's not supposed to sound like a rocket or missile. Doesn't make sense to dress up a rocket/missile as a plane with pretty wings and tail and paint windows with scared faces peering through, only to give the game away by making it sound like a rocket/missile.

Originally Posted by jabir

Still waiting to learn which rocket/missile could have been used to replicate the trajectory and damage to the Pentagon, and how it was launched and controlled

Oh.... special missiles.

As special as the people who have suggested their use. Special-special.

Here's a seminal UAV

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tadiran_Mastiff

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017

Here's a seminal UAV

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tadiran_Mastiff

Yeah, 10 feet long, easily mistaken for a 757.

You witless twat.

That was designed and built almost 50 years ago.

They probably evolved a little in the 30 odd years before 9/11.

You utterly stupid cvnt.

The point is that most likely whatever type of planes hit the towers; they were flown remotely. Not by pilots.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017

That was designed and built almost 50 years ago.

They probably evolved a little in the 30 odd years before 9/11.

You utterly stupid cvnt.

The point is that most likely whatever type of planes hit the towers; they were flown remotely. Not by pilots.

Tell that to the pilots' families you fucking whackjob.

^
Go fvck yourself you western corporate cocksucker.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017

That was designed and built almost 50 years ago.

They probably evolved a little in the 30 odd years before 9/11.

You utterly stupid cvnt.

The point is that most likely whatever type of planes hit the towers; they were flown remotely. Not by pilots.

Doesn't make sense to fly them remotely, just makes it more complicated as the other variables are still the same. Anyway I read somewhere that they were holograms.

Perhaps in years to come someone will claim the towers were never there in the first place.

Originally Posted by jabir

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017

That was designed and built almost 50 years ago.

They probably evolved a little in the 30 odd years before 9/11.

You utterly stupid cvnt.

The point is that most likely whatever type of planes hit the towers; they were flown remotely. Not by pilots.

Doesn't make sense to fly them remotely, just makes it more complicated as the other variables are still the same. Anyway I read somewhere that they were holograms.

Perhaps in years to come someone will claim the towers were never there in the first place.

Haha Albert will be kicking himself that he never thought of that one!

Hey Albert, don't look now but your stupid is showing

^^^
So you think that getting a patsy who can barely fly a plane, to pull of a stunt that most seasoned pilots would suffer to do has the same chance of success as guiding a plane into the same target via gps remote?

What are you, a fvcking idiot or something?