Obviously not which is exactly what would make China very happy.
Way early days so far from a done deal.
Hell both countries are technically still at war so before anything close to reunification can begin a peace treaty needs to be hammered out. Bit of a mess as the armistice was not signed by either nation. It was an agreement signed by military leaders. Commander UN forces (USA), Commander North Korea and Commander Chinese forces.
The ageement between Kim and Moon reads like a corporate vision statement. No specifics. Will be years to agree on details. Hope it can this time be done but we are talking years.
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect,"
Unificating the time zones....
North Korea to align with South's time zone as first practical step toward reconciliation
SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea will shift its time zone 30 minutes earlier to align with South Korea starting May 5 “as a first practical step for national reconciliation and unity,” the North’s state media said Monday.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-n...-idUSKBN1I1040
Last edited by uncle junior; 30-04-2018 at 10:42 AM.
A bit of history about past reunification initiatives. Worth a read.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_reunification
Expecting a firm Korean patriarchal union?
You suggest you have stories, hangeul, public school teaching, the "only felang in the village". Expand on them tol us, put up some travel threads most like those types of threads
But no it's "Oh dear she's off on another one".
Try discussing all your "achievements" instead of boasting. You have yet to tell us of your "experience"or is it beneath you. You actually may be welcomed, but no, your boasts will continue because, as your finding out, many have and maybe live now as, the "only felang in the village", in Thailand it's not so unusual. Many have deep pockets of real achievements, you boast you have something but are unable or reluctant to tell us any of them.
That is why some here call you out, time after, time.
A tray full of GOLD is not worth a moment in time.
Posters here, of either sex we are not sexist, always call a spade, a spade.
Your postare very agressive, try another tack.
You have one friend, unfortunately you attack most.
Nobody here knows "it all", especially 'arry. We all have room for peoples opinions and rebut them is so inclined, some also point out the shallowness or yours.
Japan already has intercontinental missiles, they can launch into space.They already have the ability to produce most nuclear weapon products. They could I believe, if they wanted too, have a nuclear deterrent very quickly.
The DPRK alleged nuclear deterrent is the thing which has made all take notice. The ROK president is the game changer. Until he arrived there has been no movement towards a Korean solution. Maybe the prize is his and the DPRK's Great Leader to share. The blonde buffoon is a bystander reacting to others moves, as usual.
Care to let us know what your evidence is, that China is on the blonde buffoon's side?
Oh yeah? Oh yeah? Well, one of my good friends went there twice 3 years ago, spy cammed his immigration/customs ordeal, got wasted on soju and weed with his govt. minders and banged a buncha' N. Korean karaoke girlz,....well, ok - he paid for the pvssy - but I'm sure he has some good intel.
How will DPRK "move away from China" are the DPRK going to cut a canal using their nukes, is the DPRK and his entourage been offered asylum in Puorto Rico or are all the DPRK citizens being given ameristani gree cards?
You need to add some "second-person plural present indicatives" for effect and forgot to add, "I'm never posting here again, arseholes".
Last edited by OhOh; 30-04-2018 at 07:29 PM.
The US, China and North Korea signed the Armistice; South Korea refused.
All four would need to negotiate a formal Peace Treaty. Also, it would be nice if the US formally recognised North Korea, although it has implicitly done so by not vetoing the relevant UN declaration of NK as a member.
Then there is the small matter of restoring diplomatic relations.
But none of these are real dealbreakers IMHO.
time to liven things up this thread.
obama got a nobel peace prize before bombing libya and putting spooks into syria to support the terrorists fighting assad (causing a civil war that has killed hundreds of thousands and displaced millions).
now this:
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...ea-s-moon-says
Trump Should Win The Nobel Peace Prize, South Korea's Moon Says
NPR's Korean interpreter Se Eun Gong translates the quote from the original Korean as, "It's President Trump who should receive the Nobel Prize. We only need to take peace."
"It was signed by U.S. Army Lieutenant General William Harrison, Jr. representing the United Nations Command (UNC)"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Armistice_Agreement
ameristan acted for the UN, then from a more powerful position, than now. I suspect a unanimous vote from the UNSC will be called for to legalise the situation this time.
You know to add some strength to any treaty, rather than relying on an amerstani, here today gone tomorrow, bought and paid for, clique.
My apologise I was just "sexing up" my reply for my amusement.
Now, for clarity, how or why do you believe DPRK would want to move away from "China's influence"?
Currently the have a mutual defence agreement, wouldn't that be worth keeping? China has some recent experience of raising millions of it's citizens out of poverty, is that not something that DPRK needs assistance with? China also has oodles of cash wanting a productive role, a useful tool for DPRK to utilise?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)