Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Out there...
    StrontiumDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    BKK
    Posts
    40,030

    Single-airport policy ends: Don Mueang to be used for more budget flights

    Single-airport policy ends | Bangkok Post: news

    Single-airport policy ends

    Don Mueang to be used for more budget flights

    The government will scrap its single-airport policy and encourage low-cost carriers to shift to Don Mueang airport to help ease congestion at Suvarnabhumi airport.


    World weary travellers

    People wait in long queues at the check-in counters inside crowded Suvarnabhumi airport yesterday. The government plans to move low-cost, chartered and non-connecting flights to the old Don Mueang airport to ease congestion.
    SOMCHAIPOOMLARD

    Transport Minister Jarupong Ruangsuwan yesterday said expanding Suvarnabhumi would take at least five years. In the meantime, Don Mueang could easily handle more than 16 million passengers a year, helping relieve pressure at Suvarnabhumi.

    "Don Mueang airport will continue for the near future. It's clear that the single-airport policy isn't practical due to the problems of congestion," Mr Jarupong said.

    "I don't want to say we are adopting a dual-airport policy. But for the long term, we must put Don Mueang to use." Don Mueang, officially opened for commercial service in 1924, was replaced as Bangkok's main international airport in 2006 with the opening of Suvarnabhumi.

    Don Mueang reopened for commercial services this month after being shut for four months due to last year's floods.

    Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra has said incentives should be offered to encourage low-cost airlines to shift to Don Mueang.

    Mr Jarupong, quoting the prime minister, said seven to nine low-cost and chartered airlines could ultimately move to the older airport.

    Suvarnabhumi is expected to handle 51 million passengers this year, up from 47.2 million in 2011 and well beyond its designed capacity of 45 million. Flight delays of 15-30 minutes have been increasingly common in recent months, while passengers complain of lengthy queues at check-in and immigration counters.

    Authorities have long discussed plans to build a second terminal, satellite terminals and two new runways to help double Suvarnabhumi's passenger and cargo handling capacity.

    Previous policies called for Don Mueang's eventual closure, with former transport minister Sukumpol Suwanatat saying in December that Suvarnabhumi should be Bangkok's sole airport.

    Airline executives expressed reservations over the latest policy change.

    Orient Thai founder Udom Tantiprasong said policy clarity was needed from the government.

    "It is more convenient to operate from Don Mueang than Suvarnabhumi, but the point is that a clear policy is needed. The government shouldn't mention a single-airport approach one day then change later."

    Mr Udom said Orient Thai has had to move its operations three times in recent years, with staff forced to relocate each time.

    The flooding at Don Mueang late last year was another concern, he said, adding that the government needed to clearly explain its flood prevention plans for the airport.

    Tassapon Bijleveld, chief executive officer of Thai AirAsia, said he did not strongly oppose the relocation policy but would wait and see if the government would come up with reasonable incentives. He agreed that relocation to Don Mueang would pose many problems, including negative impacts on staff who had already relocated to be near Suvarnabhumi.

    Since Don Mueang reopened on March 6, only Nok Air has resumed operations there. Airports of Thailand Plc has tried to woo both Orient Thai and Thai AirAsia to Don Mueang _ with no success _ to help ease traffic at Suvarnabhumi.

    Airlines say one major obstacle is a long-standing policy calling for Don Mueang to service only point-to-point domestic services. The policy was set by the Surayud Chulanont government in 2007 as part of its decision to reopen Don Mueang following the opening of Suvarnabhumi the previous year.

    If all three major budget airlines _ AirAsia, Nok Air and Orient Thai _ shifted to Don Mueang, it would reduce passenger loads at Suvarnabhumi by up to 17 to 18 million a year.

    Airlines are also concerned about overseas tourists who may be forced to transit between the two airports.
    "Slavery is the daughter of darkness; an ignorant people is the blind instrument of its own destruction; ambition and intrigue take advantage of the credulity and inexperience of men who have no political, economic or civil knowledge. They mistake pure illusion for reality, license for freedom, treason for patriotism, vengeance for justice."-Simón Bolívar

  2. #2
    Thailand Expat
    taxexile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    19,478
    let the typical thai style clusterfuck of chaos, mismanagement and non co-operation begin.
    with as always, the consumer losing out.

  3. #3

    R.I.P.


    dirtydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Pattaya Jomtien
    Posts
    58,763
    Quote Originally Posted by StrontiumDog
    If all three major budget airlines _ AirAsia, Nok Air and Orient Thai _ shifted to Don Mueang, it would reduce passenger loads at Suvarnabhumi by up to 17 to 18 million a year.
    These budget airlines seem to be raking it in, 17 to 18 million passengers per year from Bangkok?

  4. #4
    Member
    Bettyboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:50 AM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    34,348
    As we know, it's political - Newin wanted a single airport hence his shirft to the other side and his attempts to get abhisit onside; to abhisit's credit he never fully allowed Nevin to complete his plans for the new airport (i.e. to spend all the money possible on it alone...).

    The dual airport is normal in most major cities, works well (especially if the 2 are well linked together, but Heathrow/Gatwick/City/Stansteand/Luton are not...).
    Cycling should be banned!!!

  5. #5
    Thailand Expat
    good2bhappy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last Online
    11-11-2018 @ 05:44 PM
    Location
    Klong Samwa
    Posts
    15,308
    so a new airlink will need to be built
    lovely more pockets lined

  6. #6
    Member
    Bettyboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:50 AM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    34,348
    ^ I don't think they will; the taxis will wanna manage the transfers... to be fair, this is the norm most places in the world; would be nice to have a good airport link bus service too.

  7. #7
    Thailand Expat
    taxexile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    19,478
    where will the immigration officers come from to work at don muang, why not just increase the number off officers at suwannaphum.

  8. #8
    Member
    Bettyboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:50 AM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    34,348
    THe new airpost really has been a failure in so many ways (not the prime reason for its construction - that was a massive success...), the old airport just seemed to function better...

    I like the old airport, may need some redressing though.

  9. #9
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 11:59 PM
    Posts
    18,653
    Thai long term planning is of course oxymoronic.

    They knew that capacity at Swampy in its current form was to be reached within 4 years of opening, hence the new satellite plans, so why did they not rationalise use earlier and retain loco carriers, charters and domestic at Don Meuang?

    Any international travel hub the size of Bangkok with its domestic and regional networks cannot be sustained by one airport unless of course its planned capacity of 100 million passengers was met from day one.

    The super duper roof at Swampy designed to reduce airconditioning costs by providing areas shaded from the sun's rays doesn't work. It has to be the hottest tropical airport I've ever travelled through.

  10. #10
    Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last Online
    21-01-2013 @ 01:30 PM
    Posts
    217
    Suvarnabhumi opened less than 8 years ago and it's already over capacity.

    The last 8 years saw steady growth in passenger numbers, but it was not even close to Thailand's full growth potential (there was the coup, airport occupation, two red shirt protest, floods, and the financial crisis). Despite all that, the airport is *still* over-capacity? Planning fail.

    It's not particularly wise to open Don Muang again, and I doubt AirAsia would be very eager to move there (they're by far the largest LCC -- Nok Air is much smaller, and Orient Thai marginal).

  11. #11
    Thailand Expat
    BobR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    19-03-2020 @ 02:26 AM
    Posts
    7,762
    ^ Been to Manila, Been to LAX? Over capacity or not, Soyouwannaboomboom is not that bad an airport.

    What about Utapao? It could handle a substantial number of flights, and many of the tourists are going to Pattaya anyway. It's very under-used.

    It's difficult to blame the regional carriers for not wanting to locate elsewhere, they would be at a competitive disadvantage against the big airlines that remained at Suvarnbhumi, no one will want to take a connecting flight if it means picking up your luggage and being bused to another airport.

  12. #12
    Member
    tayto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Online
    21-03-2023 @ 04:33 AM
    Posts
    186
    A question.
    Does anyone know of a good link ,bus or minivan from Don Muang airport to Suvarnabhum airport.
    Thanks

  13. #13
    Thailand Expat
    aging one's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    22,690
    Air Con Bus 554. Dont forget the Rail link was meant to link the two airports halfway in to its plan it was switched to its location now through Pratunam.

    Good open back up. Closer and easier for me.

  14. #14
    Member
    Roger Ramjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    07-10-2022 @ 03:15 PM
    Location
    high in the sky!
    Posts
    309
    At present.......If you are arriving at International arrivals at Swampy...allow at least two hours in the present "immigration shuffle" to make it to luggage collection...and take "carry on only" or you stand a good chance of some Indian peasant taking it out with him while you are trapped!!

    I arrived on the 3rd March at 8pm Thai Airways 1st Class, with overseas clients who had never been to Thailand before. No fast track...Spent one hours and fifty minutes shuffling with hordes of Indians into the gates....Two lines only one Immigration official most of the time...took frequent breaks, and just put up "closed" sign and left a full queue!!!.....And of course your 1st class "priority luggage" choofing around on the luggage conveyor waiting to be "walked off with" and finally placed on the floor as a new flight arrrived and was allocated the conveyor!!!

    A week later ...arrived at Swampy from Shanghai, 8th March at 11.00am ......another two hours ten minutes wait to get through Immigration to baggage collection! Only one of each pair of gates was again manned....and processing very slowly!

    OVERALL PERSPECTIVE: Staff all seemed on an intentional "go slow" with no idea of gettting rid of the queues of very disgruntled sheep. There was no one to replace officers taking a 15 minute"break"...they just put up a "closed sign" and departed at will leaving a full queue.....What a disgrace for the Thai Government...Send all the pollies to China..to see how it should work.....much stricter on Visas and entry but rarely more than 2 or 3 minutes wait...Thailand is going backwards!!! They need to pay them a 100 Bhart per sub 1 minute processing bonus....and all would be fixed!

  15. #15
    Thailand Expat
    DrAndy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    25-03-2014 @ 05:29 PM
    Location
    yes
    Posts
    32,025
    Quote Originally Posted by StrontiumDog
    I don't want to say we are adopting a dual-airport policy. But for the long term, we must put Don Mueang to use
    sounds like a dual policy

    Quote Originally Posted by StrontiumDog
    The government shouldn't mention a single-airport approach one day then change later
    true, it shouldn't but it is a different set of grasping paws in charge

    I agree that the lo-cost airlines should be forced to relocate, as they were at KL

    and ThaiAirways can move a lot of its flights there too

    but the buslink should be more frequent and maybe a rail link put in place
    I have reported your post

  16. #16
    The Pikey Hunter
    Gerbil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Roasting a Hedgehog
    Posts
    12,355
    I hope Yinglack has cleared this new policy with the boss. After all Swampy was his pride & joy.....

  17. #17
    Thailand Expat
    Lostandfound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Online
    21-04-2024 @ 03:51 PM
    Posts
    4,119
    Who'd have thought it. Airasia being sidelined now that Shincorp is no longer a major shareholder

  18. #18
    Out there...
    StrontiumDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    BKK
    Posts
    40,030
    Don Mueang airport set for B60m revamp | Bangkok Post: news

    Don Mueang airport set for B60m revamp

    Non-aviation activities suspended for upgrade

    Don Mueang airport has put its non-aviation activities on hold as it prepares to serve more budget airlines being switched from crowded Suvarnabhumi airport.

    Airport director Kanpat Mangkalasiri said yesterday that all non-aviation activities have been suspended.

    The airport needs to concentrate on improving its facilities to receive more budget airline flights. The government wants to divert flights to Don Mueang to relieve congestion at Suvarnabhumi.

    Gp Capt Kanpat said the improvements would cost about 60 million baht, subject to approval from the Airports of Thailand.

    "At least five to seven airlines will come [to Don Mueang] because it is convenient here with 18 aerobridges for them. The airlines will enjoy equal privileges," he said.

    Terminal 1, previously reserved for international flights at Don Mueang, is currently reserved for Nok Air and chartered flights.

    The investment in terminal improvement should generate an annual income of at least 1 billion baht at Don Mueang airport.

    The dual-airport policy should raise the number of passengers at Don Mueang from 4 million at present to 11.5 million within the next year. Terminal 1 can handle up to 14.5 million passengers per year, while the adjacent Terminal 2 can serve up to 10 million.

    Don Mueang generates about 80 million baht annually, which nearly covers its operating costs. It posts an annual loss of 300 million baht.

    Gp Capt Kanpat said the government's decision to switch some flights to Don Mueang would allow it more time to expand Suvarnabhumi.

    Transport Minister Jarupong Ruangsuwan said Don Mueang airport should be put to more use to create income and ease congestion at Suvarnabhumi.

    Thai Airways International (THAI) president Piyasvasti Amranand supports the dual-airport policy. He said projects to expand Suvarnabhumi would take at least five years to materialise and could face many obstacles.

    THAI will not move its flights to Don Mueang because they must connect to international flights, he said. If THAI sets up a budget airline, it could be based at Don Mueang.

    Tassapon Bijleveld, chief executive of Thai AirAsia, said the airline operates flights, many to international destinations, out of Suvarnabhumi. He wanted to see what incentives the government could offer for the airline to relocate to Don Mueang. "The government's proposals and conditions will be considered carefully. They must make clear that after the relocation there will not be a reversal of policies again."

    Udom Tantiprasongchai, chief adviser to Orient Thai Airlines, said he did not object to the policy of putting Don Mueang to greater use. He would wait for a clear direction from the government in terms of the improvement to infrastructure at the old airport.

    Marisa Pongpattanapun, chairwoman of the Airline Operators Committee, disagrees with the policy. She said it would affect international passengers switching to domestic flights as it could take up to four hours from landing at Suvarnabhumi to boarding at Don Mueang.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •