So, Captain Hindsight, will you book me 1000/1 that gold will be worth less than now in 6 months time (in USD)?Originally Posted by Butterfly
So, Captain Hindsight, will you book me 1000/1 that gold will be worth less than now in 6 months time (in USD)?Originally Posted by Butterfly
Butters betting with monopoly moneyOriginally Posted by Butterfly
I'll also take 10/1 it'll be below $1900 USD in 6 months from now.Originally Posted by socal
I'm not trying to brag or look smart. Basically, I am very certain how this is all going to play out. I've done hours and hours of reading about this shit since 2008. I've you've went through and understood all of the material that I have, you would be just as certain as me. I've posted allot of stuff on this thread that should give a hint. I'm sure some people get it.
It is a miracle that gold is as cheap as it is.
I'm not sure how long you have followed this thread but the one caveat is the COMEX. The physical gold price is derived from the futures market. If the COMEX defaults (Somebody cannot get delivery of physical) then the contracts on the COMEX will be bust. This will show up as a plummeting gold price when really, its just a plummeting derivative price. At that point, physical will be priceless for a period of time and the emerging price will be there for all to see and it will be many multiples of what COMEX will print. As you may know, there is 100 contracts on the COMEX for every one ounce of physical gold.
But assuming the COMEX keeps it together for another 6 months then Yeah, ill take those odds.
It's good if you catch the right side. I'll never understand why these highly levered derivatives are fine and dandy in countries with strict gambling laws.Originally Posted by draco888
I'll take that bet for whatever you can handle mate 10/1 is a great bet for this prop., I could easily arbitrage it off and realise an immediate gain if were practical for us to bet.Originally Posted by socal
And I call bullshit on anyone actively 'investing' in financial markets, gold, whatever, who thinks they're not gambling. Is doesn't mean you're going to lose. You can gamble with an edge.
Last edited by 9999; 02-10-2012 at 09:00 AM.
That's like sayong "I know how this football game will pan out. I've been following the sport all my life, and know everything about these two teams intimately"....you're a bit cocky coz you called gold early Socal but sooner or later you'll be caught with your pants down making big calls purporting them as certainties.Originally Posted by socal
The point of the wager was to bet now on what will happen in 6 months. So you're willing to gamble 1/10 that COMEX 'keeps it together'?Originally Posted by socal
it's great for options trading though,Originally Posted by draco888
I watched the trades recommendations last night, I was about to buy a few low from their recommendations on ARCA, but the fucking things went up 5% in the first hours of the trade,
damn already priced out, and they are up 10% in one day
that is the beauty of it, you can find things you did not even realise existedOriginally Posted by draco888
he already has been caught by a few ladyboys!Originally Posted by 9999
Certainly in my chosen 'investment' vehicles, whenever someone is selling something, it's bogus. If it works, why sell it? Especially where liquidity is limited which not sure the case with whatever this scheme is trading. If there's was plenty of liquidity then yeah I could see why you would trade it heavily yourself and also sell the info.Originally Posted by Butterfly
Yes it looks like they are hot onto this stuff and you need a quick trigger finger. Not a game for aged men. So it probably comes down to whether or not he can realistically enter the market at the prices they recommend.Originally Posted by DrAndy
I'm sure Butters is smart enough to have he funny money platform operate in a realistic trading environment where slippage and liquidity come into play.
It must be nice to set yourself up as a trading Guru and have people follow your recommendatons
it is quite common to buy certain shares then afterwards say what a good buy they are
the price goes up, you sell and move on
Not necessarily. The loop-hole prices could be getting beaten into efficiency. In which case these type of signals aren't usually valid for very long, as the market corrects itself.Originally Posted by DrAndy
^^ Or cash in on a short-term edge, and when it is starting to correct, sell the data and info.
Hey guys, nobody here is going to post if you keep bitching about bad suggestions of a good buy.
Some people here do invest and other use as you say "monopoly" money.
If you are relying on anyone's choices here it's as the say here in Thailand "it's up to you".
This thread started with a question of if it was "wise" to invest some extra cash in some gold. So far since the start of this thread IF that person had "invested" or in reality, as we all know "gambled", they would have made a profit of 16% per year.
To some that is sufficient return. Others need to justify whether that is sufficient or why they do, or not, choose physical gold.
How you think anyone will pay out on an online bet between unknown internet posters is beyond me and frankly is a juvenile expectation.
I can confirm that I bought at £550 and the price is now £1,100. Thats a profit of £550 per once. For the three year period that's 33% profit per year.
Will it continue at that rate, who knows, but if you look at the problems around the world and the suggestions that gold will become more important for central banks to hold in higher % of their reserves the price of gold will, as some here suggest, go much higher.
If you believe gold is in the bubble stage, and at the top, it could reduce in value. To what value nobody knows. My suggestion is to take the plunge and buy physical gold but "it's up to you".
A tray full of GOLD is not worth a moment in time.
I don't think we ever intend to actually bet (though if Socal wanted a small wager I'd take him on his word - the price is worth the risk and he seems like a man of his word), the reason I asked for odds is to get an assessment, and talk about taking those odds for the purpose of discussion. There's a guy saying he'd lay 10/1 on gold being under $1900 USD in 6 months, and I'm saying that's a bargain price.Originally Posted by OhOh
I changed my physical gold into physical silver as I perceive silver as a better buy than gold right now. Personally I would not buy gold at the current price at this point in time. All over (physical) silver like a rash though.Originally Posted by OhOh
^ as you say silver appears to be making more profit at the moment but it also has a history of more volatility.
Enjoy the ride.
not necessarily. Investing doesn't mean you have the time to do proper research, and some companies will do that for you at a price, usually expensive. In a way, the research need to be separated from the actual investment, free of any interference or market pressure to conduct your research independently and properly.Originally Posted by 9999
it's more to do with PR and market commentary, basically journalists. Do they have an edge ? some might and just want to share their thoughts for a fee, a bit like Marc Faber. Who cares what he thinks really, anyone with a bit of knowledge and common sense can have the same conclusions as he does, yet some people will buy his newsletters. It's a business, the comments are not necessarily wrong or not true, but they are food for thought and digests for the ignorant and the insecure.Originally Posted by DrAndy
In my case, I am trying to call them on their BS, and I might actually be wrong because their content might be valid and a good choice for certain traders who do not have access to elaborate research and market strategies.
Last edited by Butterfly; 02-10-2012 at 10:50 AM.
not in a liquid market,Originally Posted by DrAndy
the microcap stocks were famous for price manipulation because volume was so low, another reason why following buy recommendations for a microcap illiquid stock is a major red flag. As an investor though, it could be a great bargain and an opportunity and the last thing you want is to advertise it to the world.
For larger cap companies, it's the other way around actually. If you are a research house and you don't recommend the Apple or MSFT or IBM, your clients will look at you strangely and suspiciously.
One of the mrs. out-sourcing business (I'm a silent partner) projects is doing pretty much that; simple number crunching for an investment firm. We just provide raw data though, and they use that to make their assessments.Originally Posted by Butterfly
I don't need to tell you that the sales side of investing is full of shysters, some markets more than others. We've been over boiler rooms before. Was good to see a heap of them been taken down in Thailand recently.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)