Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Thailand Expat misskit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Chiang Mai
    Posts
    48,121

    Mekong is half-dead

    “If the Mekong were a human, she would be half-dead, because everything has completely changed,” said Niwat Roykaew, a Goldman Environmental Prize recipient who has been leading the movement for river conservation for over 20 years.


    “This is big. The change of water level, the disappearance of sediments and the increasing level of waste. These are things that impact the river.”


    Niwat founded the Chiang Kong Conservation group in 1999, with the aim of protecting local water resources and strengthening people’s networks in the river basin.


    A transboundary issue


    When it’s about water, however, everywhere in the world is connected. Niwat realises that water issues are transnational. So, to be able to solve anything effectively, all stakeholders need to be involved. That includes the communities and governments which are connected to the river.


    “The Mekong is an international river. We can’t just talk about Thailand.”


    Niwat talked about the dams built upstream, which have impacted Thai communities downstream. He said there must be an urgent review of any megaprojects which could have a negative impact on the Mekong River, especially dams. There are 12 dams in the upper Mekong, another two in the lower Mekong and more to come.


    “The environment and nature, it can’t be a fight for resources like in the past. It has to be collaboration only,” said Niwat.


    Marc Yaggi, Waterkeeper Alliance CEO, the global network that connects communities around the world on water conservation, has the same concern that, when dealing issueswith more than one country involved.


    “Countries need to recognise that the future, the health of their people, their economy and their livelihoods are really going to depend on how they treat their shared resources. If those resources go away, there is no future.”


    “I think, at the end of the day, it’s the matter of recognising that water is the most important natural resource. We drink it or we die. We bath in it. We wash with it. We can’t grow crops without water. We have to recognise it in all its forms, rain, sleet or snow. It is critical to the atmosphere and the air we breathe. We can’t live without it. So, we have to learn how to treat it as an economic driver, instead of something we can sacrifice.”


    Niwat has seen the Mekong change over time, and not for the better. While climate change plays a part in that, he thinks the dams upstream are an even bigger factor. He sees them as accelerators of the change.


    He said he looked at the Salween River, which is also fed with runoff from the Himalayas. When Mekong began to dry up, the Salween was still rich, not dry and free flowing. For him, that’s enough evidence to say the dams have a bigger part to play in these changes than climate change.

    Urgent review that includes more local study


    “There must be open discussions about the river that (we) share,” said a concerned Niwat.


    He thinks that, if there is no more study and review, there will just be more construction, which will have an even more severe impact and it may, eventually, be too late to solve anything at all.


    Local wisdom and studies should be included. These community-based studies are usually done with the objective of learning about nature and finding the best ways to co-exist. Something Niwat thinks is totally different from a study, such as an EIA, which was done based on the intention to build anyway.


    “So far, the Mekong lacks a participatory process. Decisionmaking on development has been in the hands of governmentsand investors. There is a lot of new construction, but the main stakeholders, which is the local people, haven’t been included in decisions affecting the future of the Mekong River,” Niwat explained


    How can we be sure that authorities in different countries hear these concerns and suggestion? Marc Yaggi said that is the challenge and that is what Waterkeeper had been trying to do, build support for local communities and amplify their voices.


    It is essential that all stakeholders are included in the decision making process. At the end of the day, nature does not pick and choose who will be affected. Everyone will be effected.


    By Tulip Naksompop Blauw

    Mekong is half-dead | Thai PBS World : The latest Thai news in English, News Headlines, World News and News Broadcasts in both Thai and English. We bring Thailand to the world

  2. #2
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,565
    It is essential that all stakeholders are included in the decision making process
    It's also highly unlikely that they will be.

  3. #3
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 06:16 AM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    34,903
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    It's also highly unlikely that they will be.
    Yep. Forget cooperation between bordering nations when you can't get coorperation between bordering Colorado River states in the US.

  4. #4
    Thailand Expat
    panama hat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Last Online
    21-10-2023 @ 08:08 AM
    Location
    Way, Way South of the border now - thank God!
    Posts
    32,680
    At the end of the day each country has its own agenda . . . and in this case China dictates what happens with the river and of primary importance is their own people/economy.

    As King Louis XV said so eloquently 'après mai la déluge', quite apt as it is a river we are talking about

  5. #5
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,565
    Quote Originally Posted by Norton View Post
    Yep. Forget cooperation between bordering nations when you can't get coorperation between bordering Colorado River states in the US.
    I was more thinking about how Thai bigwigs will be looking at the money rolling in before they give a fuck about farmers' livelihoods in the north.

  6. #6
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590
    Quote Originally Posted by panama hat View Post
    At the end of the day each country has its own agenda . . . and in this case China dictates what happens with the river and of primary importance is their own people/economy.
    You’re right and the Chinese will need to keep more for themselves in the coming years.

  7. #7
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 06:16 AM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    34,903
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    I was more thinking about how Thai bigwigs will be looking at the money rolling in before they give a fuck about farmers' livelihoods in the north.
    Yep, a further impediment to progress.

  8. #8
    5 4 Knoll
    david44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    At Large
    Posts
    21,091
    Quote Originally Posted by panama hat View Post
    As King Louis XV said so eloquently 'après mai la déluge', quite apt as it is a river we are talking about
    You are forgiven for coming from the wrong side of the Rhine

    Après MOI!! svp mon ami

    One should use learned quotations as a drunkard uses a lamp post for support rather than illuimination.

    As to the substantive point I know the project well and of course the local name is Nam Mae Khong,
    Sadly twixt the so called Golden Triangle and the sacred Tibetan headwaters we have the Lacang and the ravages of the rampant Dragon siphoning off volume to the detriment of pisciculture and a series of dams in Sipsong panna (12 rice Valleys) known by the Han as Xishuangbanna prefecture in Yu nan.

    There is the very worst trickle down
    Los of control
    Dams contrary to local wishes and needs
    Loss of volume/nutrients
    Pollution
    Loss of spawning
    Lao Dams
    The Tonle Sap disaster
    The Delta I visited a few times Can Tho etc and sea level erosion at the distributaries of the mighty Mekong

    Vielleicht Habe Ich z
    u tief ins Glas schauen, oder?
    Quote Originally Posted by Latindancer View Post
    I just want the chance to use a bigger porridge bowl.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •