Any doubts about Climate Change?

**S Landreth** · 02-06-2016, 03:10 AM

May 2016 satellite data from a science denier,………

global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for May, 2016 is +0.55 deg. C, down 0.16 deg. C from the April value of +0.71 deg. C

Looks like one of the hottest Mays on record to me

_______________

More news,….

‘Fundamentally unstable’: Scientists confirm their fears about East Antarctica’s biggest glacier

Scientists ringing alarm bells about the melting of Antarctica have focused most of their attention, so far, on the smaller West Antarctic ice sheet, which is grounded deep below sea level and highly exposed to the influence of warming seas. But new research published in the journal Nature Wednesday reaffirms that there’s a possibly even bigger — if slower moving — threat in the much larger ice mass of East Antarctica.

The Totten Glacier holds back more ice than any other in East Antarctica, which is itself the biggest ice mass in the world by far. Totten, which lies due south of Western Australia, currently reaches the ocean in the form of a floating shelf of ice that’s 90 miles by 22 miles in area. But the entire region, or what scientists call a “catchment,” that could someday flow into the sea in this area is over 200,000 square miles in size — bigger than California.

Moreover, in some areas that ice is close to 2.5 miles thick, with over a mile of that vertical extent reaching below the surface of the ocean. It’s the very definition of vast.

Warmer waters in this area could, therefore, ultimately be even more damaging than what’s happening in West Antarctica — and the total amount of ice that could someday be lost would raise sea levels by as much as 13 feet.

“This is not the first part of East Antarctica that’s likely to show a multi-meter response to climate change,” said Alan Aitken, the new study’s lead author and a researcher with the University of Western Australia in Perth. “But it might be the biggest in the end, because it’s continually unstable as you go towards the interior of the continent.”

_____________

Artic Sea Ice

______________

Keeling Curve

_______________

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Climate Scam

I guess we’ll never see any science from you and I think everyone understands why. I have a question for you,………what is the color of the string you use?

**pseudolus** · 02-06-2016, 05:01 AM

Originally Posted by S Landreth

I guess we’ll never see any science from you and I think everyone understands why

Still waiting to see some real science from you that is not written by a phd student, not taken from a policy document written prior to as study being completed, and not based upon the assumption that no climate change is natural.

Aside from that you banker shill, do you have anything else up your sleeve?

Totten - interesting you scammers move to this one after ALL of your predictions for greenland and West Antarctic Ice Sheet failed to materialize. All stable there, with no change and no 10 ft wall of water wiping out the netherlands. So the scammed move to Totten so you can spread some more picutres and predictions that will never come true either. Alas though at current melting rates Totten is good for another 3000 years. Hmmmm

Hardly surpring thought as all this bad science you promoted here comes from the Eric Rignot. Now would it surprise you to know that Eric is in the pocket of the BIGGEST OIL MONEY there is? Hmmmm

Here - rather than cut and pasting your shite and from them hoping you get some sort of prestige or what ever the fuck you trust fund wasters thinks that gives you, try looking at Eric Rignot, one of the IPCC big boys we well, his connections to https://www.climatecommunication.org...s/eric-rignot/ and who is the major funder of that.

Frauds. Eric is Big Oil, and not your poxy koch brothers either - the real big boys. No wonder he is so high up in the Maurice Strong Rockefeller eugenicists gang.... he's one of their boys.

Next?

Just for kicks, one of your climate scam turds, give us the names of your most trusted, most noble, most cleaner than clean "scientists' and I'll show you their proper BIG OIL funding in about 20 minutes.

**pseudolus** · 02-06-2016, 12:53 PM

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture17447.html

So the report that Totten scare story is an aussie university collective, with the funding coming from the Grantham INstitute. That itself gets all of its funding from Hedgefund Manager which has massive stock holdings in Exxon Mobil..... always comes back to the Oilgarchy every time doesn't it? They also have massive holdings in philip morris as well. Such a concerned man he is, looking to protect the people of the world with his "climate scam" foundation in LSE.

**Takeovers** · 02-06-2016, 01:18 PM

Originally Posted by pseudolus

eh, why are ewe not allowed to look at other causes of climate change

They have looked at potential other causes of cimate change as thoroughly as they looked for CO2. They are scientists, you know.

**HermantheGerman** · 02-06-2016, 01:30 PM

15 Photos Of Devastating Floods Show What The Future Of Europe Could Look Like
Thanks to climate change, flooding across Europe is expected to double by 2050.

KAI PFAFFENBACH/REUTERS

A damaged car is pictured Monday after floods in the town of Braunsbach, Germany.
Heavy rains flooded huge parts of northern Europe over the weekend as “freak thunderstorms“ ravaged the continent and left as many as five people dead.

In Poland, one man was struck dead by lightning. In Germany, two men were presumed dead after being sucked into a flooded underpass, and two others perished in flood-related accidents. Dozens were injured in lightning strikes at a children’s birthday party in Paris and a soccer match in Germany.

The French Open canceled games on Tuesday — its first complete washout in 16 years, according to France24. Auto giant Audi halted production at one of its major factories in southwestern Germany.

The storm systems were prompted by a warm plume of air that extended north from Africa into Europe, according to the U.K.’s Met Office.

The devastation caused by the flooding shows the vulnerabilities that even wealthy countries face as global warming causes the climate to change and weather to become more extreme.

“We cannot predict climate on a local scale 10 years ahead or even further, but we can put a lot more effort on extracting the information on what could be happening in that far-away abstract future by looking at the extremes that happen today,” Bart van den Hurk, a doctor at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, said in a report published last week by the European Commission.

A study released in March 2014 found that the frequency of severe flooding across Europe is expected to double by 2050. The annual economic costs from that flood will go up nearly fivefold, the study found.

There are no clear estimates yet of the cost of the damage caused by this round of flooding. But these photos show some of the devastation so far:

A policewoman stands near a car smashed against a building on May 31, 2016, in the village center of Braunsbach, Germany, following a ferocious flash flood the night before. The flood tore through Braunsbach, crushing cars, ripping corners off houses and flooding homes during a storm that hit southwestern Germany. Miraculously no one in Braunsbach was killed, though three people died as a result of the storm in other parts of the country.

A man looks at a flooded car on a street on May 30, 2016, in Oberhausen after a heavy storm. At least four people died and several more were injured in the south of Germany after torrential storms caused severe flooding, with a third person also feared dead, authorities said on Monday.

A man stands among boulders, smashed trees and cars and other debris that cover a street May 31, 2016, in the village center of Braunsbach following a furious flash flood the night before.

A car is blocked in the middle of a flooded road on May 31, 2016, in Meung-sur-Loire southern Orleans, following heavy rainfalls, as the Loiret department is under flood alert and France’s weather agency Meteo France maintained 18 departments under orange alert.

This photo shows a barge and a boat on the river Seine on Quai de la Tournelle after its banks became flooded following heavy rainfalls May 31, 2016, in Paris.

Rescuing firefighters patrol aboard a dinghy through the flooded town of Bruay-la-Buissiere, near Lens, northern France, on May 31, 2016, following heavy rainfalls.

Dark clouds hang over a grain field near Petersdorf, northeastern Germany, on May 30, 2016.

People stuck in traffic walk along the A10 highway on May 31, 2016, in Saran, after it flooded due to heavy rainfall. The Loiret department is under red flood alert and France’s weather agency Meteo France maintains 18 departments are under orange alert.

Cars are seen on May 31, 2016, amid rubble piled up by the floods after a thunderstorm in Braunsbach, southern Germany. Cleanup efforts started after violent storms with torrential rains caused severe flooding, killing four people the day before.

A woman stands next to her flooded house on May 31, 2016, in Meung-sur-Loire southern Orleans, following heaving rainfalls.

A fireman crosses a flooded road with a person on his back following heavy rainfalls on May 31, 2016, in Meung-sur-Loire southern Orleans, as the Loiret department is under flood alert.

People clear mud from a flooded store in the village center following a furious flash flood the night before on May 30, 2016, in Braunsbach, Germany.

Cars stand amid rubbish in a flooded street in Braunsbach, southern Germany, on May 30, 2016. Four people died and several more were injured in southern Germany after violent storms with torrential rains caused severe flooding, authorities said.

A picture taken on May 31, 2016, in southern Orleans shows a flooded road following heavy rainfalls that disrupted traffic on the A10 highway between Paris and Orleans.

Cars are seen in a flooded street in Schwäbisch Gmünd, Baden-Württemberg, southern Germany, after heavy rains hit the country on May 29, 2016. Three people died and several were injured after heavy rains in the country, officials said on May 30, 2016.

