US warning allies to ditch Huawei, Chinese "spying" equipment

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

How much was your purchased phone compared to the alternatives with the same features? Or what else was your alternate reason for an Oppo phone?

I've just purchased a POCO F1 for THB 10,000. Alternates were priced at THB 30,000 to 40,000 for near identical features. At the time it was rated No. 6 in the world. It's now No. 12.

---

Wipe that fucker and put a custom ROM on it.

In fact scratch that, they hardcode the exfiltrator.

Just bin the fucking thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

. could be made vulnerable ..... The roll-out of new 5G networks also adds additional security concerns.

---

"Could be made vulnerable", compared to what? "Additional", compared to what?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Crikey you are a real muppet when it comes to reading posts before you start waffling.

---

I answered questions asked by two posters here #11 and #17 politely.

I didn't define the question.


https://teakdoor.com/attachment.php?a...id=23700&stc=1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cujo

it's the higher end telecoms infrastructure hardware.

---

What are the increased risks from using Huawei hardware, compared to other sources?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

This is not about the phones you idiot..

---

?!?!?!?!?! ...from your OP!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Already this year the US has banned government use of Huawei-made equipment and refuses to let retail stores on military bases sell Huawei handsets.

---

^Must protect my local companies profits zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz........., even if their all made in China.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by foobar

?!?!?!?!?! ...from your OP!

---

That's already been reported, and the use of the word "already" should be a clue.

Anyway, moving on to you being a silly chinky sycophant, have a look at where your new chinky phone is sending all of your data. All of it.

:rofl:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

"Could be made vulnerable", compared to what? "Additional", compared to what?



I answered questions asked by two posters here #11 and #17 politely.

I didn't define the question.


https://teakdoor.com/attachment.php?a...id=23700&stc=1



What are the increased risks from using Huawei hardware, compared to other sources?

---

The other sources aren't trying to spy.
And if you don't think the chinkies are doing their level best to steal all and any secrets they can find the U.S. using all kinds of espionage at their disposal you need to get with the program.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

That's already been reported, and the use of the word "already" should be a clue.

---

Your reply as usual makes no sense. ...could it be to obfuscate the fact you didn't read your own article?

Here is timeline so you can catch up with yourself:

1) You start a thread about phones
2) People start talking about phones
3) You go full retard and say the thread is not about phones
4) I reply, quoting your OP directly showing the thread is about phones and asking you to clarify.
5) You reply with the following non-sequitur: "That's already been reported, and the use of the word "already" should be a clue."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cujo

The other sources aren't trying to spy.

---

Mind you I suppose apart from a load of chinky brown nosing, OhOh's got fuck all worth stealing.

:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by foobar

Your reply as usual makes no sense. ...could it be to obfuscate the fact you didn't read your own article?

Here is timeline so you can catch up with yourself:

1) You start a thread about phones
2) People start talking about phones
3) You go full retard and say the thread is not about phones
4) I reply, quoting your OP directly showing the thread is about phones and asking you to clarify.
5) You reply with the following non-sequitur: "That's already been reported, and the use of the word "already" should be a clue."

---

Since we've apparently grasped the meaning of the word "already", let's see if we can get our little head around the word "now", shall we?

And we'll throw in the word "networks" in the vague hope that you can stick your two vaguely functioning brain cells together and work out the difference between that and "phones".


[QUOTE]However, there are now fears that US military bases located overseas could be made vulnerable to hacking attempts if their internet traffic travels over commercial networks in other countries built using Huawei hardware. [/QUOTE]

Take as long as you need.

:chitown:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David48atTD

CRAP. Screen had dead spots within 12 months and 1 day ... warranty was for 12 months.

---

Planned obsolescence taken to the level of perfection.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Wonder if Huawei are interfering with Androids functions then?

---

Well they do modify Android quite significantly but, like Xiaomi, they probably hide the real sniffers away somewhere offline so that they can't be erased by a Custom ROM.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Since we've apparently grasped the meaning of the word "already", let's see if we can get our little head around the word "now", shall we?

And we'll throw in the word "networks" in the vague hope that you can stick your two vaguely functioning brain cells together and work out the difference between that and "phones".

However, there are now fears that US military bases located overseas could be made vulnerable to hacking attempts if their internet traffic travels over commercial networks in other countries built using Huawei hardware.

Take as long as you need.

---

You left out the sentence before that from your OP:

Quote:

---

Already this year the US has banned government use of Huawei-made equipment and refuses to let retail stores on military bases sell Huawei handsets.

---

So it appears the thread topic is about phones?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

This is not about the phones you idiot.

Crikey you are a real muppet when it comes to reading posts before you start waffling.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by foobar

You left out the sentence before that from your OP:
So it appears the thread topic is about phones?

---

Oh look, another fucking idiot who can't read.

"Al-read-y".

:rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Switch

I did t ask, David, but I assume they don’t get so many repair requests, or they are easier to fix. Gullible me innit.��

---

Don't know TBH.
Bought at Christmas in Thailand and the Family moved to the West (:wavey: hi Nev) in January.

Couldn't be arsed going back to BangNa next time I was in Thailand to try and get it fixed.

Only paid BHT 3,000 for it

I've since bought a Samsung :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by foobar

You left out the sentence before that from your OP:



So it appears the thread topic is about phones?

---

No, it appears from what you quoted that the thread is about Huawei equipment. (Of which phones are a part)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cujo

No, it appears from what you quoted that the thread is about Huawei equipment. (Of which phones are a part)

---

And it says that they have "already" told their own staff not to use Huawei phones, but "now" they are asking governments not to use Huawei networking equipment to build their 5G networks.

What's the point with trying to explain plain English to thick people?

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/...ectid=12168527 NZ buying Huawei no more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Maanaam

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/...ectid=12168527 NZ buying Huawei no more.

---

Nor Australia, nor the US.

It seems Britain aren't doing anything because they are scared of pissing off the chinkies ahead of Brexit.

I'm sure GCHQ are keeping a watchful eye....

^Plus

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/technolog...ectid=12167963

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cujo

The other sources aren't trying to spy.

---

Sure. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cujo

you need to get with the program.

---

Rather look in from the outside and pick holes in yours and 'arrys propaganda posts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

OhOh's got fuck all worth stealing.

---

I've invested some in the locality, to be sure,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

I'm sure GCHQ are keeping a watchful eye....

---

As you well know they have concerns, as does anyone without their own development and production of any important items. They appear satisfied currently, as are the UK companies in the electronics/telecom arena. What they don't do is blindly obey the big handed man as Oceania countries do, so often.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cujo

No, it appears from what you quoted that the thread is about Huawei equipment. (Of which phones are a part)

---

Correct ...which means we both disagree with Harry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

This is not about the phones you idiot.

Crikey you are a real muppet when it comes to reading posts before you start waffling.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by foobar

Correct ...which means we both disagree with Harry.

---

No, I agree with Harry. It's not ABOUT the phones, it's ABOUT Huawei equipment which INCLUDES the phones.
Are you stupid or are you just being difficult ?

We have a thread, once again, suggesting one companies telecoms is worse that others and hence should not be allowed to be purchased and benefit the countries citizens and telecoms companies.

The OP:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Already this year the US has banned government use of Huawei-made equipment and refuses to let retail stores on military bases sell Huawei handsets.

---

A second post:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David48atTD

New Zealand's international spy agency has banned mobile company Spark from using Huawei equipment in its planned 5G upgrade,

---

The fact that both equipment and handsets (phones) are mentioned in the one or both, encourages posters to discus either or both. No puerile threats from some posters here should dissuade posters otherwise e.g. :

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cujo

No, I agree with Harry. It's not ABOUT the phones, it's ABOUT Huawei equipment which INCLUDES the phones.
Are you stupid or are you just being difficult ?

---

It would be useful if the posters here promoting the banning of a particular companies equipment and handsets, by posting such articles, could confirm how one particular company's equipment and handsets are demonstrably, allegedly, worse in terms of the any risks assessments, compared to any alternative company's equipment and handsets. If that was satisfactorily illustrated, the non technical amongst us might understand their issues.

Currently it seems to be another pure racist outburst, again.

:chitown:

'racist'. Oh FFS.

'racist'. Oh FFS.