Neat post Whitey
I'm still convinced that Mad_Dog is IT Manager, I've seen his picture.
Printable View
Neat post Whitey
I'm still convinced that Mad_Dog is IT Manager, I've seen his picture.
I think bro mad is posting from his bedsit in Brixton, he's kinda the token black guy here, just to show that these people are actually allowed on Teakdoor, or so I understand.
You should just be glad that you are sitting in your mommy's house in England. If you were here in Thailand, you might run a risk that your bullying couldn't handle. No one attacks someone child, no one. Say what you want about me, but don't attack my son.
Dirtydog might want to rethink allowing people's kids to be attacked on a public forum. It is playing with fire, in any bar or pub, if someone attacked another person's wife or kids, there would be punches thrown.
While i do think that making derogatory remarks about someones family is out of order, i also think that if you can't handle any negative remarks being made about a child of yours then you probably shouldn't thrust a photo of your child in everybodys face by using it as an avatar. You're kind of partly to blame if it happens. Some people might make comments that you like, but not everybody on the internet is so nice and polite and you have to take the rough with the smooth. If you are really so protective of your child, it might be a good idea not to put them up on display.
I've read the above through, and i'm not quite sure how it comes across, so i'd just like to say that i'm not trying to have a go. It's just a thought that occured to me.
You misunderstand me, i'm not excusing the initial remarks or blaming him for them at all, i'm just saying that if it bothers you that negative remarks might be made, and not everyone on the internet is polite, particularly when involved in disputes that often stretch across several forums, then being protective of your child should probably also involve not holding them up for display on a public forum. That seems like common sense to me.
It's not in the same league as your rape line, maybe i shouldn't have written the blame bit as i think that has distracted you somewhat from what i was really saying.
Yeah, be careful, lots of "trolls" out there to spoil your day...
Actually, what is the job of moderators?
Maybe banning the black guy was the right thing to do? I mean, fekking ajarn banned me with less than 10 posts, and I didn't accuse anyone of raping children, but on this rare occasion it seems quite reasonable.
^ I agree.He can be a twat at times.
For the record, I never asked for him to be banned for the comments. I did message LDMA about the comments and asked him if he was allowing such comments. The defacto rule on Ajarn Forum, from the days of Everyone.net was not to flame a wife or kids.
I was always taught that only pussies and pedophiles attacked other people's children on the net. I am very concerned that mad_dog is obviously getting some kind of jollies looking at the picture of my son. Even trying his best to discern skin color and facial features. Very weird indeed. I am sure the rumors about him were wrong. I trust that he is not a pedophile and merely a pussy.
Whitey from my understanding it was you and another that started all this with wild accusations, as for posting pictures of your family on the internet I personally think it is a bad idea.
Whitey, if you really believe that mad_dog is a paedo & have evidence, then you should submit this to the appropriate authorities.
Otherwise, you & mad_dog should let the matter rest, as it will only ever be hearsay. An alternative is that you both settle this matter privately. Then you can both move on with your lives.
I think that mad_dog is a pretty reasonable guy, from any dealings I've had in the past on the internet - but, then, I don't 'know' him personally.
IMHO, there are two things in life that you don't slag off.
1.Somebodies kids
2.somebodies wife/GF
That's unless,for example that you have the balls to slag somebodies wife off face to face in ear shot of the hubby.
Not really it's more if a woman wears a short skirt she shouldn't get pissed if some one comments on her legs, kind thing. Ain't it?Quote:
Originally Posted by kingwillyhggtb
not condoning any derogatory comment on peoples kids, think it's rude and childish. But sayin' "ooh, baby!" ain't rape and "ugly fuckin' kids" ain't child abuse. (well unless you say it to their faces every day of their lives)
What I find utterly unfathomable is when somebody creates a problem on a forum, gets banned, thus eliminating the unsavoriness offending said forums members why the fuck they (offended members) gotta follow the motherfucker around the net spreading their own brand of shit.
Pot, Kettle.
Black
Unimpressed.
Shut up Quentin, the only reason you stay anonymous is due to your name and the funny, erm, erm, habits you have. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerbil
What about that black retard thingie showing evidence of others it accused of pedophilia?Quote:
Originally Posted by watterinja
The guy is a yabba addict, would you even give him the time of day? Disgusting.
"In retrospect, lighting the match was my big mistake. But I was only trying to retrieve the Gerbil," Eric Tomaszewski told bemused doctors in the Severe Burns Unit of Salt Lake City Hospital. Tomaszewski and his homosexual partner Andrew (Kiki) Farnom, had been admitted for emergency treatment after a felching session had gone seriously wrong. "I pushed a cardboard tube up his rectum and slipped Raggot, our gerbil, in." he explained. "As usual, Kiki shouted out 'Armageddon,' my cue that he'd had enough. I tried to retrieve Raggot but he wouldn't come out again, so I peered into the tube and struck a match, thinking that the light might attract him."
At a hushed press conference, a hospital spokesman described what happened next. "The match ignited a pocket of intestinal gas and a flame shot out of the tubing, igniting Mr. Tomaszewski's hair and severely burning his face. It also set fire to the gerbil's fur and whiskers which in turn ignited a larger pocket of gas further up the intestine, propelling the rodent out like a cannonball." Tomaszewski suffered second degree burns and a broken nose from the impact of the gerbil, while Farnom suffered first and second degree burns to his anus and lower intestinal tract.
There is nothing to move onto. It is up to mad_dog to let this rest, if he chooses to then all is cool. I don't believe that mad_dog is a pedo, I have stated on numerous occasions that I don't believe he is. The problem is that some ignorant people believe that saying someone isn't is saying that someone is. Mad_dog is the one who goes around flaming people. When someone flamed him, he got all upset. 6 weeks goes on and mad_dog came out of the blue attacking me using both his mad_dog account and one of his extra accounts.
Then he came crying over here about it. If he wants to let it drop, then he will. If he doesn't, then he doesn't. I ain't gonna change anything just because some guy is taking an unsavory interest in my children. He says he isn't a pedo, I don't know very many non-pedos who take this much interest in another man's children, but I trust that he is not a pedo.
And dirty dog, you know what started all of this? Mad_dog flamed me and others repeatedly over a 2 week period. Then I posted on telfwatch, and teflwatch alone, that I was refusing to post that mad_dog was a pedophile. In effect, a anti-accusation. That was not a wild accusation unless he really is a pedo.....dd, do you know something about mad_dog that the rest of us don't? Please do tell!
And as for posting my son in my avatar, I have done it for years and I refuse to change for mad_dog. A terrorist ain't gonna make me change anything, it is the terrorists that have to change, not us decent folk. I refuse to bow down to the terrorist threat. I didn't when I was up against more than 30 wanna be muslim terrorists in Yala so I sure as hell won't against some harmless pussy who sits on his mommy's computer halfway around the world and tries to act like a bully.
Truth be told, I think mad_dog is harmless. He needs attention and he shouldn't have been banned from ajarn. Heck, even teflwatch didn't ban him. I know mad_dog is really liking this attention and I don't mind giving it to him.
I know it has to be very lonely sitting so far away and wishing you were someplace else. And I am sure that if he came over this way and met me in person, he wouldn't say anything that he says here and he would be a nice chap.
So if mad_dog wants to drop it, it is all cool. If he wants more attention, I will indulge. This is Christmas, the time of giving, and every one of God's creatures deserve attention and love, including mad_dog. I will give him all I can so that he can feel important and needed.
Mad_dog, remember, God loves you!
How would you know? He does have a sort of obsession across various fora, most he got banned from, mods don't like the idea of what oversized negroes like bro mad_dog might do to little kids.Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitey
It could be worse, he could be an american negro and eat 2 boiled babies perday :)Quote:
Originally Posted by stroller
^Breaded and fried. Fuckin Brits wanna boil ever'thing...