If he had been taken alive, the uproar from both the 'true patriot' and islamoloonie brigade would have been deafening.
probably, some strange "obscure" fraternity sects like S&B will have him for dinerOriginally Posted by baby maker
Bush will have his head of course, he needs all the brain he can get
The Teak Door Tin Hat Brigade is winding itself up into a spectacular spin now. Very enjoyable.
Someone brought up torture (and how it might have helped find OBL) in this thread. This post points to another direction,………(it didn’t help)
The debate is now manipulating the question at issue, suggesting that the fact Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Abu Faraj al-Libi provided tidbits (or, according to several reports, unconvincing denials) that led to OBL equates to us needing torture to get that intelligence. Particularly given that CIA used the denials of KSM and al-Libi as indications they were hiding something, it’s unclear why a denial without coercion would have served differently.
But there are two points that seem key in assessing the torture question. First, both KSM and al-Libi had critical intelligence they withheld under torture. KSM knew of Abu Ahmed’s trusted role and real name; al-Libi knew Abu Ahmed was OBL’s trusted courier and may have known of what became OBL’s compound.
And neither of them revealed that information to the CIA.
They waterboarded KSM 183 times in a month, and he either never got asked about couriers guarding OBL, or he avoided answering the question honestly. Had KSM revealed that detail, Bush might have gotten OBL 8 years ago.
And just as importantly, the whole time KSM was shielding Abu Ahmed’s true identity while being waterboarded, KSM was also lying to the CIA about where OBL was. When asked what things he lied about under torture at his 2007 CSRT hearing, KSM specifically said he first said he didn’t know of OBL’s whereabouts, and then confirmed false locations for him, in response to the torture.
President [of the Tribunal]: What I’m trying to get at is any statement that you made was it because of this treatment, to use your word, you claim torture. Do you make any statements because of that?
[snip]
KSM: I make up stories just location UBL. Where is he? I don’t know. Then he torture me. Then I said yes, he is in this area or this is al Qaida which I don’t him. I say no. They torture me.
So at the time when KSM was guarding crucial information about Abu Ahmed and with it OBL’s location, he was making shit up to get the torture to stop.
As I understand the torture apologists’ arguments, the whole point of it (aside from generating propaganda and making chicken hawks excited) is to get crucial intelligence quickly, to skip the laborious process of acquiring a mosaic of information and developing deep knowledge of an organization over years–that is, to skip the process that has now resulted in the death of OBL. But instead of skipping that step, we got denials and–in the case of KSM–disinformation. And only now, eight and six years later, we’re only now becoming aware of the intelligence these men had that would have led to OBL had our interrogation been more successful.
Link: http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2011/05/03/ksm-was-lying-about-obls-location-while-hiding-the-courier-who-could-locate-him/
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
Originally Posted by sabang
sab, shouldn't this be correctly labeled a conspiracy ? with "if" you can make all kind of scenarios,
you are American Humbert, you are not trained to think independently outside your government propaganda, so shut up will you ?Originally Posted by Humbert
it is if you are a brain dead American patriot loon,Originally Posted by baby maker
Butters, got to give you and A for the entertainment factor. Almost fell out of my chair laughing, but you also are not rowing with both oars in the water.
not as much as you American patriot nuttersOriginally Posted by Humbert
how does Kool Aid taste ?
^Pernod must accelerate brain atrophy.
He did not give the others he wasted a proper burial. What lovely poetic justice. All of his followers can now sit in the dark and just wonder...wonder they will.
Oh Butters... Why would the USA want a big ole slap in the face?
If the guy was as close to "Big Guy" as he thought he was, maybe he will be resurrected in a few days and prove them wrong. It's not gonna happen, you need your beauty rest so dont lose any sleep over this.
Would there be any benefit to displaying an unrecognizable corpse?
It's possible that the reason they dumped the corpse in the ocean is that it is unrecognizable.
If they put 2 in his head it's quite possible they literally blew his face off.
They don't use .22 rounds these guys.
And showing an unrecognizable, faceless corpse would be worse than dumping it in the ocean.
Just another possible explanation.
As someone already said, dumping the body in the ocean so quickly defies rational belief. There must be a reason.
We've heard a lot from the tin hat brigade except a plausibile alternative explanation.
After all, we agree on one thing and that is that something happened.
If not as reported then what? And why?
Last edited by Cujo; 04-05-2011 at 08:05 AM.
A 'conspiracy theorist' looking at the first day lead yesterday would have questioned the image of him leaping out of bed firing an AK 47 and hiding behing his wife.
Many papers used that imagery.
By day 2 it was admitted to be wrong.
The US haven't really clarified their story. Yet they had sufficient time to do it. Puttng the body out of reach in the most extreme way is now only going to satisfy the most credulous. So they are going to have to lay out all their (gruesome) evidence now, which they wouldn't have had to do if they'd used common sense initially.
lived in luxury,millionaires mansion?
woman used as a human shield?
mechanical failure of helicopter...then blown up?
OBL..shot in a 'firefight?
DNA'd then buried at sea with muslim protocol?
need a new PR team!
Sure they do, depending on the circumstances- special forces teams aren't bound by the usual weapons choices.Originally Posted by Koojo
That said, it was probably a .223 round shot from an M4 considering it was close-quarters.
I agree entirely.
The man was an admitted mass murderer with no remorse, who intended to continue.
If he had surrendered to the Seals then I can understand some criticism, but he didn't. What were they supposed to do, read him his rights? Make him a pot of tea?
Hopefully sufficient information has been obtained to identify other members of his organization, and the world has been made just a tad safer in the long term.
I expect we will still have to remove our shoes at airports though.....
It is interesting that information leading to this action was obtained through interrogating suspects at Guantanamo Bay. Now we understand Obama's decision to keep the base open.
As for that photo from inside the situation Room. Obama looks angry and Clinton looks shocked.
I think they've just seen Dick Cheney's 2012 Republican nomination poster on the wall of Obama's house.
I would take that bet.Originally Posted by Carrabow
It would have been an M4 (with a 30 round mag) or (though not likely) a 9mm or .45 round.
Edited- I did a search to try to find the info- there are at least 4 different rifles (and a couple of pistols) in the running.
Last edited by FailSafe; 04-05-2011 at 08:22 AM.
There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.
HST
I think the story is highly misleading for several reasons. It distracts the attention from the truth and they must have known the story had holes,Originally Posted by The_Ghost_Of_The_Moog
in the meantime, in Libya and Syria
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)