OhOh is so desperate for this not to be true!
Links between firms and the government have fuelled concerns that China may attempt to "leverage state-linked companies to be able to enable their espionage operations", Mr Uren said.
Those concerns were exacerbated by new laws introduced last year that required Chinese organisations assist in national intelligence efforts.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46368001
https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...se-phone-maker
Works for me.
I didn't mention any law so put the straw man away, but law or not, the point remains: Microsoft, Apple, Intel, Google etc all spy on their customers for the US government
...as you are the one making the assertion, can you provide the link to Chinese law that says their private companies must spy for the government?
ps
Your rage pm about Chairman Mao got me hard...
double post
Thanks for your belated link.
Wherein your source is:
"Tom Uren, visiting fellow in the International Cyber Policy Centre at Australia's Strategic Policy Institute,"
Whose sponsors are:
"Sponsors
ASPI highly values the generous support we receive from our Sponsors.
ICPC Sponsors
The ICPC gratefully acknowledges the generous support we receive from the following sponsors;
Gold Sponsors
Silver Sponsors
ASPI Supporters
ASPI gratefully acknowledges the support received from our Corporate Supporters;
The opinions and recommendations in material published by ASPI are intended to promote public debate and understanding of strategic and defence issues, and reflect the views of the author(s) and not those of the Australian Government or ASPI’s private sector sponsors"
https://www.aspi.org.au/sponsors
Not a whiff of bought and paid for "opinion" eh.
One wonders why the sponsors pay them?
A tray full of GOLD is not worth a moment in time.
Your point is?
How does this relate to a foreign government spying and stealing technology and installing god knows what on telecom infrastructure?
You are becoming increasingly desperate.
please provide a link to SOME sort of report backing this up. I doubt foreign governments use Google.There are two in this thread alone.
...as you are the one making the assertion, can you provide the link to Chinese law that says their private companies must spy for the government?
ps'Rage filled'? I titerally asked if you got you 50 cents (wu mao). For making that post.Your rage pm about Chairman Mao got me hard...
Thanks for confirming you know precisely nothing about this subject.
Still waiting for your link to the Chinese law which states private companies must spy for the government? ...you know just to make sure you didn't pull that out your ass while overdosing on coffee in front of Fox News.
Desperate little fuckers these two.
Here's a link to the law:
????????????_?????
Here's Article 7:
Article 7 Any organization or citizen shall support, assist and cooperate with state intelligence work in accordance with the law, and keep the secrets of national intelligence work known to the public.
The State protects individuals and organizations that support, assist and cooperate with national intelligence work.
I guess googling "chinese national intelligence law 2019" was a bit too fucking difficult for you was it? Mind you, Winnie the Pooh did rather rush it through.
I never claimed to know anything about it, which is why I ask you to enlighten me.Try this.
Still waiting for your link to the Chinese law which states private companies must spy for the government? ...
https://www.lawfareblog.com/beijings...efense-offense
Or take your pick.
https://www.google.de/search?newwind...99.xyDxPpAzPJM
Last edited by Cujo; 08-12-2018 at 05:20 PM.
If we stop testing right now wed have very few cases, if any. Donald J Trump.
At last a source from a recognised government agency albeit in Chinese but as they say, from the horsesmouth, thank you.
Using my translation app here is the Chinese to English translation:
"National Intelligence Law of the People's Republic
(Adopted at the 28th meeting of the Standing Committee of the 12th National People's Congress on June 27, 2017)
Article 7 Any organization or citizen shall support, assist and cooperate with state intelligence work in accordance with the law, and keep the secrets of national intelligence work known to the public.
The State protects individuals and organizations that support, assist and cooperate with national intelligence work."
Point one, it is a later version - 27/06/17 ('arry 1 - OhOh 0)
Point two it includes 'arrys second sentence. ('arry 2 - OhOh 0)
A resounding defeat for over hasty OhOh.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
..........
Beware the Yellow Peril.
Always vigilant.
Who says I'm trying to spell an abbreviation? ...and you're supposed to work in IT ROFL!!!! Be careful of being influenced by the posts of retards in the Brexit thread Harry.
Wait ...are you really saying it's not against the law for American companies to withhold or not report private customer information which is pertinent to matters of national security?
As has already been requested of you several times, please feel free to post the equivalent US law that says "Any organization or citizen shall support, assist and cooperate with state intelligence work" or words to that effect.
While you're at it you can look up what FUBAR means.
Is this the real reason:
Five Eyes Against Huawei
Washington has asked Ottawa to arrest Meng Wanzhou and to extradite her. This young woman is the financial director and daughter of the founder of Huawei, the Chinese Telecom Giant. She was arrested on 6 December in Canada.
The motive for the war undertaken by Washington against Huawei is deep-rooted and spurious are the justifications.
The heart of the problem is that the Chinese firm uses a system of encryption that prevents the NSA from intercepting its communications. A number of governments and secret services in the non-Western world have begun to equip themselves exclusively with Huawei materials, and are doing so to protect the confidentiality of their communications.
The covers/excuses for this war are theft of intellectual property or in the alternative, trade with Iran and North Korea, and violating rules of competition by benefitting from national subsidies.
The Five Eyes is a system of electronic espionage by Australia, Canada, the United States, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. They have begun to exclude Huawei from their auctions.
Five Eyes Against Huawei
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)