Thread: Australia probes navy 'sex game'

Originally Posted by November Rain

Originally Posted by dirtydog

Sleeping with a female officer or a lesbian, or having sex in a strange place, won more money, the report said.

Originally Posted by dirtydog

Sex on a pool table or with a lesbian reportedly scored higher points.

OK, I'm con-foosed.

Why would a lesbian have sex with a guy if there were other females on board? Or are we talking a man's idea of a lesbian, rather than the true definition????


Always said women shouldn't be onboard naval vessels.

Not all of them are strictly 100% clit lickers all the time. Some of them have the occasional hankering for a bit of hard cock like normal women. A question of degrees I guess. We all like to categorize people into neat absolute boxes as it helps to remove those confusing grey areas. I am sure a lot of self confessed lezzos have transgressed to the other side on occasions. Quite an achievement for any bloke who could swing em over even temporarily (however ugly they might be), and certainly worthy of the very highest points score.

^ This is the level of debate these days in Australia. It's as if regretting having sex with someone can be construed as rape.

Originally Posted by Lily

Originally Posted by November Rain

Why would a lesbian have sex with a guy if there were other females on board? Or are we talking a man's idea of a lesbian, rather than the true definition????

Of course! Lesbians are any woman who is actually in a position of authority over him or shows no interest in him at all.

Is that like when they light up a smoke and start talking on the mobile while sitting on your face?

Originally Posted by Smithson

Apparently the RAN prohibits sexual relations at sea. It would be interesting to see the uproar if lesbians or gays were reprimanded for this.

Last night I was discussing this and the rugby players scandal with my sister. Apparently someone intoxicated cannot legally give consent, therefore having sex with a drunk woman could be considered rape. However it's gray area and a jury would never convict. To make things clear ppl are suggesting creating a law making it illegal to have sex while intoxicated.

Its not really a gray area. Basically, the chic has to be so pissed she doesn't understand whats happening before its considered non consent. Which means virtually passed out. If the woman responds positively to sexual advances its regarded as inferred consent and by the same token, if she reacts negatively, its regarded as non consent. Just being drunk is no excuse for doing something you would normally consider wrong. If the law accepted that excuse it would open the door to all kinds of criminal defences. People get drunk by choice and knowing it may affect their judgement. They have to take responsibility for that choice.

Originally Posted by Panda

Originally Posted by Smithson

Apparently the RAN prohibits sexual relations at sea. It would be interesting to see the uproar if lesbians or gays were reprimanded for this.

Last night I was discussing this and the rugby players scandal with my sister. Apparently someone intoxicated cannot legally give consent, therefore having sex with a drunk woman could be considered rape. However it's gray area and a jury would never convict. To make things clear ppl are suggesting creating a law making it illegal to have sex while intoxicated.

Its not really a gray area. Basically, the chic has to be so pissed she doesn't understand whats happening before its considered non consent. Which means virtually passed out. If the woman responds positively to sexual advances its regarded as inferred consent and by the same token, if she reacts negatively, its regarded as non consent. Just being drunk is no excuse for doing something you would normally consider wrong. If the law accepted that excuse it would open the door to all kinds of criminal defences. People get drunk by choice and knowing it may affect their judgement. They have to take responsibility for that choice.

Men in Australia are now being encouraged not to have sex with with women under the influence.

My sister has a PHD and works abused children, according to her responding to sexual advances while under the influence didn't amount to consent.

She also said that a jury never gives a conviction in a rape case, but had to back track when I asked how men ended up in prison for rape.

My father and BIB weren't game to enter the discussion unless it was to back up the ladies. In Australia going against the grain of political correctness is not tolerated and men will find themselves in trouble for it.

I am an Aussie mate and I can assure you that consensual sex with a drunk woman is not considered as rape. The woman would have to be so drunk as to be incapable of giving consent to make it rape. Shit if they did what your sister reckons why the hell would blokes be buying the girls drinks all night?
Your sister is talking out of her arse. Being drunk is no excuse for regrettable behaviour under law by either men or women. You make the choice to get drunk knowing it will impair your judgement and you are responsible for what actions you take after that. Turn it around and ask your learned sister if the woman was sober and the blokes judgement was impaired by alcohol, -- would it be considered rape if he regretted it in the morning? I'll bet she says "no, -- thats different".

Originally Posted by Panda

I'll bet she says "no, -- thats different".

Of course she would and she'd say it was a stupid suggestion.

I agree with you 100% and I'm sure the law does too. Of course it's BS, but this is the state of things in Oz and other countries.

Originally Posted by dirtydog

Same as slags then

Yeah.

Originally Posted by Panda

Not all of them are strictly 100% clit lickers all the time. Some of them have the occasional hankering for a bit of hard cock like normal women. A question of degrees I guess. We all like to categorize people into neat absolute boxes as it helps to remove those confusing grey areas. I am sure a lot of self confessed lezzos have transgressed to the other side on occasions. Quite an achievement for any bloke who could swing em over even temporarily (however ugly they might be), and certainly worthy of the very highest points score.

What a wanker you are.

Originally Posted by Smithson

^ This is the level of debate these days in Australia. It's as if regretting having sex with someone can be construed as rape.

Not true

Originally Posted by Smithson

Men in Australia are now being encouraged not to have sex with with women under the influence.

Not true either

Originally Posted by Smithson

She also said that a jury never gives a conviction in a rape case, but had to back track when I asked how men ended up in prison for rape.

You are lying! If you were not, your sister would have told you that less than eighty percent of rapes are reported, of those less than fifty per cent of perpetrators are actually charged and of that, less than five per cent are convicted and even of the convicted only fifty per cent of them actually do any time. Of that tiny percentage of people who do time, it is not their first offence. If your sister doesn't know that or is not prepared to stand up for it, she is in the wrong job.

Are you saying that men dont rape? That no man should be goaled for rape?

You, and your father actually argued about that with your sister who works with abused children????

Who is abusing those children your sister works with?

Oh, surely not men?

No, it cant possibly.

Originally Posted by Smithson

My father and BIB weren't game to enter the discussion unless it was to back up the ladies. In Australia going against the grain of political correctness is not tolerated and men will find themselves in trouble for it.

No... no Australian man would ever rape.................................unless she deserved it, of course.