Thread: If you've got a p----, mate, you are a bloke. If you've got a vagina you are a woman

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Well why would you when you're not the target of it.

Despite what some* will have you believe you don't often find yourself on the receiving end of such things if you're a hetrosexual white male. Which is kinda the point.





*Usually other hetrosexual white males who think that others having equal rights as them somehow makes them victims.

The Centers for Disease Control recorded 47,173 suicides in 2017, and there were an estimated 1.4 million total attempts. Many of society’s plagues strike heavier at women and minorities, but suicide in America is dominated by white men, who account for 70 percent of all cases.

So why aren't we getting the full story behind the epidemic of suicides? There are a number of factors, chief among them is the fact that reporting the truth about who's committing suicide would require acknowledging that the contemporary narrative—in which men in general and white men in particular are a universally privileged class and have no legitimate problems—is false.

That has 5/8ths of fuck all to do with the topic of this thread.

So is "Sealioning".

Originally Posted by sabang

So is "Sealioning".

Not at all, it's exactly what you keep doing.

Socal is more of a JAQing off guy, you feign politeness and ignorance to ask questions to which you can find your own answer to.

Stop it, you are Dugonging me- and I an Very upset about it. Ya crack me up.

Originally Posted by Simon43

Why the fcuk do so many potentially-interesting threads on TD descend in purile slanging matches? This is one reason why (IMHO), TD is going down the pan - it's the same of group of morons who want their 30 seconds of fame by fcuking up a thread.

The problem is if mods banned these idiots, there would be no posters left...

erm, this was not a quality thread to start with, was it Simon?

Originally Posted by TheRealKW

Sealioning

Sounds like some sort of sex fetish that the likes of Simon would do with a 300kg Western woman.

Originally Posted by Edmond

sex fetish that the likes of Simon would do with a 300kg Western woman

...cease and desist: you know PB reads these threads...

Originally Posted by TheRealKW

Not at all, it's exactly what you keep doing.

Socal is more of a JAQing off guy, you feign politeness and ignorance to ask questions to which you can find your own answer to.

Jaqing off , sealioning

Learning something new everyday

JAQing off (seems this is what you were saying Sabang is doing actually)

The act of asking leading questions to influence your audience, then hiding behind the defense that they're "Just Asking Questions," even when the underlyingassumptions are completely insane

Originally Posted by Backspin

Learning something new everyday

...how about jackassing: persisting with repetitive dreck in the face of universally negative feedback?...

Originally Posted by bsnub

Fuck off with that rubbish you twat.

Is it not scientifically true you do follow science don’t you.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Is it not scientifically true you do follow science don’t you.

Originally Posted by nidhogg

Because it denies people the right to own their identity. It is not *that* difficult a concept.

Only if their insecure in their own identity.

Originally Posted by tomcat

...how about jackassing: persisting with repetitive dreck in the face of universally negative feedback?...

Haven't had a full house of reds ounce you utter swine who has their repo turned off

Originally Posted by Backspin

Haven't had a full house of reds

Let's see if we can change that . . . but you're simply lying as usual.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Only if their insecure in their own identity.

Originally Posted by Backspin

a full house of reds ounce you utter swine

...something new: jackassing in pidgin...that'll throw 'em off...

Backspin

Thread: If you've got a p----, mate, you are a bloke. If you've got a vagina you are a woman
Go fuck yourself

...555...jackassin' with yo' reds...555...

Originally Posted by nidhogg

I can see and appreciate the arguements on both sides, which means it is all above my gay parade

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Is it not scientifically true you do follow science don’t you.

What would you know about science you denialist moron.

Well, he knows a biological male dressed as a female is not actually a woman. Should be enough to get through primary school.

Originally Posted by sabang

Well, he knows a biological male dressed as a female is not actually a woman. Should be enough to get through primary school.

Thats the problem innit. Life gets a wee bit beyond primary school, and life gets less suited to primary school vieww.

So, just out of intrest, where does someone with androgen insensitivity fit into your simplistic world view?

Originally Posted by Backspin

JAQing off (seems this is what you were saying Sabang is doing actually)

Nope, it wasn't. Yet another example of you not able to comprehend basic English.

Originally Posted by nidhogg

So, just out of intrest, where does someone with androgen insensitivity fit into your simplistic world view?

Odds on, androgen insensitivity didn't exists in the '50s.

Niddy, you made by far the best (well, only) attempt at rational explanation, so cheers.

Just a semantic point, that will fly over many heads. One doesn't actually 'own' a self identity, one assumes one. And, it can change over time.

Originally Posted by Simon43

Why the fcuk do so many potentially-interesting threads on TD descend in purile slanging matches? This is one reason why (IMHO), TD is going down the pan - it's the same of group of morons who want their 30 seconds of fame by fcuking up a thread.

The problem is if mods banned these idiots, there would be no posters left...

I agree with you, Simon.