Thread: How to disagree agreeably

Do you now how to disagree agreeably? Some people seem to find it difficult. Disagree with someone and they might call you a troll. They might call you a coont, kunt, cnut or [at][at][at][at]. They might cast aspersions on your sexuality. They might make assumptions about your religion, your ancestry or even the clothes you wear. They don't know how to disagree agreeably.

What advice or suggestions do you have to disagree agreeably? How can you persuade others to follow biblical examples to "live at peace with everyone" (Romans 12:1) and "love one another as he commanded us" (1 John 3:23)?

How should we handle our differences to avoid or reduce conflict and polarisation? How can we "love" each other even when we are convinced our fellow Teak Doorian brothers and sisters are 'fookin wrong'?

I concur with the sentiments expressed but cannot agree to disagree without being outraged by such surreal beliefs.

or just ignore them. I don't post in issues for that reason.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Better to state, "I read what you are writing but if I agreed with you we would both be wrong."

Try to smile brothers and sisters.

Originally Posted by PeeCoffee

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Not really. Everybody is entitled to their own informed opinion. Otherwise they are just people talking through their ass.

Stop sending moronic, childish red repos would be a good place to stsrt OP, you immature bell end.

Originally Posted by Fozzy

Stop sending moronic, childish red repos would be a good place to stsrt OP, you immature bell end.

I hear that you are annoyed at receiving a red repo, Fozzy. My understanding is that calling someone an "immature bell end" is equally immature and does little to show one disagreeing agreeably. One might say it's 'Aberlesque'. What's your opinion about that?

Originally Posted by Fozzy

Stop sending moronic, childish red repos would be a good place to stsrt OP, you immature bell end.

I agree that setting a good example is a start to a more harmonious world, Fozzy, so how could you rephrase or re-write your post to reduce potential conflict or polarisation between us?

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by Fozzy

Stop sending moronic, childish red repos would be a good place to stsrt OP, you immature bell end.

I hear that you are annoyed at receiving a red repo, Fozzy. My understanding is that calling someone an "immature bell end" is equally immature and does little to show one disagreeing agreeably. One might say it's 'Aberlesque'. What's your opinion about that?

Nice effort, Neverna - keeping it civil in the face of extreme churlishness!

Eagerly awaiting Eggsplat/Aberlour's response.

With best regards,

PH

You are all doing it wrong.......

How to win every argument like a champ.

BERLIN – Police say a man angered by a family feud has set off explosives outside his house in Germany, killing himself and wounding seven people in a small village.

Police spokesman Thomas Rodemer said that following an argument inside his home in Homberg village in Hesse state, the 49-year-old man drove away in his car, then returned and blew himself up inside the vehicle parked outside the house.

The seven people slightly wounded by debris from the explosion included family members, neighbors and two police officers who had been called to settle the family argument. The blast also damaged neighboring homes.

Rodemer said the bomber had a license to use explosives and that police are investigating the case.

The man's name was not released in keeping with Germany's privacy law.

Man blows himself up after family feud in Germany | Fox News

Originally Posted by VocalNeal

I can't see the fascination of all the personal stuff that goes on here.

I suppose the "You're a twat" "No i'm not" is sometimes amusing but again I can't see the fascination.

Post about the subject not about the person and.....If it is obviously a troll ignore. Someone calls you a twat? Ignore. No different than being in a bar?

It all seems very puerile, albeit sometimes amusing.

To disagree agreeably you have to study Churchill, Shaw, etc..

You would ignore people who repeatedly called you a twat in a bar?

Can't fault the rest of your post.

Originally Posted by nidhogg

Originally Posted by PeeCoffee

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Not really. Everybody is entitled to their own informed opinion. Otherwise they are just people talking through their ass.

Yet, how can one be so sure that said opinion cast itself informed from independent origins, as there are no reasonable standards.


The old adage stands true: Everything you know is wrong.

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by Fozzy

Stop sending moronic, childish red repos would be a good place to stsrt OP, you immature bell end.

I agree that setting a good example is a start to a more harmonious world, Fozzy, so how could you rephrase or re-write your post to reduce potential conflict or polarisation between us?

Neverna you're a kunt you sent me a childish red ,

Originally Posted by snakeeyes

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by Fozzy

Stop sending moronic, childish red repos would be a good place to stsrt OP, you immature bell end.

I agree that setting a good example is a start to a more harmonious world, Fozzy, so how could you rephrase or re-write your post to reduce potential conflict or polarisation between us?

Neverna you're a kunt you sent me a childish red ,

So how could you rephrase or re-write your post to reduce potential conflict or polarisation between us?
And do you think there should be any change to the repo system to help improve inter-member relations?
By the way, that's a nice smiley you added. Thanks.

Originally Posted by Neverna

So how could you rephrase or re-write your post to reduce potential conflict or polarisation between us?

I believe what you are trying to do is indeed most admirable. It does seem to have got off to a somewhat shaky start, encouraging a higher degree of anger from some posters and increased stupidity from Rural Surin.
I wish you well with your venture.

I hear what you say, Chas, but in my experience, "slightly less than optimum intellectual performance" sounds a tad less confrontational than "increased stupidity".

Also, naming (and perhaps shaming) those slight under-performers might lead to angst and anger on their part and the possibility of a lob back at you and the inevitable back and forth name calling that leads to disharmony amongst our fellow TD brethren and sisterhood. Perhaps a smile and a kind word would be more appropriate in such circumstances.

Thanks for your contributions to this fascinating discussion and experiment.

By the way, I have always admired Mr Clough and the photograph in your avatar is an excellent choice (in my humble opinion).

I disagree.

Welcome, Koojo. What exactly do you disagree with?

Monkeywrenchers agreeing.

This is rich.

I suspect there might be underlying agendas in the mix.

What is a "monkeywrencher", thaimeme?

Is being called a "monkeywrencher" something to be proud of?

Originally Posted by Neverna

how could you rephrase or re-write your post to reduce potential conflict or polarisation between us?

And that's the first hurdle were people like you always fall down. There is no 'us'.

Until you begged for my attention with your repo I barely knew you existed. Other than this one, I honestly can't remember a single thread or post you've ever made. I just remember you as one of the posters who makes loads of posts in the dog house.

It's members like you that want there to be an 'us' with other members, that drag the place down.

Lonely? No friends? Bored? Who knows, pretty fucking sad though.