15 Photos Of Devastating Floods Show What The Future Of Europe Could Look Like

Climate Change This Week: Tragic Drought in Africa & India, New Clean Power Strides, and More!

**pseudolus** · 03-06-2016, 11:58 PM

UK's £6bn climate finance pledge is welcome ? but not its fair share | Environment | The Guardian

The UK’s £5.8bn ($8.8bn) pledge to help poor nations cope with climate change falls short of the country’s fair share of the burden and the efforts of other European leaders, campaigners have said.

Very nice of them to dole out tax payer money for this. But who are they actually handing it to? Lets have a little look shall we? I wonder if Tim Gore, Oxfam’s lead advisor on climate change policy knows? (hmmmm now there just has to be a blood connection there somewhere to your spiritual leader ConMan Al Gore).

Well, it is going to the GREEN CLIMATE FUND under the UN. However, it is not just a pot of cash that is going to dole out goodies to the poor is it? Oh no. ", it will involve a combination of private and public capital, as well as contributions from development banks."

So bankers do not GIVE money away, and the eugenicist elite wouldn't either for the purposes stated. But the tax payers are having their money GIVEN away to top up this pot.

So what is thie GREEN FUND going to do with the money? Solar power? Something to fight Co2? Surely there must be something like this. After all.... to fight MAN MADE CLIMATE CHANGE>....

Building Resilience of Wetlands in the Province of Datem del Marañón in Peru, with Profananpe (GCF funding: USD 6.2 million)

Scaling Up the Use of Modernized Climate Information and Early Warning Systems in Malawi, with UNDP (GCF funding: USD 12.3 million)

Increasing the Resilience of Ecosystems and Communities through the Restoration of the Productive Bases of Salinized Lands, in Senegal, with CSE (GCF funding: USD 7.6 million)

Climate Resilient Infrastructure Mainstreaming in Bangladesh, with KfW (GCF funding: USD 40 million) - Only 12 million of the cash is being used to build stuff, the rest is gifted and frittered away on a load of bullshit.

KawiSafi Ventures Fund in Eastern Africa, with Acumen (GCF funding: USD 25 million)

Energy Efficiency Green Bond in Latin America and the Caribbean, with IDB (GCF allocation: USD 217 million)

Supporting Vulnerable Communities to Manage Climate Change Induced Water Shortages, in Maldives, with UNDP (GCF funding: 23.6 million)

Urban Water Supply and Wastewater Management in Fiji, with ADB (GCF funding: USD 31 million)

You can actually trawl through lots of documents for these. The Fiji one is enlightening, because, well, I hate to break it to you, , it clearly shows that this whole fund is just another BANKSTER racket, enslaving a nation with interest bearing debt, which has been created by the bank (owned by the rich countries who have been plundering countries like Fiji for years) etc etc

I would suggest you lovely flag waving CLIMATE SCAM believers would gi and read for yourself, but you won't. You will just post up more "we're all going to die and be buried under snow and rain and freeze to death or burn up" or what ever rubbish you are spouting this week, and at the same time, more tax payers money is being gifted to these criminals.

Well done tossers.

**pulvarien** · 04-06-2016, 12:56 AM

Climatedepot.com is a web site specializing in revealing how the green/extreme socialists corrupt scientific data. There is article after article revealing how they do it and why they do it. It is an immense site and shocked me when I began reading it over a decade ago. The articles are scientific, political and historical and revealing. The authors are not oil company paid whores. The sheer depth, and complexity of what is really going on is revealing about the left wing and if you spend the time reading articles over a few months will open your eyes slowly but surely as to what is going on in the world. Sadly most don't have this kind of time.

Heres an example, In US elections theres only the democrats and republicans, theres no green party to vote for, why is that? The dems have bought the greens lock stock and barrel. What did they pay for this? Look at the EPA first, under the Obama administration all 3 of the epas directors have been hard core greens. The first was forced to resign after it was discovered she had set up a secret and illegal communications network between all the greens inside the US govt and outside greens in the EPA. After leaving she returned to the sierra club. Her replacement was another hard core green, he was forced to resign shortly after obamas reelection. It was revealed that he had been handing out govt money bye the billions to green companies that made large donations to the Obama reelection campaign, the best example is solyndra who got 1 billion in govt money and then went bankrupt after cashing in. The 3rds most revealing moments come in 2 videos on the website both on Utube. Here it shows senators asking her if we do everything u ask which will cost millions of jobs put tens of millions out of work cause poverty to surge it will still only cause the worlds temperature to not go up bye .1 degree and she answered in the first one that we must do it because its symbolic. The second video is another equally useless answer. The democrats have also given NOAA [the weather dept] the national organization of atmospherica and aeronautics and some more minor depts. to the greens to run. In effect everything that now comes from the Epa or the weather depts. in the US passes through the greens control, though not all employed in those depts. are extremists and do pass info on to honest elements in the US govt.

