Thread: 2020 US Presidential Race

Originally Posted by tomcat

...(yet) may already have arrived in the minds of a majority of voters...

I imagine a lot would like to imagine it's so but I doubt it.
It's one thing to approve of gay marriage, but a president who represents the voter, I doubt it.

Originally Posted by Cujo

I reiterate, the U.S. isn't ready .... takes it up the arse.

Isn't it an unofficial but generally accepted "thing" for unmarried American Christian girls to take it up the arse so as to "put out" yet save their virginity for their wedding night?
Gender equality insists that all people who take it up the arse be treated the same.

I don't know but it's kind of irrelevant as no one running for president has declared themselves to be an unmarried, Christian virgin girl.

^ The point being what's good for the goose should be good for the gander.

You're not making any sense.

Originally Posted by Cujo

You're not making any sense.

S.O.P.

SOP for you two is on display again: Not being able to think even slightly laterally or to follow a simple line of thought.

So if it's okay for unmarried single Christian women to take it up the date it should be ok for the president of the U.S.?
Ridiculous.
Apart from which no one said it wasn't, just that the U.S. electorate won't find it acceptable.

Originally Posted by Cujo

Apart from which no one said it wasn't, just that the U.S. electorate won't find it acceptable.

Wrong. The trumpanees will not find it acceptable. The reality is the overwhelming majority of Americans support same sex marriage.

***sigh***
You said America is not ready to accept a person who takes it up the arse, implying that America doesn't accept the practice of taking it up the arse.
In a tongue and cheek manner, I suggested that America may very well accept the practice and cited the virgin Christain girls practice of taking it up the arse. I mentioned gender equality.
You said it's irrlevant, as if dismissing the gender equaity point.
I said what's good for the goose etc, and that saying went over your head, and still it hadn't dropped that I was being snide right from the first mention of virgins taking it up the arse, while at the same time making a point: if women can take up the arse, then men should be able to with just as much acceptance.
All this in response to "America is not ready for someone who takes it...."

Originally Posted by tomcat

...the US electorate may be inclined to focus on his ideas for improved governance, probity in office, and simple respect for the intelligence of the American voter...and let the tabloids and alt right media cover any details of his personal life they find salacious...

It would be nice to think so but then the US electorate also voted a giant orange turd into office so I'm not so sure.

In fact at this point I think all glue and scissors should be removed from the reach of the US electorate until such point in time they prove they won't eat and / or run with them.

Originally Posted by Golden Brown

Is that how you really feel Ant? Tella Papa

Cool story.

See you with your next login.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Wrong. The trumpanees will not find it acceptable. The reality is the overwhelming majority of Americans support same sex marriage.

As I already said, it's one thing to accept gay marriage.
Quite another to approve a gay president representing the nation on the world stage.
I wonder how that would affect the U.S. - Saudi relationship for example.
Not happening.

Originally Posted by Cujo

I wonder how that would affect the U.S. - Saudi relationship for example.

...the same question could be asked about a Jewish or female president or *gasp* a Jewish female...in any event, the Saudis need the US far more than the US needs the Saudis...

Originally Posted by tomcat

the same question could be asked about a Jewish or female president or *gasp* a Jewish female

Or one that grabs pussies and pays a lot of money to not fuck porn stars.

Originally Posted by tomcat

...the US electorate may be inclined to focus on his ideas for improved governance, probity in office, and simple respect for the intelligence of the American voter...and let the tabloids and alt right media cover any details of his personal life they find salacious...

Is that the same USA voting public who elected Trump?

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Or one that grabs pussies and pays a lot of money to not fuck porn stars.

...actually, I think the Saudis find that a plus...

Originally Posted by David48atTD

Is that the same USA voting public minority who elected Trump?

...yes, but trailer park trash is dying off...

Amusing video of a trumpanzee in the wild.

Claiming to be a vet, when the nearest he's been to serving was watching Seal Team on the telly.

45's total breakdown nearing completion. All documented on twitter. Will be a great source for historians.

Looks to me like he got off the obstruction indictment because no fucker would listen to the stupid baldy orange cunto.

Mr Mueller laid out multiple episodes in which the president directed others to influence or curtail the Russia investigation after the special counsel’s appointment in May 2017.


The report says those efforts “were mostly unsuccessful, but that is largely because the persons who surrounded the president declined to carry out orders or accede to his requests”.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8877411.html

^ Does "intent to obstruct" count?

Originally Posted by happynz

Does "intent to obstruct but frustrated because no one would listen" count?

...ftfy...