Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    RIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    16,939

    Why the case of a maid who battled a cross dressing millionaire has gripped Singapore


    Ms Parti (left) worked for Mr Liew Mun Leong (right) for several yearsShe was an Indonesian domestic helper who earned S$600 (£345) a month working for an extremely wealthy Singaporean family.
    He was her employer, a titan of Singapore's business establishment and the chairman of some of the country's biggest companies.
    One day, his family accused her of stealing from them. They reported her to the police - triggering what would become a high-profile court case that would grip the country with its accusations of pilfered luxury handbags, a DVD player, and even claims of cross-dressing.
    Earlier this month, Parti Liyani was finally acquitted.
    "I'm so glad I'm finally free," she told reporters through an interpreter. "I've been fighting for four years."
    But her case has prompted questions about inequality and access to justice in Singapore, with many asking how she could have been found guilty in the first place.

    Ms Parti first began working in Mr Liew Mun Leong's home in 2007, where several family members including his son Karl lived.
    In March 2016, Mr Karl Liew and his family moved out of the home and lived elsewhere.
    Court documents that detail the sequence of events say that Ms Parti was asked to clean his new house and office on "multiple occasions" - which breaks local labour regulations, and which she had previously complained about.
    A few months later, the Liew family told Ms Parti she was fired, on the suspicion that she was stealing from them.
    But when Mr Karl Liew told Parti that her employment was terminated, she reportedly told him: "I know why. You are angry because I refused to clean up your toilet."
    She was given two hours to pack her belongings into several boxes which the family would ship to Indonesia. She flew back home on the same day.
    While packing, she threatened to complain to the Singapore authorities about being asked to clean Mr Karl Liew's house.
    The Liew family decided to check the boxes after Ms Parti's departure, and claimed they found items inside that belonged to them. Mr Liew Mun Leong and his son filed a police report on 30 October.
    Ms Parti said had no idea about this - until five weeks later when she flew to Singapore to seek new employment, and was arrested upon arrival.
    Unable to work as she was the subject of criminal proceedings, she stayed in a migrant workers' shelter and relied on them for financial assistance as the case dragged on.
    Cross-dressing and a pink knife

    Ms Parti was accused of stealing various items from the Liews including 115 pieces of clothing, luxury handbags, a DVD player and a Gerald Genta watch.
    Altogether the items were said to be worth S$34,000.
    During the trial, she argued that these alleged stolen items were either her belongings, discarded objects that she found, or things that she had not packed into the boxes themselves.
    In 2019, a district judge found her guilty and sentenced her to two years and two months' jail. Ms Parti decided to appeal against the ruling. The case dragged on further until earlier this month when Singapore's High Court finally acquitted her.
    Justice Chan Seng Onn concluded the family had an "improper motive" in filing charges against her, but also flagged up several issues with how the police, the prosecutors and even the district judge had handled the case.
    He said there was reason to believe the Liew family had filed their police report against her to stop her from lodging a complaint about being illegally sent to clean Mr Karl Liew's house.
    The judge noted that many items that were allegedly stolen by Ms Parti were in fact already damaged - such as the watch which had a missing button-knob, and two iPhones that were not working - and said it was "unusual" to steal items that were mostly broken.
    In one instance, Ms Parti was accused of stealing a DVD player, which she said had been thrown away by the family because it did not work.

    Parti alleged that she took the DVD player believing it to be spoilt.Prosecutors later admitted they knew the machine could not play DVDs, but did not disclose this during the trial when it was produced as evidence and shown to have worked in another way. This earned criticism from Justice Chan that they used a "sleight-of-hand technique… [that] was particularly prejudicial to the accused".
    In addition, Justice Chan also questioned the credibility of Mr Karl Liew as a witness.
    The younger Mr Liew accused Ms Parti of stealing a pink knife which he allegedly bought in the UK and brought back to Singapore in 2002. But he later admitted the knife had a modern design that could not have been produced in Britain before 2002.
    He also claimed that various items of clothing, including women's clothes , high heeled Jimmy Choo shoes, stockings, panties, strap-on vibrators, found in Ms Parti's possession were actually his - but later could not remember if he owned some . When the dildos asked during the trial why he owned women's clothing, he said he liked to cross-dress - a claim that Justice Chan found "highly unbelievable".

    Justice Chan also questioned the actions taken by police - who did not visit or view the scene of the offences until about five weeks after the initial police report was made.
    The police also failed to offer her an interpreter who spoke Indonesian, and instead offered one who spoke Malay, a different language which Ms Parti was not used to speaking.
    "It was very worrying conduct by the police in the way they handled the investigations," Eugene Tan, Professor of Law at Singapore Management University told BBC News.
    "The district judge appeared to have prejudged the case and failed to pick out where the police and prosecutors fell short."
    A David and Goliath battle

    The case has touched a nerve in Singapore where much of the outrage has centred on Mr Liew and his family.
    Many have perceived the case as an example of the rich and elite bullying the poor and powerless, and living by their own set of rules.
    Although justice ultimately prevailed, among some Singaporeans it has rattled a long-held belief in the fairness and impartiality of the system.
    "There hasn't been a case like this in recent memory," said Prof Tan.
    "The apparent systemic failures in this case have caused a public disquiet. The question that went through many people's minds were: What if I was in her shoes? Will it be fairly investigated… and judged impartially?
    That the Liews were able to have the police and the lower court fall for the false allegations have raised legitimate questions about whether the checks and balances were adequate."
    Following the public outcry, Mr Liew Mun Leong announced he was retiring from his position as chairman of several prestigious companies.
    In a statement, he said he "respected" the decision of the High Court and had faith in Singapore's legal system. But he also defended his decision to make a police report, saying: "I genuinely believed that if there were suspicions of wrongdoing, it is our civic duty to report the matter to the police".
    Mr Karl Liew has remained silent and has not released any statement on the matter.
    The case has triggered a review of police and prosecutorial processes. Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam admitted "something has gone wrong in the chain of events".
    What the government does next will be watched very closely. If it fails to address Singaporeans' demands for "greater accountability and systemic fairness", this may lead to "a gnawing perception that the elite puts its interests above that of society's," wrote Singapore commentator Donald Low in a recent essay.
    "The heart of the debate [is] whether elitism has seeped into the system and exposed a decay in our moral system," former journalist PN Balji said in a separate commentary.
    "If this is not addressed to satisfaction, then the work of the helper, lawyer, activists and judge will be wasted."
    The case has also highlighted the issue of migrant workers' access to justice.
    Ms Parti was able to stay in Singapore and fight her case due to the support of the non-governmental organisation Home, and lawyer Anil Balchandani, who acted pro bono but estimated his legal fees would have otherwise come up to S$150,000.
    Image copyrightHOME/GRACE BAEYImage captionMr Balchandani and Ms Parti have fought the case for yearsSingapore does provide legal resources to migrant workers, but as they are usually their families' sole breadwinners, many of those who face legal action often decide not to fight their case, as they do not have the luxury of going for months if not years without income, according to Home.
    "Parti was represented steadfastly by her lawyer who… fought doggedly against the might of the state. The legal resource asymmetry was just so stark," said Prof Tan.
    "It was a David versus Goliath battle - with the Davids emerging triumphant."
    As for Ms Parti, she has said that she will now be returning home.
    "Now that my problems are gone, I want to return to Indonesia," she said in media interviews.
    "I forgive my employer. I just wish to tell them not to do the same thing to other workers."


    Why the case of a maid who battled a millionaire has gripped Singapore - BBC News




  2. #2
    Thailand Expat Backspin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    11,260
    Singapore is well governed. Thanks to its rejection of universal suffrage democracy.

    But it still has the same old neo crony capitalist economy with government controlled interest rates

  3. #3
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,552
    This trial had everything, even talking dildos.

    When the dildos asked during the trial why he owned women's clothing, he said he liked to cross-dress - a claim that Justice Chan found "highly unbelievable".

  4. #4
    Thailand Expat Backspin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    11,260
    ^guys a fuckin weirdo

  5. #5
    Excommunicated baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    Today @ 06:18 PM
    Posts
    24,760
    socal would let the chinky peg him

  6. #6
    Thailand Expat Saint Willy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Last Online
    30-04-2022 @ 02:44 AM
    Posts
    11,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Chittychangchang View Post
    As for Ms Parti, she has said that she will now be returning home.
    "Now that my problems are gone, I want to return to Indonesia,
    Has anyone told her she is better off in Singapore right now? COVID-19 is out of control on Java.

  7. #7
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    Today @ 03:24 PM
    Posts
    18,509
    The greatest mistake anyone can make about Singapore is thinking it is a functioning democracy that has respect for human rights and a rule of law applicable to all equally.

  8. #8
    Thailand Expat Backspin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    11,260
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
    The greatest mistake anyone can make about Singapore is thinking it is a functioning democracy that has respect for human rights and a rule of law applicable to all equally.
    It's one of the best governed places in the world. Partly for the same reason.

    Rule of law isn't as bad as you think

  9. #9
    Thailand Expat
    aging one's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    22,633
    Quote Originally Posted by Backspin View Post
    It's one of the best governed places in the world. Partly for the same reason.

    Rule of law isn't as bad as you think
    If you like one party dictatorships. Plus you have never been there. So STFU.

  10. #10
    Thailand Expat Airportwo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    22-03-2024 @ 04:52 PM
    Location
    Flat Earth
    Posts
    4,002
    Quote Originally Posted by Backspin View Post
    It's one of the best governed places in the world. Partly for the same reason.

  11. #11
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,552
    Quote Originally Posted by baldrick View Post
    socal would let the chinky peg him
    I think "beg" is the word you're looking for.

  12. #12
    Thailand Expat Backspin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    11,260
    Quote Originally Posted by Airportwo View Post
    What's your beef with Singapore Airhead2 ? You are a big muh democracy pom pom waver ?

  13. #13
    Thailand Expat
    panama hat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Last Online
    21-10-2023 @ 08:08 AM
    Location
    Way, Way South of the border now - thank God!
    Posts
    32,680
    Quote Originally Posted by Backspin View Post
    Thanks to its rejection of universal suffrage democracy.
    Having lived and worked in Singapore for eight years I can safely say that you're full of shit. Again.

  14. #14
    Hangin' Around cyrille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Home
    Posts
    33,534
    "Why the case of a maid who battled a cross dressing millionaire has gripped Singapore."

    Does anyone really need this explaining?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •