The deaths in Iraq were 100% preventable.
Printable View
The deaths in Iraq were 100% preventable.
A black man goes into a 7-11, pulls a gun, kills the clerk. He's wearing a ski mask and a jacket.
We should round up all blacks (because a few conceal guns under their jackets), torture them until they confess about future armed robbery plans by other blacks, ban the wearing of ski masks, and ban the sale of jackets.
Public security comes first you know!
Go to bed - take a valium but please construct better anologies when you return?:rolleyes:
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2006/08/36.jpg
<facitous>
Is it any different? How many Americans die per year at the hands of Muslims in the USA? How many die at the hands of Christians? How many at the hands of blacks? Which group is responsible for the most deaths, averaging 6,000 kills per year?
</facitious>
What about them?Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Chuchok
Could have been prevented if Bush had listened to intelligence before 9/11. ;)
So they were Iraqis, were they?Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Chuchok
Irrelevent, look at the risk presented by groups of people.
You're assuming all Muslims are terrorists, so, I'm assuming all blacks are murderers. Capice?
How many Americans were killed by Muslims in America in 2005?
How many Americans were killed by blacks in America in 2005?
How many Americans were killed in general by Americans in 2005?
And some of us are worried about a few women who wear burqas because in some country far away a few might blow up a bus?
Ah, the Minority Report logic again.
Now you are being a complete tit.
so now a religion equates to a skin colour??
Let me tell you a little secret.In most religions, it does not matter whet skin colour people are.kow Jai?
I demand that you either appoligise or piss off from posting togeather.kow jai?
I mean, I might have slandered your true name...perish the thought!
Good God, I never said they were the same.
I don't think logic comes into it at all.Quote:
Ah, the Minority Report logic again.
If you wanna talk about cricket, boozing, or chicks, lil' chuck is an alright sort of guy, anything else, forget it.
Fashions in the USA change from year to year. Blondes, big tits, and big asses come and go. But the burka that's meant to carryover from year to year as a habitual practice. It's a uniform and mask meant to depersonalize women and strip them of their individual identity. Women wearing a burka become part of the background to be overlooked not noticed. They become a nonentity. It subordinates and denigrates women and it aknowledges men's right to incite violence on women. It legitimizes rape. Fashion is for amusement and is part of the mating ritual to attract a partner. The burka is designed to intimidate and repress women.
edited: this post is in reference to posts #172 and #174 found here - https://teakdoor.com/issues/9588-i-wa...tml#post230670
My browser shows this post from attaboy as post #222 on page 6 of the thread.
It's also the only post worth reading on this page. Of all the threads in issues, this one's gone down the crapper the quickest. RIP.
Including yours?Quote:
Originally Posted by RDN
Practionors of Islam called the public identification and distinction of others Dhimmi. Non-Muslims were required to wear items which identified them as such in order that they could be provided protection against discrimination and violence. They were also required to pay a tax to cover the cost for this special consideration provided to them. The Taliban impossed the custom in Afghanistan requiring non-Muslims to wear yellow armbands.
Dhimmis were allowed to "practice their religion, subject to certain conditions, and to enjoy a measure of communal autonomy" and guaranteed their personal safety and security of property, in return for paying tribute to Muslims and acknowledging Muslim supremacy.
Dhimmi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia