Originally Posted by jandajoy
Originally Posted by jandajoy
Not the most in-depth of threads (I'm sure there's another one somewhere), but it may point you in the right direction.
https://teakdoor.com/doing-things-leg...perficies.html
I would never try to assume giving any legal advice to you, Bung. Free advice information was suggested by another poster, and I agree with this. Just to cover your ass (CYA).Originally Posted by Bung
However, if you have an amicable relationship AND trust her, it seems you're ahead of the game, so to speak...
Staying away from all lawyers has been a lifelong mandate for me...except for getting free or inexpensive legal advice, apart from the other necessary 'evils' we need these guys/gals for.
IMHO...
It's not a question of rights. You may well have the right to chuck her out if you so decide. That's not the issue. It's actually getting her out that is or may be the problem. Logic and the law can be the last thing considered when emotions get ramped up. She could just ignore any court order that evicts her (that you may get after a long and emotionally painful process). What do you do then, carry her out yourself with her screaming and clutching at doorways in front of your son? It's problematic that she lives there at all, but I understand you are out of the country for work and so it's a convenient arrangement for you both and for your son. Good luck dude, with your situation and with the renovation.Originally Posted by Bung
This is all scary shit! I am at the stage that the more I hear about our non rights the more I think I am nuts. Even tried to suggest Costa Rica, that flew like a brick balloon.
Non of by business Bung, but if you get on so good what happened?
Please get a lawyer.
It will set you and your ex wife mind at rest.
And it will be best for the boy too.
It helps avoid a conflict in the future too.
When one is well versed in the way farangs are viewed in Thailand its not scary shit at all but a perfectly normal scenario when one marries a Thai .
Its only disappointing when one thinks he will have a win which is very rare when a relationship goes to shit.
Sad but true.
Could be worse, Bung could be in the same situation in Australia and end up totally screwed for the rest of his life.
Worst case scenario is he gets arsed from the house and loses his investment.
No biggy as he is still working and can come back. The most important thing here is the future welfare of the lad.
It's a biggy IMHO...he is concerned about his boy and has made the 'future welfare' of the boy a priority in the financial sense...Originally Posted by terry57
His 'relationship' with his boy is a separate issue, as long as the two adults can 'agree' to keep it that way...
I've followed his thread about his house...and it would be a 'biggy' to me if I 'lost it.'...
Just my opinion...
Last edited by BaitongBoy; 08-07-2011 at 12:32 PM.
In my experience and i agree with Baitong Boy comments on this issue, lawyers can create conflict between couples.
The longer they can draw out a settlement the more they are able to justify their large fee. It's in their own interests to do so.
Lawyer services should therefore only be required as a last resort when all else has failed. Unless of course, you have money to burn or are already at odds with your ex, which i believe is not the case
At the end of the day Bung is working off shore and earning the big dollars so all I'm saying is that the lose of the house ain't the end of the World simply because he is able to recoup the money through his work.
I would surmise the future of his lad is a big worry to him and rightly so.
Maybe contributing money into a trust account to ensure the lads schooling and future financial success could be a way to go such in the way a man must pay maintenance to a wife in the real world.
The Ex wife will have a new guy eventually so not to worry about her.
At least this way the money will be there for the lad and not pissed up against the wall.
But yes I'm sure Bung is very concerned about his house as I would be.
A friend of mine has just gone through the same thing. They both owned properties and land for rent. Their agreements was amicable, but only for a short while. A lawyer sorted their issues and divided the collateral accordingly.
Get a lawyer. The longer you leave her in there the more right she has to be there.
You bullied, you laughed, you lied, you lost!
I think when you try to get her out of that house, the reality of the difficulty of this situation is going to set in. Eviction for even good reasons is hard to enforce in Thailand. You need to get her to move ASAP, once you fire that "you have to move bomb" in her direction, you will know how amicable or difficult she will make it. If she decides not to move, I pity you. Better do it sooner than later and be clear of it.
Never invest in what you can't afford to lose.Originally Posted by BaitongBoy
To me it sounds like her name is not on any deeds or titles for the house, and since she has no rental contract, she would merely be staying there as a guest, no? Doesn't sound like she can "take" the house, but it would probably be an ugly scene for the kid to see his mom forcibly removed.
Wait for her to go out, change the locks and put her stuff in the carport and don't answer your phone
If you go in the house and tell her to get out you've got no chance, plus a screaming woman to deal with.
Get her out of the house first, then deal with the legality, I'm sure you can offer far more in the way of incentives to the police. When she's calmed down. Offer her the apartment.
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!"
Recently this debate came up between my wife and I. No, we are not considering divorce, but have been talking about drawing up a will for the both of us.
Throughout the years we have lucky enough to purchase and pay for a parcel of land here and there.
Now if I die first which is probably the case no big deal. Everything is in the wife's name.
Now if she was to die first then what to do? Initially, I stated well let's just put everything into our daughter's name. In other words, on paper it looks like our daughter is the owner of everything we own. My thinking was if some mishap happened to my wife I could still have control.
Not according to any of the lawyers we have paid thus far. A minor child's name on a piece of property means very little.
Wish I could give some more information at this point, but this is what we have been told so far by Thai property/will lawyers.
As Trink would have said, TIT...
By the sounds of it Bung, you get along with your ex amicably, so you should probably ignore half the posters in this thread and deal with the problem amicably.
If the house is in the boys name and he can take possesion at 20, his mother has no need to do anything other than wait. The boy will make the desicions for you i think. 20 is a very young age in any country to own a valuable asset. If you are making other provisions for him, make him wait until he is a least 25 if not 30.
What's Thai for locksmith?
Same as for an electrician, a 'cowboy'.
Can she take my house? It's Thailand, she's Thai. You know the answer.
Get her out quick without warning, there is going to be fallout either way, better that happens with her outside of the property.
Probably right. Hire a hitman.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)