Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 103
  1. #1
    Thailand Expat
    khmen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Last Online
    31-12-2020 @ 05:03 AM
    Location
    Discombobulated
    Posts
    2,466

    Muslim's against Crusades banned

    About bloody time. These are the morons who burned poppies last rembrance day. 'Orrible shower.

    Full article here: BBC News - Muslims Against Crusades banned by Theresa May

    The home secretary is banning Muslims Against Crusades (MAC), a group that planned an anti-Armistice Day protest.
    It had wanted to repeat a demonstration held last year, when it burned poppies near London's Albert Hall.

    Theresa May's order will make membership or support of MAC a criminal offence. It is closely linked to seven other previously-banned groups.

    The organisation, now dissolved, said "the call for Islam will never be silenced by any ban or proscription".

    Mrs May said she was satisfied that Muslims Against Crusades (MAC) was "simply another name for an organisation already proscribed under a number of names".

    "The organisation was proscribed in 2006 for glorifying terrorism and we are clear it should not be able to continue these activities by simply changing its name," she said.

    Muslims Against Crusades is the latest incarnation of an organisation originally set up by extremist preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed, who fled the UK six years ago.

    Its previous versions are all proscribed groups. Most recently, it has been involved in potential stand-offs with the English Defence League and it also demonstrated outside the US Embassy on the 10th anniversary of 9/11.
    Anjem Choudary, the leading public figure in the organisation, accused the government of attempting to cover up the truth - but hours later the group declared that it was "hearby dissolved".

    Anyone who would have joined the demonstration as a member or supporter of MAC could face up to 10 years in jail.
    Individuals can be charged with an offence if police have reasonable suspicion that activities are linked to a banned group.

    In a statement on its website, MAC said: "The intended banning of Muslims Against Crusades by Home Secretary Theresa May is a great victory for Islam and Muslims and highlights the sheer hatred the British government has towards sincere Muslims who wish to peacefully speak out against policies that are (from every angle) anti-Islam and anti-Muslim."

    During its 2010 protest, members of the group burned poppies and chanted "British soldiers, burn in hell".

  2. #2
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    MAC seeing the ban as "a great victory for Islam.." is typical of their illogical rhetoric.

    Once again, radical religious extremists put foot in mouth.

    Would they ever tolerate similar demonstrations and desecrations by non-Muslims in their own lands?

    Of course not. Freedom of religious expression is persecuted and barely possible in Muslim countries, while Western countries not only permit free religious expression and even fund the building of mosques and Islamic centres in Western countries.

  3. #3
    Thailand Expat
    rawlins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    13-04-2020 @ 05:52 PM
    Posts
    2,942
    They will probably ban the English Defence League next to even out the score..

    The police arrested 170 people today that wanted to peacefully pay their respects at the cenotaph.

    I read somewhere that the Muslims that carried out the poppy burning last year got a £50 fine.

  4. #4
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    ^ You're kidding me!

    Really? Do we need a permit now to openly yet peacefully express our thanks to our own?

    How nutty is the politically correct balancing act going to get in UK?

    BNP and EDF are extreme in their views and not easily tolerated by the majority, but this ban sounds as though the Met and its governors are in confusion.

  5. #5
    Thailand Expat
    kmart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Online
    03-10-2022 @ 11:24 AM
    Location
    Rayong.
    Posts
    11,498
    Bayonet the cnuts.

  6. #6
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Just shut the fekin door!

    Just don't need the miserable, greedy, ungrateful, spongeing ragheads.

    Get them the fek back to their own miserable land they escaped from, let them deal with their own shit instead of looking to get a better deal in UK.

    All they're doing is capitalizing on the old empire guilt trip, like as if whitey owes them something?

    Bleeding load of intimidating arseholes bighting the hand that feeds them.

    Bunch of vipers!

  7. #7
    Have you got any cheese Thetyim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Mousehole
    Posts
    20,893
    Quote Originally Posted by rawlins
    The police arrested 170 people today that wanted to peacefully pay their respects at the cenotaph.
    Were any of them wearing a crown ?

  8. #8
    Member
    Breny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Last Online
    22-09-2015 @ 10:44 PM
    Location
    The 4th dimension.
    Posts
    878
    That may be all and well but if you put the Union flag in your window at home (uk) and if the police get a complaint about it then you are asked to take it down.... If you refuse then you are given an £80 fine. Also in Bradford the cctv cameras have been taken down in the area of a local mosque as it intrudes into the "religious freedoms" of the followers.

  9. #9
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    UK had a jeefapolees, a raghead Iraqui who beat up a fellow Iraqui for billing him for some website design.

    He's inside at the mo, hopefully getting the crap beaten out of him.

    House of lords also got some paki or indo in the ranks, pulling side re laws etc.

    Lotsa biased non whites in the gov. circles, all big business, Tories luv em, mqkes em feel all fuzzy and pc, xtian like, milk of human kindness and all that shit, feed the poor nigas an all, may get ta heven if dey try.

