I cannot think of a candian one either. I think you find that venezuela is not the answer for the same reason that canada isn't
That thar sounds like mooslem talk to me, boy. You one o' them thar rock-lickin' queers?Originally Posted by baldrick
...who are still around and disorganised but may help defeat the IS barbarians....Originally Posted by Dragonfly
It aint luck , they knew they could never have a para military police force and the army on the streets just to control an advanced libertarian people like us modern Europeans , so they had an deliberate immigration policy of importing only the worst filth from the worlds scumiest countries...Originally Posted by Dragonfly
it worked.
Now its time for good citizens to rise up and ethnic cleanse the continent, jail the nasty politicians and get back to normal
Perhaps this crisis will end up bringing the US and Russia together in partnership and result in multilateral nuclear disarmament. One can but hope for such a silver lining.
Where the hell is Lawrence of Arabia when you need him?
No one doubts that the Septic have made some serious fuk ups but at the same time they have made a few good calls.
Their best call was blowing the Japs back to the stone age after the evil little bastards tried to take over the world.
Their worst call was Dropping agent orange and killing untold innocents in Vietnam in the name of stopping communism in Vietnam's own country.
Their next great call will be blasting these Muslim Fanatics into outer space.
Yep, Seppos are not perfect but no country is.
I don't mind the Seppos. [/quote]
so thats why u chose to retire in jewsa.
Now its time for good citizens to rise up and ethnic cleanse the continent, jail the nasty politicians and get back to normal[/quote]
agree, but i'd go further top the fucking nasty politicians.
I posted this in another thread, but is seems to be more appropriate in this one.
"I believe I stated toward the front of this thread that it would be fine with me if we just left ISIS and that part of the world alone. There would surely be arab infighting that would keep that region of the world busy for decades.
The west just can't seem to keep their nose out of it due to one thing. OIL. If there were no oil in the region, you would see arab tribes and sects fighting each other in the same way they have for centuries. No need for interdiction.
Now that the west is entrenched there, we have brought the fight to our home countries. Who is at fault? The west is for being greedy bastards. Nobody to blame but ourselves. If we had left all alone in that region the world would not be in the mess it is now.
The west will never learn. Think about that the next time you get angry at any muslim extremists."
The muslim savages perpetrating their barbarism under the banner of their irrational and utterly bogus Caliphate kill thousands more fellow muslims than anyone else combined.
The West's alliance with Russia and China is simply a mechanism whereby the latter two regimes will manipulate suppression with cynical abandon by labelling any resistance to their oppressive governments as "terrorist" and therefore their actions will be beyond reproach.
Saudi oil and the strategic significance of the Straits of Hormuz are receding in terms of importance to the world economy as the oil glut continues and, frankly, the entire Middle East theatre will diminish accordingly in significance.
The Muslim thing will eventually become a back water, in much the same way Africa is, and simply wither on the vine of world indifference.
Maintaining existing borders between Europe and the Middle East/Africa is paramount and once Johnny Turk gets with the programme, and we cauterise Libya from contact with the outside world, we can resume the status quo.
Israel will have to learn to negotiate and detach itself itself from its past primitivism too.
Turkey will not be getting with the programe and as the Palestinians have proved for over 60 years, they cannot be negotiated with. Killing Islamist's and grinding their supporters into submission is the only answer.
Not true, though the media would like us all to believe that oil is the ulterior motive.
The driving force is of course the profit from weapons, and by extension from death and destruction. There is a minority that cares not one bit how many people die or live in sufferation, because the only way it will ever be tangible to them is an increase in their already burgeoning bank accounts.
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!"
Hmmmm, surely oil enters into the equation. Why else fight battles in that part of the world?
Reckon Richard's and Salidin's chariots needed fuel.Originally Posted by rickschoppers
And where do the funds for the wars and weapons come from, wouldn't be oil-dollars by any chance?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)