Thread: On the level?

I must defend piwanoi as I too am baffled by some news reports and need guidance as to their veracity.
Here's one that left me wondering . . . a la piwanoi, I'm sure it's true because it is written, or as piwanoi would say: Its trew coz it is rote:



Help me fellow TDers

The most heinous thing is that when she went on her junket to China her suite costs 9000 USD a night.

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Originally Posted by kingwilly

The fwd:fwd:fwd: in the title of the email is a clue....

Getting really desperate to try and make some thing out of nothing ain't you,but the fact remains it was still a question however which way you or any one else care to "dress it up"

I tthink the ppoint everyone is making is that it was a. Stupid question

So are you saying the whole article from start to finish was a complete load of bollocks?

Originally Posted by Gilbert

The most heinous thing is that when she went on her junket to China her suite costs 9000 USD a night.

Hey Gilbert do you think that this article is "on the level" ?Michelle Obama plans pricey trip to China on the taxpayer's dime | Mail Online

Maybe some members out there have positive proof that the whole article is a crock of shit from start to finish , just asking Is Obama marriage on the rocks? Claims of ugly fights and even a Presidential affair | Mail Online

Originally Posted by Gilbert

The most heinous thing is that when she went on her junket to China her suite costs 9000 USD a night.

Gilbert ,Here is the full Monty on your assertions Michelle Obama And Company In China Update: First Lady And Entourage Are ‘Inconveniencing Pretty Much Everyone’ - Downtrend.com

How can four piwanoi posts in a row be boring . . .

Originally Posted by kingwilly

Claiming the fifth Amendment are you ?

Originally Posted by OckerRocker

How can four piwanoi posts in a row be boring . . .

Still waiting for firm evidence that every word in the articles are a trip into journalistic fantasy land

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Still waiting for firm evidence that every word in the articles are a trip into journalistic fantasy land

Nope, it doesnt work that way.

the person making the claim must back it up. Not ask the audience to disprove a theory.

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Originally Posted by Gilbert

The most heinous thing is that when she went on her junket to China her suite costs 9000 USD a night.

Hey Gilbert do you think that this article is "on the level" ?Michelle Obama plans pricey trip to China on the taxpayer's dime | Mail Online

Just wondering why you are attacking me?

obomba and his manoid bint surely are breaking up - you can tell by the stares of pure hatred she gives to him.

I was merely saying that I couldn't care less about it, but that her wasting 9000 a night on a bed is horrendous.

Originally Posted by Gilbert

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Originally Posted by Gilbert

The most heinous thing is that when she went on her junket to China her suite costs 9000 USD a night.

Hey Gilbert do you think that this article is "on the level" ?Michelle Obama plans pricey trip to China on the taxpayer's dime | Mail Online

Just wondering why you are attacking me?

obomba and his manoid bint surely are breaking up - you can tell by the stares of pure hatred she gives to him.

I was merely saying that I couldn't care less about it, but that her wasting 9000 a night on a bed is horrendous.

Gilbert, I am sorry if you think that I am attacking you cos its anything but the case , it would appear to me that , that your story about the Chinese Junket is !00% correct according to at least 4 different articles .

Originally Posted by kingwilly

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Still waiting for firm evidence that every word in the articles are a trip into journalistic fantasy land

Nope, it doesnt work that way.

the person making the claim must back it up. Not ask the audience to disprove a theory.

Are you altogether insane? since when is asking a simple question making a claim? , maybe you can explain in your own words as to just how you came to that complete and utter fabrication .

Originally Posted by Troy

For someone who: "Only deals with facts", this is possibly not the best place to find them...

Of course not, they are too busy looking for MH370.

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by OckerRocker

I must defend piwanoi as I too am baffled by some news reports and need guidance as to their veracity.
Here's one that left me wondering . . . a la piwanoi, I'm sure it's true because it is written, or as piwanoi would say: Its trew coz it is rote:



Help me fellow TDers

Yes, there's a very real danger of this and there have been many instances of it happening. I think some of our very own members have been infected, piwani and jamiejambos for example.
How else can you explain the flawed giberish emanating from them.
The only solution is go to the Chemist and get some antivirus tablets.