    STUPID BRITISH GUILT TRIP

    WE OWE THEM NOTHING!!

    FEK the TORIES and FEK the house of lords and FEK the English crown for being so pussy whipped and allowing a once decent land to be handed over to PC wimps and the money grubbing Tories.

    Only reason the wogs are starting to run the land is because the money they got, that the Brit aristos want, so the ponces at the top entertain Lady Beghum Khan, baroness of Hagisland Fifeshire (or some such name and title she bought), and she'll prolly become one of the Law Lords and then Brits will really be told what to do in their own backyard.

    I think I'm getting more EDF by the day.
    Last edited by ENT; 12-11-2011 at 05:08 PM.

  10. #10
    Member
    Mr Gribbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    25-01-2013 @ 11:57 PM
    Location
    Harlem
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post
    Just shut the fekin door!

    Just don't need the miserable, greedy, ungrateful, spongeing ragheads.

    Get them the fek back to their own miserable land they escaped from, let them deal with their own shit instead of looking to get a better deal in UK.

    All they're doing is capitalizing on the old empire guilt trip, like as if whitey owes them something?

    Bleeding load of intimidating arseholes bighting the hand that feeds them.

    Bunch of vipers!

    You'd have a legitimate argument if the UK didn't invade their lands, kill their people, and steal their resources. Then they wouldn't be obliged to take them in as immigrants, and could tell them to fuck off without a moments thought. The UK broke it, now they are obligated to fix it.

  11. #11
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    ^ Broke what?

    UK allowed them in on the basis of equality as bona fide immigrants or as refugees from persecution by their own people in their own lands.

    Nothing could be fairer than that.
    Abuse the asylum and hospitality freely given, then expect a negative result.

  12. #12
    En route
    Cujo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    21-04-2024 @ 08:24 PM
    Location
    Reality.
    Posts
    32,939
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Gribbs View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post
    Just shut the fekin door!

    Just don't need the miserable, greedy, ungrateful, spongeing ragheads.

    Get them the fek back to their own miserable land they escaped from, let them deal with their own shit instead of looking to get a better deal in UK.

    All they're doing is capitalizing on the old empire guilt trip, like as if whitey owes them something?

    Bleeding load of intimidating arseholes bighting the hand that feeds them.

    Bunch of vipers!



    You'd have a legitimate argument if the UK didn't invade their lands, kill their people, and steal their resources. Then they wouldn't be obliged to take them in as immigrants, and could tell them to fuck off without a moments thought. The UK broke it, now they are obligated to fix it.
    That's the UK's problem right there in a nutshell.
    That feeling they are 'obliged'.
    It should be 'yes we invaded your lands and did all those things, just be grateful we're not still doing it.
    Now fuck off.

  13. #13
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Last Online
    25-06-2013 @ 11:56 AM
    Posts
    11
    You'd have a legitimate argument if the UK didn't invade their lands, kill their people, and steal their resources. Then they wouldn't be obliged to take them in as immigrants, and could tell them to fuck off without a moments thought. The UK broke it, now they are obligated to fix it.[/quote]

    And the Muslims would have a legitimate argument about what the British are obliged to do if they hadn't built their religion on "Convert, move or die".

  14. #14
    Dan
    Guest
    They're a bunch of idiots but at least there's some kind of balance: if it's not OK to burn a Koran then I guess it shouldn't be OK to burn a poppy, since that's now effectively a religious symbol in Britain (and ain't that progress.) As for banning the organization, I don't see why that's necessary. Promoting terrorism is surely a crime already so I don't see much that's gained (but I do see a lot that's lost) by allowing the government to say which organizations you can and can't join.

  15. #15
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,924
    We're British. We should allow them to march and protest. We should also allow the BNP and EDL to march and protest.

    And we should simply publicise the route these Muslim protestors choose to take and the time they plan on setting off. Oh, and finally, ensure that the old bill are busy elsewhere.

    Problem solved.
    The next post may be brought to you by my little bitch Spamdreth

  16. #16
    Not a Mod. Begbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Lagrangian Point
    Posts
    11,367
    Quote Originally Posted by Breny View Post
    That may be all and well but if you put the Union flag in your window at home (uk) and if the police get a complaint about it then you are asked to take it down.... .

    Thankfully in Scotland there's a bill going through parliament at the moment to ban this symbol of sectarian hatred. Maximum sentence 5 years in prison.

  17. #17
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,924
    Quote Originally Posted by Begbie View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Breny View Post
    That may be all and well but if you put the Union flag in your window at home (uk) and if the police get a complaint about it then you are asked to take it down.... .

    Thankfully in Scotland there's a bill going through parliament at the moment to ban this symbol of sectarian hatred. Maximum sentence 5 years in prison.
    Not going to pass is it, unless the fucking pikies have taken over the asylum.

