Thread: Multiple dead in shooting at Colorado supermarket

Ahmad Al Aliwi Alyssa

Originally Posted by pickel

Ahmad Al Aliwi Alyssa

Sounds like a good candidate to own an AR-15.

The brother of a Colorado man who shot and killed 10 people at a Boulder grocery store on Monday described his sibling as deeply disturbed.

Police identified the grocery store gunman as 21-year-old Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, who was shot through the leg and taken into custody after officers arrived at the scene of the shooting.

Mr Alissa’s brother spoke with The Daily Beast, calling him “very anti-social” and paranoid.

“When he was having lunch with my sister in a restaurant, he said, ‘People are in the parking lot, they are looking for me,’” the brother, Ali Aliwi Alissa, 34, said. “She went out, and there was no one. We didn’t know what was going on in his head.”

Investigators have spoken to the shooter and said they were still collecting statements. They said he is from Arvada, Colorado, and has lived the majority of his life in the US.

Boulder gunman described as ‘anti-social’ and paranoid by brother | The Independent

White = small penis syndrome
Muslim = mental illness

Is that your theory Harry?

Originally Posted by pickel

White = small penis syndrome
Muslim = mental illness

Is that your theory Harry?

My theory is that members of the public shouldn't have AR-15's pickel.

That includes tiny-dicked losers in case they have a mental breakdown, but it especially includes people who have already had one whoever they are.

And........ yet another muslim terrorist attack will go in the books as a white domestic terror attack because the guy is nominally white.

the guy is nominally white.

born in syria, and he doesn't look like a white, looks like a middle eastern swarthy to me.

On a now-deleted Facebook page, Alissa described himself as “born in Syria 1999 came to the USA in 2002. I like wrestling and informational documentaries that’s me.” He also said he was “interested in “computer engineering/ computer science.... kickboxing.” Posts about mixed martial arts, especially jiu jitsu, dominated the page. Alissa sometimes posted about Islam, often about prayer or holidays.

He shared pictures of himself in his wrestling uniform from Arvada West High, as well as wearing medals from a fighting association.

Conrad, a former wrestling teammate of the suspect’s who spoke under the condition his last name be withheld, told The Daily Beast he was deeply surprised by the allegations, but that Alissa did have a temper.

“One thing I can tell you is he didn’t take losing very well,” he said. “I remember that in wrestling. He would throw his headgear, wouldn’t talk to the coaches when he lost. If I remember correctly, even cussed out one of the coaches one time.”

In one Facebook post, the suspect appeared to express fears that someone was targeting his phone for Islamophobic reasons.

“Yeah if these racist islamophobic people would stop hacking my phone and let me have a normal life I probably could,” he posted in July 2019.

On Facebook, his politics appeared mixed throughout several camps. He shared an article rebuking Donald Trump’s stance on immigration, but also posted about his own opposition to gay marriage and abortion.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/boulde...lissa?ref=home

Yeah, another one the hysterical dipshit posters on here got wrong. Going by his social media posts he is likely a disturbed leftwinger crying about “racist islamaphobic people” and prone to violence.

Not white.

Was shot.

From Syria.

Etc etc.

Boulder '''shooter''' Ahmad Alissa, 21, was ‘paranoid’ and posted about ‘racist Islamophobes’ before '''killing 10'''

Originally Posted by Slick

Yeah, another one the hysterical dipshit posters on here got wrong. Going by his social media posts he is likely a disturbed leftwinger crying about “racist islamaphobic people” and prone to violence.

And yet he was able to purchase an extremely lethal firearm six days ago.

Makes sense that, doesn't it.

Originally Posted by Buckaroo Banzai

We don't want to take your guns away, we want them "well regulated"

“Well regulated” in historical parlance means “well equipped” “properly armed” “fully functional” etc.

People don’t like this fact and get a major case of the red ass about it, but it’s true, well known, and understood.

Originally Posted by Slick

“Well regulated” in historical parlance means “well equipped”

Umm, no. It doesn't.

Originally Posted by panama hat

Umm, no. It doesn't.

Well trained, well outfitted etc take your pick.

This particular point has been done ad nauseam and is settled in the Supreme Court.

