Why do folk like you insist on posting when practically everything you write is drivel. You know nothing about anything.
If you actually knew something about anything at all, you would be able to be precise and specific about each or any of those things.
As it goes, my right-wing credentials are probably sounder than yours, if you actually understood what I was saying, it was that the bureaucracy failed, and that's something you agree with. It's likely that someone turned a blind eye so that he could stay on, assuming that he would be accepted eventually.
I'm all for mass-repatriation, but not fantasy-repatriation, it has to be something that actually works. It's all very well saying "send 'em home", but it won't happen unless it's realistic, and for it to be realistic, the problems at the other end need to be resolved, and that goes for the details of this case - where the guy - as a child - needed somewhere to be sent to; as it does for the mass migrations across the seas, where the source countries need to be taken over and fixed to stop the flow.
Why don't prove how superior your intellect is by actually constructing a point, rather than just giving the sales pitch inferring what a ("angry face; tight grip") genius you are?