Results 1 to 23 of 23
  1. #1
    Thailand Expat
    rebbu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    2,510

    And that's official - Ireland votes for marriage equality

    Ireland has now - officially - voted to enshrine marriage equality in the Constitution.

    The country voted by a 2:1 majority in favour of marriage equality for same-sex couples, and made global history in the process.



    Just over 62% supported changing the Constitution, with more than 1.2 million people turning out in support of marriage equality.

    National returning officer Riona Ni Flanghaile officially declared the Yes result.

    Turnout: 1,949,725

    Invalid votes: 13,818

    Valid votes: 1,935,907

    Yes: 1,201,607

    No: 734,300

    Majority in favour of the proposal: 467,307

    Just one constituency in the country voted No - Roscommon South Leitrim.

    The highest Yes vote was in Dublin South East with 74.91%. The narrowest victory came in Donegal South West at 50.05%, where just 33 votes made the difference in favour.

    Taoiseach Enda Kenny and Tánaiste Joan Burton spoke of their amazement at the result.

    Mr Kenny said: "The people went to the polls. It passed. The answer is yes - yes to their future, yes to their love, yes to their equal marriage."

    Ms Burton said: "Most of all, I'll thimnk of the children in every town, village and schoolyard who will now grow up knowing their country accepts them."

    The first same-sex marriages are some months off, but the Health Minister Leo Varadkar has promised the legislation necessary will be passed by, July allowing for marriages by the Autumn.

    Following the announcement, Yes Equality said in a statement: "Today, we are more truly a nation of equals. The people of Ireland have exercised their Constitutional right and by direct vote they have said an emphatic ‘Yes’ to Equality.

    "We now join 20 other countries where same-sex marriage has been entirely legalized. We are the first country to do so by a vote of the people.

    "This referendum was all about belonging - Irish lesbian and gay citizens had to ask the Irish people if they too can belong to Ireland and belong in Ireland. In their deep generosity the Irish people have said ‘Yes’– Yes, we belong.

    "Today’s result means that having been 'branded and isolated' for decades, each lesbian and gay person knows now that they too belong in Ireland, as full, equal citizens.

    "It means more. It means that lesbian and gay couples belong to each other in a rich, new, and profound way. That lesbian and gay parents belong anew to their children, and their children to them. And that mothers and fathers can now rest assured that their lesbian and gay children belong in the same way as all their children."

    It means that all of us – lesbian, gay, straight, family members, friends, colleagues, allies, voters – belong equally to the Irish national family."

    At the count today, shortly before the official result was announced, Senator David Norris thanked former Labour Party leader Eamon Gilmore for first putting the issue of marriage equality on the political agenda.

    And that's official - Ireland votes for marriage equality | Irish Examiner

  2. #2
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:31 PM
    Posts
    18,662
    Pog mo thoin, and they'll be able to do it now within connubial bliss.

    Fuck the pope!

  3. #3
    Thailand Expat
    rebbu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    2,510
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum
    Fuck the pope!
    Woo hoo! You go girl. You're "wing-man" can hold him while you fuck him.

  4. #4
    Thailand Expat
    wasabi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Online
    28-10-2019 @ 03:54 AM
    Location
    England
    Posts
    10,940
    There must be some new irish jokes out there, or is it only funny to laugh at straight Paddy and not the pink Paddy.

  5. #5
    Thailand Expat HermantheGerman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:22 AM
    Location
    Germany/Satthahip
    Posts
    6,692
    Welcome Ireland in the 21 Century. How does it feel not to be put in the same pot like countries...

    1 Algeria
    2 Angola
    3 Botswana
    4 Burundi
    5 Cameroon
    6 Comoros
    7 Egypt
    8 Eritrea
    9 Ethiopia
    10 Gambia
    11 Ghana
    12 Guinea
    13 Kenya
    14 Liberia
    15 Libya
    16 Malawi (enforcement of law suspended)
    17 Mauritania
    18 Mauritius
    19 Morocco
    20 Namibia
    21 Nigeria
    22 Senegal
    23 Seychelles
    24 Sierra Leone
    25 Somalia
    26 South Sudan
    27 Sudan
    28 Swaziland
    29 Tanzania
    30 Togo
    31 Tunisia
    32 Uganda
    33 Zambia
    34 Zimbabwe
    Asia, including the Middle East

    35 Afghanistan
    36 Bangladesh
    37 Bhutan
    38 Brunei
    39 Daesh (or ISIS / ISIL)
    40 India
    41 Iran
    42 Iraq
    43 Kuwait
    44 Lebanon (law ruled invalid in one court)
    45 Malaysia
    46 Maldives
    47 Myanmar
    48 Oman
    49 Pakistan
    50 Palestine/Gaza Strip
    51 Qatar
    52 Saudi Arabia
    53 Singapore
    54 Sri Lanka
    55 Syria
    56 Turkmenistan
    57 United Arab Emirates
    58 Uzbekistan
    59 Yemen
    Americas
    60 Antigua & Barbuda
    61 Barbados
    62 Belize
    63 Dominica (But see “Dominica leader: No enforcement of anti-gay law” )
    64 Grenada
    65 Guyana
    66 Jamaica
    67 St Kitts & Nevis
    68 St Lucia
    69 St Vincent & the Grenadines
    70 Trinidad & Tobago


    ??????????????

  6. #6
    Pronce. PH said so AGAIN!
    slackula's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Behind a slipping mask of sanity in Phuket.
    Posts
    9,088
    Remarkable, 2:1 is a pretty resounding statement by the voters.

    Hopefully Irish tourism will receive a nice boost from the pink dollar.

  7. #7
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,022
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
    Pog mo thoin, and they'll be able to do it now within connubial bliss.

    Fuck the pope!
    Yes, fuck the Pope.
    Certainly not for the progressive measures referred to in the OP, but for all the detrimental damage that the Roman church represents and maintains.

  8. #8
    Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    18-09-2015 @ 10:43 PM
    Posts
    220
    Quote Originally Posted by thaimeme View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
    Pog mo thoin, and they'll be able to do it now within connubial bliss.

    Fuck the pope!
    Yes, fuck the Pope.
    Certainly not for the progressive measures referred to in the OP, but for all the detrimental damage that the Roman church represents and maintains.
    Ireland is no longer under the stranglehold of the church and hasn't been for some time. I can recalll working as polling clerk on various referenda in the late 80's and early 90's (divorce and abortion). I had been told to report to a fairly rural polling station some miles out of town and all these auld biddies were coming in telling me the bishop had told them to vote no, so that's what they were going to do...that generation had their last gasp years ago and the youth of today don't see the church as having any relevance to anything.

    If anybody's interested there's an excellent book entitled "The Pope's Children", by David McWilliams an economist, which details the seismic shift in Irish society in the last 30 years...It's all about the generation who grew up in the aftermath of the Papal visit of 1979.

  9. #9
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:31 PM
    Posts
    18,662
    Quote Originally Posted by quimbian corholla View Post
    Remarkable, 2:1 is a pretty resounding statement by the voters.

    Hopefully Irish tourism will receive a nice boost from the pink dollar.
    Homesexual practices were fully decriminalised in Ireland in 1993.

    Queers from the U.S. flaunting their sexuality have been free to do so since then but I think their money is the same colour as all those who are not of that minority.

  10. #10
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 07:30 PM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    34,954
    Gays got the result they wanted but a referendum is really not the best way to go about getting a "right" for a minority.

    Seems the Parliament (law makers) passed the buck on this sensitive issue.

  11. #11
    Thailand Expat
    rebbu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    2,510
    Quote Originally Posted by HermantheGerman
    Welcome Ireland in the 21 Century. How does it feel not to be put in the same pot like countries...
    Ireland has had same sex civil partnership and since 2010.
    Square-head land still does not recognise full same sex marriage. So you should add the fatherland to your list.

  12. #12
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:31 PM
    Posts
    18,662
    The kraut obviously couldn't work out the issue under referendum.

    Not surprising when one considers their DNA.

  13. #13
    Thailand Expat Boon Mee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 04:18 PM
    Location
    Samui
    Posts
    44,704
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
    The kraut obviously couldn't work out the issue under referendum.

    Not surprising when one considers their DNA.
    You reckon there's still a few Ernst Roehms about?

  14. #14
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:31 PM
    Posts
    18,662
    Oh God, yes! Scratch a kraut and you'll find a raging poof and sexual aberrant driven by some weird atavistic lust to put his cock somewhere,anywhere but the conventional repository.

    In Aryan terms, I don't think their herrenvolk ever got over those finely sculpted, glistening thighs, rippling in dappled sunlight surmounted by bunched buttocks clenched in priapic anticipation of an oiled thrusting, as depicted by Leni Riefenstahl in her celluloid fantasy work of the 1930s.

  15. #15
    R.I.P.
    DrB0b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD
    Posts
    17,118
    Quote Originally Posted by Norton View Post
    Gays got the result they wanted but a referendum is really not the best way to go about getting a "right" for a minority.

    Seems the Parliament (law makers) passed the buck on this sensitive issue.
    No, they asked the people to decide a sensitive issue. That way nobody gets to claim the government imposed this on them and the decision reflects the will of the people. It's called democracy.

  16. #16
    Thailand Expat
    taxexile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    19,481
    That way nobody gets to claim the government imposed this on them and the decision reflects the will of the people. It's called democracy.
    why do it for gay marriage but not for decisions on income tax, vat, benefit levels, immigration quotas and the severity or the leniency of sentencing for criminal offences or any of the other issues that the public would like to have a say about.

    what is so unique about this issue that a it cant be decided by a parliamentary vote.

  17. #17
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 07:30 PM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    34,954
    Quote Originally Posted by DrB0b
    It's called democracy.
    In this particular case the yes vote was primarily due to a strong well funded yes lobby. What about minorities who do not have the means to sell their rights to equal treatment under the law?

    Historically if left to the majority of the existing electorate many minorities would not have gained voting rights, equal educational opportunity, and freedom from any other form of discrimination based on race, religion, ethnicity et al.

    Rights to equal treatment is the responsibility of law makers and an independent judicial system. Not the majority.

    I do understand the Irish Constitution requires a referendum before the Constitution can be amended. However, doesn't mean I believe it's a good way to go. Had the gay marriage vote had been a no, reckon gay folks would agree.

  18. #18
    R.I.P.
    DrB0b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD
    Posts
    17,118
    Quote Originally Posted by Norton
    In this particular case the yes vote was primarily due to a strong well funded yes lobby.
    As opposed to the poverty stricken Christian Right and the Catholic Church. Get real! Anyway what evidence do you have of that and what difference would it make, considering scale of the yes vote? Are you implying that campaigners were giving out E1000 notes for a vote - Ireland is not Isaan.

    If you're trying to say that groups on either side were funded by money from abroad, a thoroughly illegal situation,

    You mention history a lot there. Whose history are you referring to? It certainly doesn't sound like Ireland.

    This, Article 40, section 1, applicable from the foundation of the state

    All citizens shall, as human persons, be held equal before the law.
    Last edited by DrB0b; 25-05-2015 at 03:03 PM.

  19. #19
    R.I.P.
    DrB0b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD
    Posts
    17,118
    Quote Originally Posted by taxexile View Post
    That way nobody gets to claim the government imposed this on them and the decision reflects the will of the people. It's called democracy.
    why do it for gay marriage but not for decisions on income tax, vat, benefit levels, immigration quotas and the severity or the leniency of sentencing for criminal offences or any of the other issues that the public would like to have a say about.

    what is so unique about this issue that a it cant be decided by a parliamentary vote.
    Because it's dealing with fundamental rights under the constitution , the right to marry and the right to inherit. All changes or additions to the constitution must be subject to a referendum. Your other examples are legislative, not constitutional.


    The Irish Constitution is freely available online, as is Irish legislation. Feel free to consult both, you'll find your answers as to what does and does not require a referendum under Irish law there.
    Last edited by DrB0b; 25-05-2015 at 03:04 PM.

  20. #20
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 07:30 PM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    34,954
    Quote Originally Posted by DrB0b
    It certainly doesn't sound like Ireland.
    All countries have had "historical" changes to it's citizens rights. Ireland as well. At one time only male land owners could vote. Now all citizens can vote. Rights are hard fought for and need to be expanded and gaurded.

    The passing of marriage equality is a positive move to giving "all" citizens equal rights.

  21. #21
    R.I.P.
    DrB0b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD
    Posts
    17,118
    Quote Originally Posted by Norton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DrB0b
    It certainly doesn't sound like Ireland.
    All countries have had "historical" changes to it's citizens rights. Ireland as well. At one time only male land owners could vote. Now all citizens can vote.
    In Ireland all adult citizens have had the vote since the foundation of the state. There has never been a time in the history of the Republic of Ireland when we did not have universal suffrage.

    From our declaration of Independence

    The Irish Republic is entitled to, and hereby claims, the allegiance of every Irishman and Irishwoman. The Republic guarantees religious and civil liberty, equal rights and equal opportunities to all its citizens, and declares its resolve to pursue the happiness and prosperity of the whole nation and all of its parts, cherishing all of the children of the nation equally and oblivious of the differences carefully fostered by an alien government, which have divided a minority from the majority in the past

    No offence, Norton, but if you're going to talk about constitutional history in Ireland it's probably worth boning up on it.

    While we're here You mentioned that you believe that this should be a decision by the legislature and not the voters. The procedure in Ireland is that a bill stating the issue to be amended is submitted to the legislature and is then debated by them. If the bill is passed it is sent to the second house and then to the electorate for referendum, after the referendum the amendment can then be interpreted, but not amended, by the Supreme Court, if required. If the bill is not passed by the legislature it's not sent for referendum.

    AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION

    ARTICLE 46

    1 Any provision of this Constitution may be amended, whether by way of variation, addition, or repeal, in the manner provided by this Article.

    2 Every proposal for an amendment of this Constitution shall be initiated in Dáil Éireann as a Bill, and shall upon having been passed or deemed to have been passed by both Houses of the Oireachtas, be submitted by Referendum to the decision of the people in accordance with the law for the time being in force relating to the Referendum.

    3 Every such Bill shall be expressed to be "An Act to amend the Constitution".

    4 A Bill containing a proposal or proposals for the amendment of this Constitution shall not contain any other proposal.

    5 A Bill containing a proposal for the amendment of this Constitution shall be signed by the President forthwith upon his being satisfied that the provisions of this Article have been complied with in respect thereof and that such proposal has been duly approved by the people in accordance with the provisions of section 1 of Article 47 of this Constitution and shall be duly promulgated by the President as a law.
    So we have Legislature -> Electorate -> Judiciary all taking part of the process of establishing fundamental rights. Sounds pretty damn democratic to me.
    Last edited by DrB0b; 25-05-2015 at 03:45 PM.

  22. #22
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 07:30 PM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    34,954
    Quote Originally Posted by DrB0b
    There has never been a time in the history of the Republic of Ireland when we did not have universal suffrage.
    Republic of Ireland. Indeed a true statement. With minor exception.

    Ireland however not true.

    "This Irishman wanted to vote in the election of 1868. He believed that all Irish people had a right to have a say in what was happening in their country but he could not vote because he did not own a house. Only the wealthy had a vote. In 1884 he was allowed to vote for the first time. However, this right was denied to his wife, his mother, sisters and daughters because they were women."


    "Hannah Sheehy-Skeffington. Much of Hannah’s life was spent working for the right of Irish women to vote. Hannah and her friends were harassed by politicians and the police because of their efforts to ensure that women could have a voice in saying how the country should be run.
    In 1918 after a long campaign they succeeded in getting the right for women to vote. But they had to be 30 years of age and own property. In 1922 all Irish women over 21 were given the right to vote."

    It's Your Right!

    Getting off topic so I'll stfu now.

  23. #23
    R.I.P.
    DrB0b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD
    Posts
    17,118
    Quote Originally Posted by Norton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DrB0b
    There has never been a time in the history of the Republic of Ireland when we did not have universal suffrage.
    Republic of Ireland. Indeed a true statement. With minor exception.

    Ireland however not true.

    "This Irishman wanted to vote in the election of 1868. He believed that all Irish people had a right to have a say in what was happening in their country but he could not vote because he did not own a house. Only the wealthy had a vote. In 1884 he was allowed to vote for the first time. However, this right was denied to his wife, his mother, sisters and daughters because they were women."


    "Hannah Sheehy-Skeffington. Much of Hannah’s life was spent working for the right of Irish women to vote. Hannah and her friends were harassed by politicians and the police because of their efforts to ensure that women could have a voice in saying how the country should be run.
    In 1918 after a long campaign they succeeded in getting the right for women to vote. But they had to be 30 years of age and own property. In 1922 all Irish women over 21 were given the right to vote."

    It's Your Right!

    Getting off topic so I'll stfu now.
    Sorry Norton, you're talking nonsense now.

    You're talking about the United Kingdom. Ireland the landmass, not Ireland the state.

    Who do you think
    an alien government, which have divided a minority from the majority in the past
    were?

    The last line in your quote conflates two countries. In 1918 women over 30 in the UK were given the right to vote. At that time Ireland, the landmass, not the state (which didn't exist) was ruled by England. 1922 was the year Ireland became an independent state and there was Universal Suffrage from the get go.

    If you want to talk about the UK go ahead but it's not relevant to this discussion, which is about a different country.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •