Luke Mitchell death: 'Don't rush judgement' lawyers urge jury in good Samaritan murder trial
Lawyers for two Thai nationals accused of murdering good Samaritan Luke Mitchell in Brunswick six years ago have urged the jury in their trial to thoroughly assess all the evidence before judging their clients.
It is alleged Thatiya Terdputham and Sarud Seehaverachat were involved in the fatal stabbing of Mr Mitchell, 29, in a convenience store car park on Sydney Road in May, 2009.
The court heard Mr Mitchell was attacked after going to the aid of another man being assaulted a short time earlier.
He died several hours later of his injuries.
Terdputham and Seehaverachart, along with a third man, Teparat Tepsut, were extradited from Thailand to face court.
Prosecutors accused them of fleeing Australia on the same day Mr Mitchell was killed.
Tepsut has since pleaded guilty to murder, and will give evidence against his two co-accused in their Supreme Court trial next week.
Today, the court heard further details from the prosecution about letters it claims Terdputham and Seehaverachart sent to the family of Mr Mitchell, apologising over his death.
They pleaded not guilty to murder.
The two men's defence teams also addressed the jury.
Appearing for Terdputham, barrister John Saunders told the court Tepsut played a greater role than was suggested by the prosecution, and told jurors it was "critical you keep an open mind".
"Don't rush to judgement," he told the court.
"It's very easy to jump to conclusions.
"But people who are frightened and under pressure do very strange things ... wait and hear the evidence."
'There was no agreement with anyone to kill': lawyer
Mr Saunders said it was not in dispute his client was drinking heavily on the night Mr Mitchell was stabbed, and that his behaviour was unruly.
"[But] there was no agreement with anyone to kill," he said.
"There was no arrangement with anyone to cause really serious injury to Luke Mitchell. That is very much in dispute."
Prosecutors have accused the men of angrily agreeing to pursue Mr Mitchell after he became involved in the earlier altercation on Sydney Road.
"As he sits in the dock before you, Thatiya Terdputham is presumed to be innocent," Mr Saunders told jurors.
"The issue is whether the Crown can prove beyond reasonable doubt that Thatiya Terdputham murdered Luke Mitchell."
Barrister Marcus Dempsey, acting for Sarud Seehaverachart, told jurors his client "did not have a knife" and "he didn't come to an agreement to assault Luke Mitchell, with people who did have knives".
Mr Dempsey urged the jury to consider the case in a "dispassionate, logical, thorough and intellectual" way, and told them that just because the two men were on trial together, did not mean that they "share one mind, one intent".
"There are two trials going on," he told the court.
Mr Dempsey said just because the men had left the country on the day Mr Mitchell died did not mean they were responsible.
"People flee for all kinds of reasons ... that is not an admission of murder," he said.
Like Mr Saunders, he told the jury it was up to the prosecution to prove his client's guilt, not for his client to prove his innocence.
"Everything you see, everything you hear, everything you assess, will be done through that prism, I assume, that he is a man innocent of the charge of murder," Mr Dempsey said of his client.
The trial will continue next week.