Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Thailand Expat Jesus Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Online
    22-09-2017 @ 11:00 AM
    Posts
    6,950

    100,000km Service Pajero 3.2?

    Just curious, but should the timing belt be changed at this stage? I assume it's not a timing chain. Is it worth changing anything else at this stage, anti-roll bar bushes etc?

    Ta.

  2. #2
    I am in Jail
    Mr Earl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    23-08-2021 @ 06:47 PM
    Location
    In the Jungle of Love
    Posts
    14,771
    100K probably just change the Trany, coolant, power steering and brake fluids. Check brake pads, also it's probably time to check valve clearances if it has solid lifters.
    Don't worry about bushings unless you're hearing some new rattles from the suspension.
    At 200+k depending on how hard the vehicle is used, expect things like wheel bearings, CV joints, water pump, brake rotors, turbo, strut cartridges/shocks.

    300+k depending..., Ball joints, tie rod end, suspension bushings.
    Last edited by Mr Earl; 28-05-2012 at 04:24 PM.

  3. #3
    Have you got any cheese Thetyim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Mousehole
    Posts
    20,893
    3.2 has a timing chain I think

  4. #4
    Thailand Expat
    Mid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    1,411
    If it's a belt change it .

  5. #5
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last Online
    06-03-2013 @ 01:13 AM
    Location
    Chanthaburi
    Posts
    500
    Many mechanics say change belts every 100,000Kms and also say chains can stretch through wear.

  6. #6
    euston has flown

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    10-06-2016 @ 03:12 AM
    Posts
    6,978
    ^^given the cost of replacing the timing belt vs the cost of dealing with the resultant mess of a timing belt failure. It seems a no brainer

  7. #7
    Thailand Expat
    can123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Last Online
    24-04-2023 @ 02:34 PM
    Posts
    5,547
    I had a Rover 2.0 litre diesel and the recommended replacement of the belt was 60,000 miles. As stated above, the replacement of the belt is essential to prevent potentially huge costs later.

  8. #8
    Have you got any cheese Thetyim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Mousehole
    Posts
    20,893
    Quote Originally Posted by can123
    I had a Rover 2.0 litre diesel and the recommended replacement of the belt was 60,000 miles.
    I suspect your rover diesel had a rotary distributor pump
    Belts used on common rail engines last a lot longer
    Usually about 150,000km between recommended changes

  9. #9
    Thailand Expat Jesus Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Online
    22-09-2017 @ 11:00 AM
    Posts
    6,950
    Quote Originally Posted by hazz View Post
    ^^given the cost of replacing the timing belt vs the cost of dealing with the resultant mess of a timing belt failure. It seems a no brainer
    My mondeo ST 200 in the UK was a chain. Ford didn't change as they said there was no need to. I did 150k miles in that motor with no trouble before i sold it. I just assumed the.Mits might be the same.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •