Not only denying your biased Chinese confabulation and the support you think you have on here, but also claiming to be a leader now?
How very odd for one whose opinions are so often ridiculed. You do seem to be the one slavish following a discredited country that hides behind such leadership that censors anything contrary. That would give most normal folk massive concerns, but not you it seems.
The Chinese are not well known for their probity.
Granted, there is no point you going for an IgG test as you haven't been vaccinated, have you?
You ridiculous old fucker.
P.S. My appointment is in one hour
P.P.S. The results should be back tomorrow. A reading of 0.8 is considered adequate for SARS-COV2 antibodies.
Last edited by harrybarracuda; 22-02-2021 at 07:08 PM.
You're into grinding eh Hoohoo?
Oooooooooooo Kkkkkkkkkk.
I'll go with a grindr vaccine
One of my colleagues has had the chinky shit, so I have told him to go and get the test so we can compare numbers.
^ Bravery. Taking that is as brave as flying in the new Comac C919.
This discussion is not about testing you buffoon. It about vaccines.
The % effective is based on trial results. For the Germans to suggest it might be less effective in older people is simple scare mingering. Astra Zeneca has already confirmed that the sample size for their vaccine had fewer older test subjects than other groups in their trials.
Once again you are demonstrating confirmation bias and trying to undermine the British connection out of nothing more than personal hatred, and some boneheaded backstabbing for similar, vindictive reasons.
Your facts are plucked from the same ether as your Brexit vitriol, so you don’t have much, if any, credibility on this subject.
All vaccine manufacturers are currently examining the effects of vaccines delivered so far. Try not to jump to conclusions based on your flawed opinions and personal hatred.
Wanker.
Their test group were between 18-55 years old and the efficacy of the AZ vaccine is averaged over that group, for the 55-65 years old it is extrapolated.
It is more than strange that they had so few elderly participants, it must either be that they have not understood what the most vulnerable age group is or their figures for that group are really bad.
Actually it is about testing, specifically testing the antibody count post-vaccination.
While some antibody tests - the ones that are checking yes/no - can have unreliable results, the right ELISA test is designed to to assess the actual level of antibodies.
There is still no peer-reviewed data showing that a particular antibody count grants immunity, but the general assumption is the higher, the better. There's also no data on whether the count is going to be the same for any two individuals.
Of course if I now get Covid by dint of being in the 5%, and I'm asymptomatic by dint of being vaccinated, they are never going to know that the vaccine didn't stop me getting infected but stopped me being symptomatic.
I'll post the chinky result when I hear it. And we now have people getting the AZ vaccine, too, so if I find someone's had two of those, I'll send them to get tested as well. Luckily it's free and on demand for all of us courtesy of our employer.
P.S. He's still a buffoon though.
^ Yes I saw it.
They have to make a decision about what time there should be between jabs and announce that to their customers.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)