Spin, deny, swipe, stomp your feet and cry. Changes noting.

Originally Posted by Slick

“Well regulated” in historical parlance means “well equipped” “properly armed” “fully functional” etc.

People don’t like this fact and get a major case of the red ass about it, but it’s true, well known, and understood.

Well regulated means . well regulated.
well equipped means , well equipped.
Properly armed means, properly armed
and Fully functional mend fully functional.
but regardless of any of the above
what kind of Militia did your homicidal moron brother in arms belong in?
was he a member of a well equipped militia? a member of a properly armed militia? or a fully functional militia ?
What kind of militia do you belong in ?

Originally Posted by pickel

Ahmad Al Aliwi Alyssa

of Arvada

Originally Posted by Slick

“Well regulated” in historical parlance means “well equipped” “properly armed” “fully functional”

Umm, no. It doesn't . . . in any 'parlance" . . .

Originally Posted by Slick

People don’t like this fact and get a major case of the red ass about it, but it’s true, well known, and understood

Umm, no. It's not a "fat" nor is it "true, well known, and understood" <sic>

This makes more sense and is definitely also accepted and found in "historical parlance":

Originally Posted by Buckaroo Banzai

Well regulated means . well regulated.
well equipped means , well equipped.
Properly armed means, properly armed
and
Fully functional means fully functional.

Originally Posted by Slick

You aren’t actually allowed to purchase guns if you’re a defect

True. But those have been legally identified. I am talking about the mental defects that are out and about that have no records or medical history. They can go in, fill out docs, wait out the background check and then go pick up their Assault Rifle and as much ammo as they can wheel out to their vehicle.

Assault rifles should be only sold at a few heavily monitored businesses and should also fall under a different screening process.

Originally Posted by Slick

“fully functional”

that certainly rules you out - and 40+ % of the rest of the seppo population

Originally Posted by JPPR2

the mental defects that are out and about that have no records or medical history

and the ones on prescribed medications ? opioids , ADHD drugs ?

Originally Posted by Slick

Yeah, another one the hysterical dipshit posters on here got wrong. Going by his social media posts he is likely a disturbed leftwinger crying about “racist islamaphobic people” and prone to violence.

Not white.

Was shot.

From Syria.

Etc etc.

Be honest, you thought he was white too, it's unusual that he isn't.

And it doesn't change anything regardless: people are still just as dead in another senseless mass shooting.

Originally Posted by Slick

“Well regulated” in historical parlance means “well equipped” “properly armed” “fully functional” etc.

In the historical context it also means armed with muskets.

I would suggest 'well regulated' means subject to regulations.

What is a militia?
At the time of the American Revolutionary War, militias were groups of able-bodied men who protected their towns, colonies, and eventually states. "[When the Constitution was drafted], the militia was a state-based institution," says Rakove. "States were responsible for organizing this."
What did it mean to be well regulated?
One of the biggest challenges in interpreting a centuries-old document is that the meanings of words change or diverge.




"Well-regulated in the 18th century tended to be something like well-organized, well-armed, well-disciplined," says Rakove. "It didn't mean 'regulation' in the sense that we use it now, in that it's not about the regulatory state. There's been nuance there. It means the militia was
in an effective shape to fight."
In other words, it didn't mean the state was controlling the militia in a certain way, but rather that the militia was prepared to do its duty.”




https://constitutioncenter.org/image...CNN_Aug_11.pdf

The whole originalist argument is utter BS anyways.

Nothing then applies to the world now so why pretend that it does.

Originally Posted by Cujo

I would suggest 'well regulated' means subject to regulations.

Not only you . . . most of the intelligent world would.

Originally Posted by Slick

Yeah, another one the hysterical dipshit posters on here got wrong. Going by his social media posts he is likely a disturbed leftwinger crying about “racist islamaphobic people” and prone to violence.

Not white.

Was shot.

From Syria.

Etc etc.

Boulder '&#39;'shooter'&#39;' Ahmad Alissa, 21, was ‘paranoid’ and posted about ‘racist Islamophobes’ before '&#39;'killing 10'&#39;'

I dont understand. Syrians are not white?