Review the last film you watched

[Looper]

^Got a link? Can't find it.

https://www.limetorrents.info/T-34-(...-12253124.html

[Davis Knowlton]

^Thanks!

[Looper]

^You will need subs DK (unless your русский is better than mine).

This torrent has no subs.

When you open it in VLC and go to the Search For Subs window and search by title there will be no results.

You need to change the search title to 'T-34 (2018)' and then you will get one result which is a good set of subs.

[Maanaam]

No surprise that the satire eluded you.

How so? It is clear you didn't comprehend the quote and dialogue I was having with Harry.
Or are you saying that my agreeing with Harry that the pretentious and cringeworthy art world as portrayed in the movie was indeed cringeworthy shows I missed the satire of the portrayal?

Do you know him personally?

No. Do I have to know Trump personally to opine he's a crass, narcissistic buffoon?

[Humbert]

How so? It is clear you didn't comprehend the quote and dialogue I was having with Harry.

No. Do I have to know Trump personally to opine he's a crass, narcissistic buffoon?

Stop digging pal

[Maanaam]

Stop digging pal

That's a lu type response. Surprising.

So...I make an opinion of Malkovitch and you imply I may be wrong by asking if I know him personally. Yes or no?
I replied to the effect of I don't need to know him to opine he's a pretentious twat, by citing I don't know Trump and yet know (or have the opinion) that he's a crass buffoon.
How is that digging, oh master art critic who knows all?

[harrybarracuda]

You're not going to win Humbert, you know that don't you? He will wear you fucking down.

[Maanaam]

He will wear you fucking down.

With simply being correct.
I always stand to be corrected when wrong, but really get annoyed when people can't do the same...you for example, Harry.

[OhOh]

This torrent has no subs.

T-34 subs available here:

https://english-subtitles.org/106413/download/t-34.html

[kmart]

"Green Book" (2018).


Viggo Mortensen and Merhershala Ali star in an unlikely-seeming road movie (based on a true story) set in the early 60's USA.

Mortensen plays a working class Italian bouncer hired to drive cultured classical pianist Ali from New York to the Southern states to play a series of concerts.
They encounter a lot of racism and bigotry due to Ali's colour and the fact that he employs a white man to be his driver. The "Green Book" of the film title was an actual manual and rule book for negroes in transit during the early 60's..
I thought the film might turn out to be a preachy, hand-wringing sanctimonious affair, but actually it's a very funny comedy of sorts, and great story with some uncompromising language and depictions of life and times back in those days.
Mortensen and Ali play superb parts in this film, and have an excellent chemistry and script firing this film along. I really enjoyed this, could watch it again today, tbh.
9/10.

[Stumpy]

Watched Serenity with Matthew McConaughey Anne Hathaway.

Weird flick but kept me interested.

7/10

[Dragonfly]

story?

[harrybarracuda]

Watched Serenity with Matthew McConaughey Anne Hathaway.

Weird flick but kept me interested.

7/10

I'm surprised they recycled that film title so quickly.

Serenity (2005) is a great sci fi, even better if you watch the preceding series (Firefly) first.

[Stumpy]

I'm surprised they recycled that film title so quickly.

Serenity (2005) is a great sci fi, even better if you watch the preceding series (Firefly) first.

Totally different flick HB.

Baker Dill is a fishing boat captain who leads tours off of the tranquil enclave of Plymouth Island. His peaceful life is soon shattered when his ex-wife Karen tracks him down. Desperate for help, Karen begs Baker to save her -- and their young son -- from her abusive husband.

[stroller]

Serenity (2005) is a great sci fi

I found it unremarkable.

[harrybarracuda]

I found it unremarkable.

Did you watch the series first? The movie might not make as much sense if you didn't.

[harrybarracuda]

Totally different flick HB.

So why did you think I said: "I'm surprised they recycled that film title so quickly".

[BaitongBoy]

Heh...

[AntRobertson]

'You Were Never Really Here'


Brilliant film and Joaquin Phoenix great as per by jaysus what a harrowing watch.

[tomcat]

...Favourite: 2 hrs and 20 minutes of court skulduggery and silliness during Queen Anne's reign. Solid performances by Olivia Colman, Emma Stone, and Rachel Weisz: worth a watch...

[Humbert]

You're not going to win Humbert, you know that don't you? He will wear you fucking down.

Winning? Never occurred to me.
But you have to wonder about someone who bases their criticism on a film's opening credit graphics and makes assumptions about an actor's personality based upon the roles he has played. Just not very bright in my opinion.

[cyrille]

Just not very bright in my opinion

Funny you should mention that...

Favourite: 2 hrs and 20 minutes of court skulduggery and silliness during Queen Anne's reign.

Put like that, it reminds me why I just haven't got around to it yet.

[kmart]

...Favourite: 2 hrs and 20 minutes of court skulduggery and silliness during Queen Anne's reign. Solid performances by Olivia Colman, Emma Stone, and Rachel Weisz: worth a watch...

Yes. Good film with some really funny moments. The letter writing; "Dear,... C*nt!" scene was worth the price of admission alone.

[Looper]

Welcome to Marwen

Mark Hogencamp builds scale replicas of WWII battle scenes while wearing stilletos. This is a man whom I can deeply respect and relate to on many levels.

As a movie probably only interesting if you have see the documentary.

The Nazis in his model scenes represent the thugs who beat him for admitting to strutting his stuff. In his honour I vanquished the Nazis this evening using a microwave for my movie dinner.

[Maanaam]

Mark Hogencamp builds scale replicas of WWII battle scenes while wearing stilletos. This is a man whom I can deeply respect and relate to on many levels.

. Mate, are you aving a laugh at yourself?
Nothing wrong with it, but this is TD.

But you have to wonder about someone who bases their criticism on a film's opening credit graphics

You have to wonder about someone who reads an entire critique but focuses only on one aspect and point that that person made, and then bases his whole judgement of that person on the one opinion, not the entire critique...not a very objective summation, oh Great Film Appreciator, ironically.
... then considers himself above the reviewer forevermore.

makes assumptions about an actor's personality based upon the roles he has played. Just not very bright in my opinion.

My Trump analogy was obviously incromprehensible to you. Not very bright, Humbert. Are you invested in Malkovitch?
But carry on with your artsier-than-thou... I'm a plebe (with opinions), and I'm happy with my station.