Thread: Multiple dead in shooting at Colorado supermarket

Originally Posted by havnfun

More people are killed by knives anyway

Originally Posted by havnfun

Here are the stats from the FBI from 2018.

Maybe you should have a go at reading them.

I think his argument was supposed to be that more people are killed with knives than they are with semi-auto rifles, which is true.

Yeah and remember all those mass stabbings... Oh.

More people are killed and injured by mass shootings with pistols as well.

End of the day you could ban rifles right now and it would do almost nothing to drive firearm deaths down. The numbers would be statistically insignificant.

Every damn weekend mass shootings happen in the hood and nobody gives a shit. Barely makes local news.

Chicago shooting: 8 shot, 1 fatally, at Wrightwood gathering | abc7chicago.com


Chicago mass shooting: Video captures moment gunman opened fire inside Park Manor warehouse party | abc7chicago.com

Originally Posted by Slick

statistically insignificant

Slick can always be relied on to trot out every bad faith NRA spoon fed trope going.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Slick can always be relied on to trot out every bad faith NRA spoon fed trope going.

And Knobertson can always be relied on to puke up some bullshit fallacy.

Appeal to emotion - Wikipedia

Slicks priorities: dead kids < gunz.

Originally Posted by Slick

I think

No, please don't . . .

Originally Posted by panama hat

Deaths by knife or cutting instrument - 1467
Deaths by gun or similar - 39,707

2019, just the USA (as per the thread)

Boulder shooting: How the King Soopers killings unfolded during 58 minutes of terror

Originally Posted by Slick

More people are killed and injured by mass shootings with pistols as well.

End of the day you could ban rifles right now and it would do almost nothing to drive firearm deaths down.

Banning the weapon of choice for mass shooters would seem to me to be a statistically viable means of driving down the deaths due to mass shootings.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Banning the weapon of choice for mass shooters would seem to me to be a statistically viable means of driving down the deaths due to mass shootings.

Depends on how you define “mass shooting”.

Slick can always be relied on to trot out every bad faith NRA spoon fed trope going.

Originally Posted by Slick

Depends on how you define “mass shooting”.

This is fucking ridiculous:



People who are that fearful of going out in public should be disqualified from gun ownership. Interesting that he's wearing a mask though--there's seems to be some intersectionality between selfish assholes berating others for being too scared to go out without a mask and small penisies strapping deadly weapons to themselves to go to the local shops.

America's broken gun culture doesn't just tolerate deadly weapons. It celebrates them.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Banning the weapon of choice for mass shooters would seem to me to be a statistically viable means of driving down the deaths due to mass shootings.

You may as well be taking to Klondick . . . if you want to use logic

Originally Posted by Slick

More people are killed and injured by mass shootings with pistols as well.

End of the day you could ban rifles right now and it would do almost nothing to drive firearm deaths down.

So ban all firearms in public. That should be the first step.

Originally Posted by Troy

So ban all firearms in public. That should be the first step.

Wot he said

If guns are the answer ... it was a very silly question.

That said, it must be difficult for those born into a 'gun culture' like that of the USA.

Because they have never seen another way then the freedom of the right to bear arms.

There is more freedom and less fear in a 'gunless culture'.

IMHO

Originally Posted by Troy

So ban all firearms in public. That should be the first step.

Won’t do anything to stop gun crime, deaths, or mass shootings tho.

Originally Posted by Slick

Won’t do anything to stop gun crime, deaths, or mass shootings tho.

So, gun crime, deaths and mass shootings are a problem . . . and stopping the sales of guns wouldn't help. How thick are you?

Originally Posted by panama hat

So, gun crime, deaths and mass shootings are a problem . . . and stopping the sales of guns wouldn't help. How thick are you?

It certainly would have stopped that bloke who shot up the supermarket.

Originally Posted by Slick

Won’t do anything to stop gun crime, deaths, or mass shootings tho.

Egregious codswallop, so precisely not the experience of every other nation that has tried it then.

Fuck some Americans are dumb, self-centered, selfish caaaarnts: tell them affordable and decent healthcare is a communist plot and they'll cut of their own noses to spite their face (and then die from inadequate treatment or go bankrupt seeking it); tell them gun controls demonstrably work and they'd still rather live with periodic massacres than to actually do anything about it because 'Gunz!' and 'mA RiGHts!' and it's all just a little bit too hard.

Sometimes Jim just says it all

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

It certainly would have stopped that bloke who shot up the supermarket.

And would do nothing for all the other thousands and thousands of gun related deaths.

Originally Posted by panama hat

So, gun crime, deaths and mass shootings are a problem . . . and stopping the sales of guns wouldn't help. How thick are you?

How do you stop the sale of items that are protected by great granddaddy laws of a nation

Originally Posted by Slick

And would do nothing for all the other thousands and thousands of gun related deaths.

Originally Posted by Slick

How do you stop the sale of items that are protected by great granddaddy laws of a nation

The world according to Slicktard. Illiterate dribble that makes utterly no sense. Ladies and Gents this is an example of a human that suffers from Dunning-Kruger and has a double-digit IQ.