Thread: The Tramp Stamp

Yeah, cos being a bank teller is a high class job. Just ask Sabang.

Originally Posted by DrWilly

Yeah, cos being a bank teller is a high class job. Just ask Sabang.

That is not the point. The point is, 20years ago in Thailand you would be hard pushed to find a Thai girl who works in a bank with tats. Although, I would have to admit, you did and still do have the sleepers who suit up by day and soap up by night and they may have tats connected to that industry and not just as a fashion accessory.

It’s exactly the point.

There is something amiss when a cute feminine lass needs a perfect canvas permanently be spoiled by ink.

Is it insecurity that drives them to the tattoo parlour, or fashion? In both cases it’s a big no from me. Blokes wearing tats is fine because they have been doing it for years. Most military types have a least one testimonial to a drunken run ashore.

For SoCal: Flabby hookers need them to frighten children. Waste of time when the original canvas is spoiled by muffin tops at that age.

tatts on chix don't ring my bell at all.
I see years of future regret for those with full back jobbies - and a mate who does removals says its pretty difficult for good removals on the darker skinned - it leaves a white ghost. (my daughtrer has some - I hate 'em - the 'told ya so' that is coming in a few years is small consolation).

Hell even for blokes - anything beyond an anchor or a heart with "mum" is too much.

^ The worst have to be those stars on the elbows.


What sort of total idiot gets those atrocious things inked onto them forever.



Oh yeah, English Noodles has 'em.

I'm covered in tattoos. But I certainly don't want my missus to get any. I think they look shit on girls. The last one I got was a tattoo of Australia on my ass. Hurt like fuck. Then the missus said can I have one to? I said don't be so fucking stupid why would you want a tattoo of australia on yer ass. Get it on yer arm.

Who gives a shit if your tattoo looks shit at 60? Nothing looks good at 60.

Originally Posted by armstrong

Who gives a shit if your tattoo looks shit at 60? Nothing looks good at 60.

Great point Eddie

I never understood why you would get a tattoo anywhere on your body if you can not see it yourself unless you get a mirror out.

This guy probably went a bit overboard. They're real tatts and he's got mutilations to his face like the Joker did in the movie, I've seen him before in Pattaya where he is/was a bar owner.

^ have you seen Lizard man?

^Nope, don't know of any Lizard man.

Originally Posted by Headworx

^Nope, don't know of any Lizard man.

^Well we can safely assume he won't be working in many jobs where paying tax is part of the occupation

Originally Posted by johpam

I never understood why you would get a tattoo anywhere on your body if you can not see it yourself unless you get a mirror out.

I've got my name on my back and my feet for identification purposes and my daughter's birthday on my chest for remembering purposes.

Originally Posted by armstrong

I've got my name on my back and my feet for identification

How on earth will that help, you’re not the only “stupid cvnt”

Yeah but if I randomly disappeared and washed up on Pattaya beach it'd help the Thai cops (who probably killed me in the first place) identify me. Not every stupid [at][at][at][at] would go missing at the same time!

Hey, that was art guys...a butthole yes but still art! So I guess someone does have the keys