Answer my question with another question.

How much do you pay your employees ?

I prefer an incentive based agreement, dont you ?

the harder you work, the more you earn?

Who sold you that lie?

how much did he pay?

He's skint isn't he?

what did he spend it all on?

Do you think he may have invested it wisely in wine, women & song ?

can he sing?

do you want him to?

what's his vocal range?

Are the hills (range) alive with the sound of music ?

Have you been to Salzburg?

Is that as tasty as a hamburg(er) ?

or a Stephan Eggburg?

Wasn't he the master racketeer?

Let me, if I could, ask you about the Civil Rights Restoration Act. In 1981, some bladdy idiot supported an effort by the Department of Education to reverse 17 years of civil right protections at colleges and universities that receive federal funds. Under the new regulations, the definition of federal assistance to colleges and universities would be narrow to exclude certain types of student loans and grants so that fewer institutions would be covered by the civil rights laws. As a result, more colleges and universities would legally be able to discriminate against people of color, women and the disabled. The efforts to narrow the protection of the civil rights laws did not stop there, however. In 1984, in Grove City v. Bell, the Supreme Court decided, contrary to the Department of Education regulation that you supported, that student loans and grants did indeed constitute federal assistance to colleges for purposes of triggering civil rights protections. But, in a surprising twist, the court concluded that the nondiscrimination laws were intended to apply only to the specific program receiving the funds and not to the institution as a whole. Under that reasoning, a university that received federal aid in the form of tuition could not discriminate in admissions but was free to discriminate in athletics, housing, faculty hiring and any other programs that did not receive the direct funds. If the admissions office didn't discriminate, they got the funds through the admission office, they could discriminate in any other place of the university. A strong bipartisan majority in both the House and the Senate decided to pass another law, the Civil Rights Restoration Act, to make it clear that they intended to prohibit discrimination in all programs and activities of a university that received federal assistance. Some arse wipes vehemently opposed the Civil Rights Restoration Act. Even after the Grove City court found otherwise, they still believed that there was, quote -- and this is their quote -- a good deal of intuitive appeal to the argument that federal loans and grants to students should not be viewed as federal financial assistance to the university. Thos bladdy idiots realized, of course, that these loans and grants to the students were paid to the university as tuition. Then, even though they acknowledged that the program-specific aspect of the Supreme Court decision was going to be overturned by the congressional legislation, the morons continued to believe that it would be, quote, too onerous for colleges to comply with nondiscrimination laws across the entire university unless it was, quote, on the basis of something more solid than federal aid to students. Judge Roberts, if his position prevailed, it would have been legal in many cases to discriminate in athletics for girls, women. It would have been legal to discriminate in the hiring of teachers. It would have been legal not to provide services or accommodations to the disabled. Do you teakdoor readers still believe today that it is too onerous for the government to require universities that accept tuition payments from students who rely on federal grants and loans not to discriminate in any of their programs or activities?

Who gives a rats ass? :sheep2:

What sort of ass do you prefer ?

a hairy one?

Would a hairy ass be a called a donkey ?

as opposed to calling it a chicken?

Do chicken have a hairy ass ?

Is that why its called a parson's nose?

I used to have a pavlov's dog album with one killer single on it.
This was about the mid seventies I guess.
What was the name of the single and what happened to them?