Sorry you are the one who is confused.Originally Posted by koman
Well no shit sherlock. For Obama to be responsible for adding to the debt he would have to be increasing the deficit. In fact the opposite is happening.Originally Posted by koman
The two main reasons the debt is increasing because of the two wars and the disastrous Bush era tax cuts. Just because the debt has increased under Obama does not make it his fault.
Once again since you seem to have missed it before;
Really? Sorry, but I don't like to eat Taco's.Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Originally Posted by RPETER65Originally Posted by raycarey
Good grief . . .Originally Posted by RPETER65
Definitely living in the end of times.
The middle east on fire CIC talking to fruit loops in a tub but won't talk to Bibi...
Has he put Bibi on ignore ?
Understandable
Quick! You still have time to edit your post before you are accused of being a rabid anti-Semite and terrorist apologist.Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
Ahh they all hate him. However, they are all also owned by the zionist lobby groups in their respective countries, or dominated by countries that themselves are owned by the zionist lobbies. Therefore he has complete impunity to do what ever he likes....especially in the US because he's the boss of that town 100%
Everything he touches - seems Bath House Barry's plan to tax college savings plans is going down in flames.
If there was any message to take from President Obama’s State of the Union address, it was that he intended to raise taxes in order to pay for some great free stuff, like two years of community college. That generous offer came with the caveat that 529 college savings plans, which let Americans save money tax-free for higher education expenses, would lose their tax benefits.
The New York Times reports Tuesday, though, that that idea, which had become “a distraction,” is now off the table.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/28/us...ngs-plans.html
A Deplorable Bitter Clinger
If you are rich and do not have to save up to pay college fees and living expenses, I assume that the money you use to pay for it is only taxed once (income tax.... as long as the person is not rich enough to not have to pay that anyway). If you are poor and have to save up, would this little idea mean that they would pay tax on the salary they save, and then pay more tax on the savings?Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Right - so he tried to do something that your mob would like to do if they thought of it first. Take more from the poor so that the rich are not forced to contribute.
You should love obomba - he is a bigger tax cutter than Dubya was
"Crunching the numbers at the liberal think tank the Center for American Progress, analyst Michael Linden found that if one compares the cost of tax cuts in just the first four years of Bush’s term (2001–04) to the first four years of Obama's (2009–12), Obama’s tax cuts are bigger. The value of the Bush tax cuts were about $475 billion in those first four years, or about 1.1 percent of GDP. Obama’s total about $1 trillion, or 1.6 percent of GDP."
What a stupid c*nt
DEFIANT MICHELLE O REFUSES TO WRAP
Michelle Obama Gives Zero F*cks About What the Saudis Wanted Her To Wear | The Daily Banter
Michelle O gives zero fucks about what the Saudi's or Boontard wants her to wear.
Boon Mee: patriotically calls FLOTUS a c*nt because she won't accede to the whims of fundamentalist dickheads.
I should imagine that Mikky Obomba has invested in fracking, so is pissed off about the Saudis right now.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)