Thread: Same sex marriage

Originally Posted by Slick

It isn't hate that makes people shake their head in disbelief when faced with a person that states in all seriousness there are 30 genders (or whatever) (for example).

Homo marriage? Yeah whatever. That stuff above? Lol wtf.

Well, that's a pretty random non sequitur.

Whatever next? Off-topic rants about abortion??

Oh wait no he's already done that.

Originally Posted by Slick

^^Dunno but your theory of evolutional process being the end of evolution is kinda weird.

That was Loopers prognosis not mine.
In case it had escaped your notice there are many other proven activities that are lowering populations, such as birth control and female education receiving support in 3rd world communities.

The human population will eventually slow down and may even reverse due to current trends like those mentioned.

I forgot to mention the population effects of your second amendment rights, and the US military industrial complex contributions to same.

^^^Still butthurt over that abortion post eh. Kinda funny really since it's literally your own position on it. Maybe if you bring it up another 100 times it'll somehow be my fault you're such a sucker.

Originally Posted by Slick

^^^Still butthurt over that abortion post eh. Kinda funny really since it's literally your own position on it. Maybe if you bring it up another 100 times it'll somehow be my fault you're such a sucker.

You're mistaking my bemusement over that bizarre rant specifically and amusement over your constant logic fails and inability to debate generally for 'butthurt' - all of which being related to your just not being very bright.

And no, it's literally not my position. I've got no idea what you're dribbling about but I'm certain it's not how you've portrayed it. Here. In this thread. Which has nothing to do with abortion.

Originally Posted by Switch

There has been no such suggestion. It is merely noted that an increase in homosexual relationships, whether by social acceptance or by DNA changes would act as a brake on population growth.
Females raising children have no idea whether their offspring will be homosexual or not. I'm sure those who do not turn out heterosexual receive the same level of support as any other children.
i am suggesting a credible option here, not arguing semantics. Are you in favour of engineering a response to counter a realistic, natural, evolutionary process.?

This disjointed cretinous bilge is barely worth replying to. There are so many competing failures to grasp the basics of evolution crammed into only 5 sentences it is almost impressive. Even the question at the end is premised on nonsense and only semi-coherent.

It is so poorly structured, foggy and muddled it actually makes my stomach hurt to try and pick it apart to attempt a response.... you are Chassamui aren't you!

Anyway here you go....

Evolution does not create adaptations for the purposes of limiting populations. Limiting populations is the exact opposite of what evolution does. Evolution only acts to increase the success of genes to replicate. Exclusive life-long homosexuality is a behaviour which severely inhibits a creature's ability to propagate its DNA to the next generation. It is almost certainly a developmental defect.

Originally Posted by Looper

disjointed cretinous bilge

Originally Posted by Looper

nonsense and only semi-coherent

Originally Posted by Looper

poorly structured, foggy and muddled

...you forgot leprous, malodorous and vile...555

Originally Posted by Switch

The human population will eventually slow down and may even reverse due to current trends like those mentioned.

The best thing that could happen to planet Earth would be that the Human population become infertile and eventually die out.

That would solve the Faggotry issue as well.

Originally Posted by terry57

The best thing that could happen to planet Earth would be that the Human population become infertile and eventually die out.

A particular branch of the human population. exterminated, would certainly be most beneficial to the earth -

^
Thats right Jeff,

Lets start with you and work backwards.

A brilliant start right there.

Originally Posted by Looper

Evolution does not create adaptations for the purposes of limiting populations. Limiting populations is the exact opposite of what evolution does. Evolution only acts to increase the success of genes to replicate. Exclusive life-long homosexuality is a behaviour which severely inhibits a creature's ability to propagate its DNA to the next generation. It is almost certainly a developmental defect.

Evolution has to create adaptations in order for species to survive. The lack of adaptations or poorly perceived ones, almost always deliver extinctions. Evolution is a regulatory procedure. It does not work in isolation. It often requires the interaction or failure of other species. Google Darwins Finches.
Please read and understand Darwin before you make a complete ass of yourself.

Originally Posted by Switch

Evolution has to create adaptations in order for species to survive. The lack of adaptations or poorly perceived ones, almost always deliver extinctions. Evolution is a regulatory procedure. It does not work in isolation. It often requires the interaction or failure of other species. Google Darwins Finches.
Please read and understand Darwin before you make a complete ass of yourself.

Rhubarb rhubarb random evolution dribbling. I have nothing to say but I want to have the last word.

Rhubard custard adaptations mustard. Apple crumble finches rumble rumble.

Jon Snow I know nothing I know nothing.

Apple crumble extinction procedures rumble rumble.

Brrrrrrrrrr. ftang ftang.

...just stamp your foot and hold your breath if you don't agree with Switch...

^ Actually in sort of the same vein, this post below from SK was in the Political Cartoon thread, but it may a half decent fit here also.

SSM is a polarising issue.

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

Originally Posted by David48atTD

SSM is such a polarising issue.

...there would be less polarization if Christians would just STFU...

Originally Posted by tomcat

...just stamp your foot and hold your breath if you don't agree with Switch...

It's very clear he can't debate him on the point.

Originally Posted by David48atTD

SSM is a polarising issue.

Originally Posted by tomcat

...there would be less polarization if Christians would just STFU...

TC, we both know this isn't a Religion based question.

But, if you wish to inject the Religious element into the discussion, the Islamic Faith might also a wee bit of difficulty
agreeing with SSM

Originally Posted by David48atTD

we both know this isn't a Religion based question

please feel free to speak for yourself...I know this is a religious issue and that includes traditions based on religious dogma. I include in my rants all religions that reject human rights for those they don't like...

Originally Posted by David48atTD

TC, we both know this isn't a Religion based question.

Originally Posted by tomcat

please feel free to speak for yourself...I know this is a religious issue and that includes traditions based on religious dogma.

Fair enough reply, but you've boxed yourself into a corner trying to align your argument along Religious lines.

According, if you are going to use that argument then only the Christian gays would be accepted into 'Marriage'

Originally Posted by David48atTD

TC, we both know this isn't a Religion based question.

But, if you wish to inject the Religious element into the discussion, the Islamic Faith might also a wee bit of difficulty
agreeing with SSM

It is not my intention to urinate on your hind quarters, and lead you to believe that precipitation might be the cause, but; I was recently a guest at an arranged Muslim wedding. The groom was openly gay and all concerned parties were aware of this. The couple were joined in the usual way with great public ceremony and much feasting.
The couple will carry on their lives much as before. She relieved of conjugal duties, and he providing grist to the evolutionary mill.
Religion does have a part to play, even if it is merely by feigned acknowledgement.

Storm in a teacup,WW3 could start anytime and people worry about SSM

Originally Posted by David48atTD

you've boxed yourself into a corner trying to align your argument along Religious lines

my argument is aligned along all lines of opinion, religion being only one, that refuse human rights to others: such lines would also include politics, rigid social customs and magical thinking...

Originally Posted by Switch

I was recently a guest at an arranged Muslim wedding. The groom was openly gay

a dear friend, a gay Saudi I've known for decades, was threatened with being disinherited unless he married a cousin. He did and managed (without a turkey baster) to produce a girl and a boy to satisfy mom...talk about perversion...