I asked you a straight question in my post #28 concerning the article in the OP, which so far I have recieved no answer ,so I will ask again , are you saying that the whole article is the figment of some ones fertile imagination and a pack of lies from start to finish? , we could start off with Michelle's lavish spending first and then move on to other little dittys ,I repeat I am not saying its all the gospel thats why there is a question mark in the title of the OP ,its only you lot apart from Gilbert who mentions Michelle's high spending China junket, who think that its a trip into journalistic fantasy land

I think the consensus view here Pi, what you can take away, is
a) that only an idiot would think that an "article" from the National Inquirer is worthy of discussion as to it's merits on any level and,
b) No one really gives a fuck if O&M get divorced.


It's just like when you post paid for opinion pieces or advertorials as factual content, or when you tried to kick it off with an clip of an actor reading lines. You just don't get what makes an valid or interesting subject for debate.

Hey Koojo you might all these articles which add credence to the article in the OP about Michelle Obama's lavish spending of tax payers money on Junkets ,and of course you could do like most of the others do , completely ignore them and pretend that they do not exist https://www.google.com/#q=++New+York+times+mentions+Michelle+Obama's+lavi sh+spending+

Originally Posted by Necron99

I think the consensus view here Pi, what you can take away, is
a) that only an idiot would think that an "article" from the National Inquirer is worthy of discussion as to it's merits on any level and,
b) No one really gives a fuck if O&M get divorced.


It's just like when you post paid for opinion pieces or advertorials as factual content, or when you tried to kick it off with an clip of an actor reading lines. You just don't get what makes an valid or interesting subject for debate.

If you had read the article in the OP you would plainly see its not just about divorce .

But its still freaking trashy garbage that does not need to be in mainstream media. Gossip and innuendos is pretty much what it is. The sort of stuff that would not have even been considered when we "cue the violins" lived in a better and less crowded world.............

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by OckerRocker

I must defend piwanoi as I too am baffled by some news reports and need guidance as to their veracity.
Here's one that left me wondering . . . a la piwanoi, I'm sure it's true because it is written, or as piwanoi would say: Its trew coz it is rote:



Help me fellow TDers

Yes, there's a very real danger of this and there have been many instances of it happening. I think some of our very own members have been infected, piwani and jamiejambos for example.
How else can you explain the flawed giberish emanating from them.
The only solution is go to the Chemist and get some antivirus tablets.

Can't he just swallow the anti-virus files?

Thank you for your assistance

Originally Posted by aging one

But its still freaking trashy garbage that does not need to be in mainstream media. Gossip and innuendos is pretty much what it is. The sort of stuff that would not have even been considered when we "cue the violins" lived in a better and less crowded world.............

So according to you then all the articles in my post #44 are just garbage without a figment of truth in them, which in reality fully endorses the article in my OP ,and BTW whenever has the truth been regarded as garbage ? but of course if yourself or others have solid proof that the article in the OP and the articles in my post #44 are a crock of shit by all means produce it , but then again non of you can and that is what is eating at you ,you do not agree and yet you cannot prove me wrong can you?

Originally Posted by OckerRocker

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by OckerRocker

I must defend piwanoi as I too am baffled by some news reports and need guidance as to their veracity.
Here's one that left me wondering . . . a la piwanoi, I'm sure it's true because it is written, or as piwanoi would say: Its trew coz it is rote:



Help me fellow TDers

Yes, there's a very real danger of this and there have been many instances of it happening. I think some of our very own members have been infected, piwani and jamiejambos for example.
How else can you explain the flawed giberish emanating from them.
The only solution is go to the Chemist and get some antivirus tablets.

Can't he just swallow the anti-virus files?

Thank you for your assistance

More bollocks from Panama twat