This is the kind of thing people need to be careful about.
The witness saw gunpowder on the hoodie???
Really??
Did he take a sample and have it analyzed to determine it was gunpowder?
Or has he seen gunpowder on hoodies that many times it was unmistakable.
Or did he see something he ASSUMED was gunpowder on the hoodie?
To say categorically he saw gunpowder on the hoodie is wrong.
To accept that someone said that and accept it as truth is wrong.
What is correct is he saw something that for some reason he assumed was gunpowder on the hoodie.
Has the witness ever seen gunpowder on a hoodie before?



Reply With Quote
