Originally Posted by
hazz
why would it be reasonable for apple to expect protection from such trivial innovations?
a) because they are innovations, nevertheless, and Apple should be afforded compensations for others riding on their coattails. No one is saying that no one else should build wedge shaped laptops (or use 'slide to unlock') but that they should compensate Apple for copying their work.
b) because if Apple were to do nothing about it, others would be (and are) using equally trivial patents/innovations to go after Apple, in search of cheap thrills.
c) copying each others has been going on for decades, and in most cases, most manufacturers just sat by idly and did nothing about it. Apple takes it seriously, and at least tries to make turn others copying it into an expensive proposition.
As long as others are doing it with impunity, I prefer to see Apple be aggressive and beat the others at their own game, time and time again.