GOOGLE has defended its policy of electronically monitoring its users’ content for child sexual abuse after it tipped off police in Texas to a child pornography suspect.
Houston restaurant worker John Henry Skillern, 41, was arrested Thursday following a cyber-tip that Google had passed along via the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), based outside Washington.
“He was trying to get around getting caught, he was trying to keep it inside his email,” said detective David Nettles of the Houston Metro internet Crimes Against Children Taskforce.
“I can’t see that information, I can’t see that photo — but Google can,” he told Houston television station KHOU, which first reported the story.
It’s common knowledge that the world’s leading internet service, like its rivals, tracks users’ online behaviour in order to finetune its advertising services.
But the Texas case prompted concerns about the degree to which Google might be giving information about its users’ conduct to law enforcement agencies.
The story seems like a simple one with a happy outcome — a bad man did a crime and got caught,” blogged John Hawes, chief of operations at Virus Bulletin, a cyber security consultancy.
“However, there will of course be some who see it as yet another sign of how the twin Big Brothers of state agencies and corporate behemoths have nothing better to do than delve into the private lives of all and sundry, looking for dirt,” he said.
In an email, a Google spokesman said: “Sadly, all internet companies have to deal with child sexual abuse.
“It’s why Google actively removes illegal imagery from our services — including search and Gmail — and immediately reports abuse to the NCMEC.” The NCMEC operates the CyberTipline, through which internet service providers can relay information about suspect online child sexual abuse on to police departments.
“Each child sexual abuse image is given a unique digital fingerprint, which enables our systems to identify those pictures, including in Gmail,” added the spokesman, who did not disclose technical details about the process.
“It is important to remember that we only use this technology to identify child sexual abuse imagery — not other email content that could be associated with criminal activity (for example using email to plot a burglary).”
In a separate email, the NCMEC said federal law requires internet service providers to report suspected child porn to the CyberTipline.
“NCMEC makes all CyberTipline reports available to appropriate law-enforcement agencies for review and possible investigation,” it said.
Google defends child porn tip-offs to police | News.com.au
Don't think anyone would complain about this, unless someones typo gets u on a mailing list, but what else will they decide they need to report?