Originally Posted by
taxexile
your argument is flawed.
if you are going to equate the life of a human with the life of an animal then a human has just as much right to kill an animal as the animal does to kill a human.
its "natures rules" on this planet, not human sentimentality, and nature dictates that only the fittest will survival. nature in all or some of its forms will adapt and survive with a greater rate of success than humans. nature has no time for the mawkish sentimentality that affects humans.
just look at the mess created by a tiny microscopic virus as it struggles to survive. do you think the virus deserves the right to kill humans?