Fecks sake, the 3.0L turbo diesel Vigo has 343nm of torque when stock. The Camry 2.4l only has a meagre 161nm, with similar BHP figures!
No contest!
Fecks sake, the 3.0L turbo diesel Vigo has 343nm of torque when stock. The Camry 2.4l only has a meagre 161nm, with similar BHP figures!
No contest!
Wow, you're so cool Tuddy! Do you do burnouts to impress the girls?
...Actually, I'm surprised you showed your face in this thread, we all remember what happened last time you posted on a thread about Hondas.
You arsed on about how fast your pickup was then too? Do you remember what happened last time you posted about my Mercedes?
^
What year and model is it?
Do you have a New Zealand Law Society practising certificate?
(i feel like being nosey)
Last edited by Smeg; 26-08-2008 at 07:50 PM.
Actually I bet the Tudster drives around with the window down, arm on the sill, and music pumping from the stereo.
The Mercedes I presume? A 1988 280CE (coupe).
That is nosey. But no, not currently.Do you have a New Zealand Law Society practising certificate?
(i feel like being nosey)
Like this?
Didn't it go out of production in 1985? Mercedes-Benz W123 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia1988 280CE
Only 182 bhp. I bet the power to weight ratio is poorer than a new Jazz (120bhp)
A Jazz has three more doors. Much more convenient for a family
Last edited by Smeg; 26-08-2008 at 08:23 PM.
Ant, are you working in good old Bangers now?
Spot on, exactly like that (except mine's a different colour and has a sunroof )
True, no denying that. The back-seat in my car's only there for decoration. Would still struggle to fit my twin-terrors and assorted crap into a Jazz though. And mind you the Merc is only for a bit fun every now and then - got the family wagons to cram everyone into.A Jazz has three more doors. Much more convenient for a family
Nope, couldn't/wouldn't live there if I could help it. What's with all the q's?Ant, are you working in good old Bangers now?
Ok you got the torque & bhp figures.
Now be honest and post up a certifiable performance comparison chart.
Diesel engine is limited by RPM (Revolution Per Minute).
A diesel engine will always lack in acceleration and top end performance. Period.
But what it does have is midrange grunt. This is the part where the torque that you happily talk about come into play. Thus giving you the illusion that you are driving one fast motherfookin pickup. But soon as you hit 4,000 RPM you have to grab another gear and so on till you run out of gears usually fifth gear. Cars will continue to be in front. As it revs higher for longer. So a pickup like yours governed to say approx 4,500 RPM stuck in 5th gear as opposed to a car at 6,000 RPM in 5th gear. Which will be the one most likely to be travelling faster?
And as a gentle reminder the advertising slogan for Toyota in the past is "The car in front is a Toyota"! Not pickup.
^ valid point.
I will not allow the pickup driver waste any more of my time.
I just mentioned you made a complete and utter fool of yourself did I not?Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Only a dream for that engine nowadays, as I've stated many times before.Originally Posted by Smeg
Needs the engine equivalent of a hip replacement if it's ever going to see those heady days again!
And a Camry is something special???Originally Posted by Whiteshiva
It's a taxi FFS!
Not when highway driving which is what we're talking about. Torque is what matters, and the pick-up knocks the Camry into a cocked hat.Originally Posted by Travelmate
Mortals you defy the Gods, I sentence you to travel among unknown stars, until you find the Kingdom of Hades, your bodies will stay as lifeless as stone.
So you don't remember then. I'd get that looked at if I were you; diesal fumes might be affecting your short-term memory or something.
How many Camry taxi's have you seen?And a Camry is something special???
It's a taxi FFS!
Fact is it has more refinement and comfort than any pickup does.
Highway driving is even worst. You have no top end. C'mon now drop to your knees and give in, you are fighting a losing battle here.Originally Posted by EmperorTud
The pickup rests on a heavy chassis, the gearing are suited for lumping a heavy load, diesel engine are known only for their low to mid range torque at low speed. It is a basic work horse not a race horse.
Plenty, there's hundreds operate from Suvarnabhumi airport for starters.Originally Posted by AntRobertson
I'm not arguing that!Originally Posted by AntRobertson
The torque figures I gave earlier are at 4,000RPM which is more top end for a diesel pick-up. The Vigo redlines at a touch over 5,000RPM.Originally Posted by Travelmate
Hey Tud can your pick up do thisOriginally Posted by EmperorTud
My Ford Ranger does me just fine. Comfortable and has good pick up. However, I like the look of the Toyota!
Look. A CI (diesel) engine provides low to mid range torque. Not top end other wise you'll be driving around screaming the engine off all the time.Originally Posted by EmperorTud
Tell me, before you made a statement that you are in the automotive industry. Given your ramblings and incorrect statements. I have doubts that you are what you claim. Perhaps you are a valet car park attendant or something?
2nd hand car salesman from Glascow?Originally Posted by Travelmate
The figures I gave are correct for a 3.0L Vigo torque 343Nm from 1600 to 3200rpm with a maximum torque output at 4000RPM.
I don't care what you believe about me personally.
You believe a front wheel drive saloon with a less powerful engine and less torque can outrun a 3.0L pick-up on a highway with those sort of torque figures it is you that is talking out of your arse.
I've scolded you with facts and figures yet you've brought zero, zilch nada nothing to the table except your opinion.
You've probably never even driven a car in Thailand, let alone owned one.
Never sold cars I have not owned personally.Originally Posted by good2bhappy
Still taxis though.Originally Posted by Fabian
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)