On the other hand, if he hadn't escaped and haven't be dwelling in the Embassy, it have helped him to stay alive...
On the other hand, if he hadn't escaped and haven't be dwelling in the Embassy, it have helped him to stay alive...
A journalist is a person who collects, writes, or distributes news or other current information to the public. A journalist's work is called journalism. A journalist can work with general issues or specialize in certain issues.
WikiLeaks is an international non-profit organisation that publishes secret information, news leaks, and classified media provided by anonymous sources.
Let me know if you need any further help with difficult words.
^For some a journalist is a the one who trumpets the line of the establishment (he is paid by)..
Assange didin't steal anything, but he did release and publish video footage into the public domain, footage bought and paid for by the US taxpayer, footage supplied by a whistle blower within the US military, footage that depicts mass murder and war crimes on unarmed civilians including women and children, ...only a complete idiot would call that "proprietary information".
Do you check under your bed for Commies every night before going to sleep?Quote:
....he's a Russian fucking stooge.
'arry, who isn't, IYO?
I was talking about the theft of DNC emails that were the daily backdrop to the election run-in and were leaked with one aim in mind: to get baldy orange cunto past Clinton.
Like I said, he's a Russian fucking stooge.
If he wasn't on the lam he'd have his own show on RT by now.
It seems very improbable that Assange was able to hack a DNC email server using the Ecuadorian Embassy wifi with GCHQ keeping a watchful eye on their internet traffic.
It's also very unlikely the Russians would hire or need Assange to carry out such a hack.
Do you have any evidence to back up these wild, swivel eyed claims?
Lotsa innocence and redeeming establishment apologists here.
Never mind.
Both women only started talking about rape when they realised how much money they could make from selling their story to the media.
After the alleged rape, one women went out food shopping and returned to cook breakfast for Assange and called him afterwards to arrange more meetings.
The other women threw him a party after her alleged rape and continued to let him stay in her flat even though she was asked by her friends if she wanted Assange to live elsewhere, she refused the offer. By her own admission she had consensual sex after her alleged rape.
One women approached the police in a attempt to force Assange to take an STI test, the police refused but then put her under pressure to make a rape allegation.
It was only when the 2 women met by accident and compared notes, both still pissed that Assange hadn't returned their calls, both were sending text messages to each other talking about how much money they could make from selling their stories, that the rape accusations began to solidify.
Assange was interviewed several times by the police in Sweden and released without charge, which is very odd considering they already had the testimony/evidence of both women.
Assange was never told to stop at any time by either women, the most shocking thing he has been accused of was pinning one women's arms above her head while he fucked her and initiating morning sex with the other women while she was awake but had her eyes closed, again she didn't refuse or protest and made arrangements to meet him again.
This would never amount to rape under UK law so its very odd and unprecedented that the UK legal system would uphold an extradition order from Sweden based on such flimsy allegations ...unless of course there was a political motive.
Does this sound like a rapist to you Harry?
Proof 'arry not just some MSM waffle.
Any of the 13 ameristani "intelligence agencies" stuck their heads above the parapet?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqkXNBvVIhg
Proof that HoHo still hasn't learned to quote.
A healthy democracy requires transparency and journalists willing and being free to go up against the establishment without losing their liberty.
A journalist publishing a campaigning politician's emails which suggest wrong doing does not equate to theft.
Much worse was published about Trump but the electorate still voted for him, which has more to do with the intelligence and education level of your average American than anything to do with Clinton's emails, Russians or Wikileaks.
The biggest joke is the US government has hacked the emails of the entire world via PRISM, which includes the communications of many EU leaders, of course we wouldn't know any of this if it wasn't for Ed Snowden.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_...lance_program)
...& that is all before we get to how many foreign elections the US has bought, interfered with or directly installed their own puppet leaders.
I hope he does get arrested and extradited to the US.
The backlash against the UK/US government will be immense, if Trump thinks the media are against him now, wait and see what will happen if he extradites and prosecutes a well known journalist for doing nothing more than reporting facts.
Assange will have planned for every eventuality and will be ahead of the curve whatever happens.
I used to like Pilger but he's just a Russian fucking stooge nowadays as well.
Like that tosser Fisk, his hatred of the West has poisoned his mind to the point where the truth no longer matters.
Like Fisk, he tries to paint Assad the mass murderer and his backer Putin as victims rather than criminals.
And it's all nasty Saudi doing bad things in Yemen, no mention of the mad mullahs and their destabilising antics all over the Arab world.
Yeah, Pilger can fuck off as well.
He's right about one thing he said though:
"Assange is Putin's bitch".
Maybe you're a stooge of the West 'arry... :)
How easy to know: who is is a "Russian fucking stooge" and who isn't...
Pity the Australian Govt didn't have the cajones to demand he was returned to Australia May would,ve flopped. The problem is we have a prime minister with a smaller nutsack than May. The Swedish extradition case was inherently week andwould not stand up in any unbiased court of law. Assange should sue both those women into poverty. Not often you would see me agree with TDs greatest Anti American but I have seen no proof at all that Assange is a Russian stooge. To say its was wrong and illegal for him to publish sensitive documents, says we who the govt is supposed to serve, are not entitled to know at least some of the shady things govts gets up to in a democracy. If that is the case we may as well live in a China or a Russia. I cant subscribe to that theory.