  18. #18
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Quote Originally Posted by Just another BOF View Post
    You'd have a legitimate argument if the UK didn't invade their lands, kill their people, and steal their resources. Then they wouldn't be obliged to take them in as immigrants, and could tell them to fuck off without a moments thought. The UK broke it, now they are obligated to fix it.
    And the Muslims would have a legitimate argument about what the British are obliged to do if they hadn't built their religion on "Convert, move or die".[/QUOTE]

    Your comment re. the Muslim strategy of conversion at the point of the sword is exactly what Nazism is.

    On that basis alone, Islam is a Nazi philosophy.

  19. #19
    Member
    Mr Gribbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    25-01-2013 @ 11:57 PM
    Location
    Harlem
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by Koojo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Gribbs View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post
    Just shut the fekin door!

    Just don't need the miserable, greedy, ungrateful, spongeing ragheads.

    Get them the fek back to their own miserable land they escaped from, let them deal with their own shit instead of looking to get a better deal in UK.

    All they're doing is capitalizing on the old empire guilt trip, like as if whitey owes them something?

    Bleeding load of intimidating arseholes bighting the hand that feeds them.

    Bunch of vipers!



    You'd have a legitimate argument if the UK didn't invade their lands, kill their people, and steal their resources. Then they wouldn't be obliged to take them in as immigrants, and could tell them to fuck off without a moments thought. The UK broke it, now they are obligated to fix it.
    That's the UK's problem right there in a nutshell.
    That feeling they are 'obliged'.
    It should be 'yes we invaded your lands and did all those things, just be grateful we're not still doing it.
    Now fuck off.
    Last time I checked some news sources the UK was still knee deep in Muslim countries, and starting wars in them, like they just recently did in Libya. It's not just Muslim countries either, they did it to non Muslim African and Asian countries too. If the UK can mind its own business and not create problems, then they can legitimately close their borders, until then they are obliged to help those who lives they helped destroy.

  20. #20
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,924
    Gribbs=Socal.

    Such an eminently recognisable form of juvenile trolling.


  21. #21
    ความสุขในอีสาน
    nigelandjan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Frinton on sea and Ban Pak
    Posts
    13,336
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT
    Get them the fek back to their own miserable land they escaped from, let them deal with their own shit instead of looking to get a better deal in UK.
    Funny you mention that ,, all the crap my missus has had to pledge etc to apply for her naturalisation here BTW she aint a terrorist works in a care home for the min wage etc . If they dont meet the criteria in these forms then send the shit back !
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
    We're British.
    Speak for yourself I,m ENGLISH
    I'm proud of my 38" waist , also proud I have never done drugs

  22. #22
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Last time I checked (2 minutes ago) UK troops are involved in Iraq and Afghanistan,the only two Muslim countries listed, both in conjunction with US troops.

    Looking up US troop deployments and you'll see that 20% of US troops are deployed overseas in Muslim and non-Muslim countries and in US bases(many) globally.

    As I posted on another thread on the Libya oil invasion, that USA would shortly invent an Al Quaeda boey man there, sure enough they have!

    Oil rich Nigeria is now the USA's "home of international terrorism".

    Hell, eh, them ragheads with boxcutters are at it again, long distance from Africa.

    Amazing

    Gribbs, you got a problem with divided loyalties, raghead versus sepo.

    Nigerian oil will solve it though, eh, pal?
    Last edited by ENT; 14-11-2011 at 02:01 PM.

  23. #23
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,924
    Quote Originally Posted by nigelandjan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT
    Get them the fek back to their own miserable land they escaped from, let them deal with their own shit instead of looking to get a better deal in UK.
    Funny you mention that ,, all the crap my missus has had to pledge etc to apply for her naturalisation here BTW she aint a terrorist works in a care home for the min wage etc . If they dont meet the criteria in these forms then send the shit back !
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
    We're British.
    Speak for yourself I,m ENGLISH
    Well it's a massive shame you haven't learned how to write it properly.


  24. #24
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Quote Originally Posted by nigelandjan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT
    Get them the fek back to their own miserable land they escaped from, let them deal with their own shit instead of looking to get a better deal in UK.
    Funny you mention that ,, all the crap my missus has had to pledge etc to apply for her naturalisation here BTW she aint a terrorist works in a care home for the min wage etc . If they dont meet the criteria in these forms then send the shit back !
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
    We're British.
    Speak for yourself I,m ENGLISH
    I'm British and can not get social welfare or university assistance until I'v lived in UK for 18 months first. I've so far been offered only 26 ponds OAP.

    Great.

    But if I jump off the back of a truck from Europe without papers, ID, etc. I'd be home and hosed, dole, house, job offers medical help the lot!

  25. #25
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,924
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post

    I'm British and can not get social welfare or university assistance until I'v lived in UK for 18 months first. I've so far been offered only 26 ponds OAP.

    Great.

    But if I jump off the back of a truck from Europe without papers, ID, etc. I'd be home and hosed, dole, house, job offers medical help the lot!
    Give it a shot then. All you have to do is go to France and flush your passport down the bog.

    Then talk like Borat.


Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •