Thread: Jimmy Savile Paedophile accusations

Originally Posted by Mr Lick

Peter Watt, director of child protection at the NSPCC, said: "There's no doubt that Savile is one of the most, if not the most, prolific sex offender that we have ever come across."

Coming from the NSPCC that is incredible.

No wonder the police are looking closely at his connections.

^Fucker was untouchable whilst he was alive.. Same as fat bastard Cyrille Smith MP. Despite everyone around them knowing full well what they were up to.

Connections to royalty and upper echelons, doubtful that his connections will be made public anytime soon. Until they likewise kick the bucket.

Originally Posted by kmart

Connections to royalty and upper echelons,

People keep repeating that, but there is no proof

Is that the only explanation you can think of?

other than the "fact" that a lot of people were all part of the same circle of abusers, and many of those were in positions of power

This guy is a slimebag we all know this but why is it now these women have come forward --they have seen Glitter convicted and pursued over more than 15 years and still said nothing but the Jimmy Saville thing has at last persuaded them to come forward --is there a compensation hope somewhere here

On a simple practical level where will you ever find a jury who are not aware of his perverted reputation and as with all these cases how can you really be sure about the evidence of things that happened over 30 years ago
I also suspect that there is not a single rock idol from the 60s and 70 s who is not guilty of sex with girls under 16 --groupies were everywhere then
Might we not be better spending money and time pursuing and preventing current child abuse rather than forever exhuming these skeletons which judging by some recent cases have not been provable to a juries satisfaction

Originally Posted by Drainpipe

Originally Posted by kmart

Connections to royalty and upper echelons,

People keep repeating that, but there is no proof

Is that the only explanation you can think of?

other than the "fact" that a lot of people were all part of the same circle of abusers, and many of those were in positions of power

You might find this of interest:

THIS DARKNESS MUST END: Jimmy Savile: Who was protecting him for decades, and why?

Graham Norton is the latest to be caught and the BBC are hiding his identity ...

I was thinking it might be that taff on dragon's den.

Yours is also a guess.

Just someone else's.

Still at least the Met are onto it, so no worries about thoroughness there.

Originally Posted by Joe 90

Graham Norton is the latest to be caught and the BBC are hiding his identity ...

Given that's he's as bent as a nine bob note, I doubt very much he'd be much interested in pictures of naked women.

Having said that....

The young person at the centre of a scandal over a BBC presenter reportedly paying for explicit pictures has issued a statement in which they claimed the key allegations are “rubbish”.

A prominent male BBC presenter was suspended at the weekend after allegations he spent £35,000 buying explicit images from the young person, who was allegedly 17 years old when they started talking online.

The young person’s mother made the allegations in the Sun newspaper, which published her claim that payments from the BBC presenter helped fund her child’s crack cocaine habit.

Yet in a dramatic turn of events, on Monday evening the young person’s lawyer issued a statement saying the mother and the Sun had made false claims.

The lawyer said: “For the avoidance of doubt, nothing inappropriate or unlawful has taken place between our client and the BBC personality and the allegations reported in the Sun newspaper are rubbish.”

Claims about BBC presenter are rubbish, says young person at centre of scandal | BBC | The Guardian

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Given that's he's as bent as a nine bob note, I doubt very much he'd be much interested in pictures of naked women.

Ignore that as the "young person" is in fact a boy in earlier reports.

I really hope the Sun has fucked up big time in this, but since they didn't name anyone they'd probably get away with it anyway.

Having said that, when I found out sports legend Frank Bough was caught doing a bit of whoring and coke in his BBC cardigan, he went right up in my esteem.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Ignore that…

Oh, surely everyone did, along with your weather predictions for yesterday etc.

Originally Posted by cyrille

Oh, surely everyone did, along with your weather predictions for yesterday etc.

Glad to have brightened your otherwise miserable, interminable day sybille.

Well, you seem determined to pretend that anyway, harriet.

What sort of influence will the weather in St. John's Wood have on Leeds today, do you think?



Maybe it's time you cut back on the spliff a tad?

Originally Posted by cyrille

Well, you seem determined to pretend that anyway, harriet.

What sort of influence will the weather in St. John's Wood have on Leeds today, do you think?



Maybe it's time you cut back on the spliff a tad?

I barely touch the stuff, it's lack of caffeine that's the problem.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Given that's he's as bent as a nine bob note, I doubt very much he'd be much interested in pictures of naked women.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Having said that....

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Ignore that as the "young person" is in fact a boy in earlier reports.

I really hope the Sun has fucked up big time in this, but since they didn't name anyone they'd probably get away with it anyway.

you could just edit for your first stupid post...

Originally Posted by DrWilly

you could just edit for your first stupid post...

Yes, but as with sybille, what else would you have to do with your miserable, dour existence but fill it with petty whining?

'Cut Paste Photos' certainly found its target audience.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Yes, then it wouldn't be so obvious what a pigshit thick stoner I am.

Fixed.

Originally Posted by cyrille

Fixed.

Wow sybille, you're starting early today.

Already bored?

Yet you amassing so many posts before 11:00 indicates nothing of the sort, right?



What a repetitive, pointless numpty you are, harriet.

Originally Posted by cyrille

Yet you amassing so many posts before 11:00 indicates nothing of the sort, right?



What a repetitive, pointless numpty you are, harriet.

But I give meaning to your pointless, miserable existence though. You should be grateful.