That is a flat out lie.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...207_story.htmlAlso arrested Sunday were Donovan Crowl, 50, a former U.S. Marine, and Army veteran Jessica Watkins, 38. A bartender, Watkins recently told the Ohio Capital Journal that she formed the “Ohio State Regular Militia” in 2019 — a unit of the Oath Keepers, the FBI said — and that the group has appeared at a dozen protests to “protect people.”
The FBI said Watkins posted to Parler a photograph of herself in uniform on Jan. 6, writing, “Me before forcing entry into the Capitol Building. #stopthesteal #stormthecapitol #oathkeepers #ohiomilit
Oh? Skidmark lied?????
What does Tax say?
Why should it be so easy to lie time and time again . . . and not feel inadequate or disingenuous. Proble is that Skidmark et al lie through their skulls all the time and when called on it either just ignore it and march onto the next lie or double down and then ignore it and move on.
Do they have friends in real life?
Yay. They looked until they found one. Good for them.
And this is somehow supposed to mean that Parler should be banished from the world ?
Section 230 is a piece of Internet legislation in the United States, passed into law as part of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 (a common name for Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996), formally codified as Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 at 47 U.S.C. § 230.[a] Section 230 generally provides immunity for website publishers from third-party content. At its core, Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an "interactive computer service" who publish information provided by third-party users:
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
didn't someone hack and 'scrape' parler saving all those posts people thought they'd deleted.
Where the fuck does skidmark get his information ?
Yes. Apparently someone hacked Parler. Which is illegal. And they should be charged for it.
https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/em...y-crimes-48786
There are both state and federal laws in place to protect the privacy of both email and social media. Hacking of either of these types of accounts is an illegal action by the perpetrator. Privacy is a serious consideration for the government and those that live in the United States, and it is possible to prosecute someone that hacks into an account.
The withdrawal of Parler's protections basically left all the data in the Public Domain.
Stupid fucks didn't even know how to protect it.
Having said that, who is surprised that the treasonous rats are now working with the Russians to get it back online?
Parler partially reappears with support from Russian technology firm | Reuters(Reuters) - Parler, a social media website and app popular with the American far right, has partially returned online with the help of a Russian-owned technology company. Parler CEO John Matze and representatives of DDoS-Guard did not reply to requests for comment.Last Wednesday, Matze told Reuters the company was in talks with multiple service providers but declined to elaborate.
DDoS-Guard has worked with other racist, rightist and conspiracy sites that have been used by mass murderers to share messages, including 8kun. It has also supported Russian government sites.
DDoS-Guard’s website lists an address in Scotland under the company name Cognitive Cloud LP, but that is owned by two men in Rostov-on-Don, Russia, Guilmette said. One of them told the Guardian recently that he was not aware of all of the content the company facilitates.
Parler critics said it was a potential security risk for it to depend on a Russian company, as well as an odd choice for a site popular with self-described patriots.
Yes I posted it here....
https://teakdoor.com/computer-news/2...ml#post4209995 (Google suspends Parler app)
Skidmark gets his information from the same places all the other right wing retards get it. We all know that one of his favorite sites is that shit propaganda site "zerohedge".
You dunce. Web scraping is not illegal and the person who got 800 gb of data from the site got it before Parler went down. If you read things posted on this thread you would have known that because I posted an article on the last page explaining it. Once again you prove to be too stupid for your own good.
Last edited by Backspin; 19-01-2021 at 09:56 PM.
Looks like my phone line analogy was right afterall
In a follow-up to RIA's initial reporting, Russia's Sputnik confirmed the following:
The Russian Consulate-General in New York has been completely cut off city telephone lines by the American authorities since 18 January, the diplomatic mission in the city has stated via its official Twitter account. The consulate added that it is occasionally also encountering issues with Internet connectivity.
A source at the Russian mission in New York says US authorities are citing technical issues as the reason for the cut-off. According to the source, however, a two-day delay in the resumption of telephone services is "unheard of". The diplomatic mission in the city has several telephone lines connected and all of them went dead at the same time, the source adds.
US Cuts Off Telephone Line To Russian Consulate In New York Day Before Inauguration | ZeroHedge
Thankfully your little Russian mates never heard of mobile phone technology
Anyway, I've only found the story on TASS and your fave ZeroHedge which quotes another Russian state-owned agency.
Another says that the Russian Embassy has just had 743.963 phone lines installed, from a Danish source:
piv.pivpiv.dk
Last edited by panama hat; 20-01-2021 at 02:17 PM.
Parler loses bid to require Amazon to restore service
A U.S. judge on Thursday rejected Parler’s demand that Amazon.com Inc restore web hosting services for the social media platform, which Amazon had cut off following the Jan. 6 storming of the U.S. Capitol.
U.S. District Judge Barbara Rothstein in Seattle said Parler was unlikely to prove Amazon breached its contract or violated antitrust law by suspending service on Jan. 10, and that it was “not a close call.”
She also forcefully rejected the suggestion that the public interest would be served by a preliminary injunction requiring Amazon Web Services to “host the kind of abusive, violent content at issue in this case, particularly in light of the recent riots at the U.S. Capitol.”
“That event,” she added, “was a tragic reminder that inflammatory rhetoric can - more swiftly and easily than many of us would have hoped - turn a lawful protest into a violent insurrection.”
“We welcome the court’s careful ruling,” an Amazon spokeswoman said in a statement. “This was not a case about free speech. It was about a customer that consistently violated our terms of service.”
Amazon said Parler ignored repeated warnings to effectively moderate the growth on its website of violent content, which included calls to assassinate prominent Democratic politicians, leading business executives and members of the media.
Parler was not immediately available for comment.
More here:
Parler loses bid to require Amazon to restore service | Reuters
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)