I guess some will sure hate me from this post, but if you do go to climatedepot.com and read the articles and yes most are minor but some are huge you will begin to see what is really going on. Slowly but surely a new picture of the left wing, what its doing, how its doing it and what its goals are will become apparent. If you are looking for something exciting in your life, and a chance to truly start to understand whats going on in the world, this site will change your life.

Ive been following this site and it gives links to other sites all the time, for example you will eventually get the link to the website that posts satellite data on the poles icecaps, and omg its not at all what the left wing keeps pumping into us.

Wellll im almost paranoid to see the response I get to this!

**hazz** · 04-06-2016, 06:45 AM

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Professor Judith Curry for one.

Most of the "science" you climate scammer spout come from PhD students, and they make up the majority of your 20,000 "scientists", who are being funded by the bankers and Oiligarchy to produce research to support their need for a cap and trade exchange and the derivatives that will make trillions for them.

and reverend psudo, what exceptional hardship did she suffer? you know beyond what most noble prize winners got when they started on their heresy's?

**MrG** · 04-06-2016, 11:36 PM

Originally Posted by pulvarien

Climatedepot.com is a web site specializing in revealing how the green/extreme socialists corrupt scientific data.

Just another propoganda site funded by the usual suspects. Nothing new. Move along.

ClimateDepot.com is being financed by the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, a nonprofit in Washington that advocates for free-market solutions to environmental issues. Public tax filings for 2003-7 (the last five years for which documents are available) show that the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the ExxonMobil Foundation and foundations associated with the billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife, a longtime financier of conservative causes, including being the primary source of money used to fund attacks against Bill Clinton during the Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky eras of his presidency [1]. According to a report issued by the Union of Concerned Scientists, from 1998-2005, approximately 23% of the total ExxonMobil funding for the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow was directed by ExxonMobil for climate change activities [p. 32].

Craig Rucker, a co-founder of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, said the committee got a third of its money from other foundations. However, Rucker would not identify them or say how much his foundation would pay Marc Morano. Rucker did say that ExxonMobil did not contribute anything to the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow in 2008 [2].

Climate Depot - SourceWatch

**pseudolus** · 04-06-2016, 11:51 PM

Indeed - they are funded by Exxon. Now isn't that amusing? Funding both sides of the argument as usual.

What is more interesting perhaps is that you use SOURCEWATCH to point this out, and I dare say you completely trust them as well. After all, they are called SOURCEWATCH which in your mind means "safe" and "trustworthy". But who are they?

Hmmm well, they are a product of the "Center for Media and Democracy". They are not a centre of course, but just a few people taking money from the Eugenicist foundations. Think I am lying?

About Us | PR Watch

We publish PRWatch, SourceWatch, and BanksterUSA.....

The following foundations have provided at least one grant of $5,000 or more to support the work of the Center for Media and Democracy since its inception in 1993. Foundations in bold are current funders.

American Legacy Foundation
Bauman Family Foundation
Careth Foundation
Carolyn Foundation
Changing Horizons Charitable Trust
Courtney's Foundation
CS Fund
Deer Creek Foundation
Educational Foundation of America
Ettinger Foundation
Ford Foundation
Foundation for Deep Ecology
Foundation for Political Management
Funding Exchange
Richard and Rhoda Goldman Fund
Grodzins Fund
Helena Rubinstein Foundation
HKH Foundation
Litowitz Foundation
Marisla Foundation
Mostyn Foundation
Open Society Institute
Park Foundation
Public Welfare Foundation
Proteus Fund
V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation
Rockefeller Associates
Rockefeller Family Foundation
Rockwood Fund
Stern Family Fund
Schumann Center for Media and Democracy
Sunlight Foundation
Threshold Foundation
Tides Foundation
Town Creek Foundation
Turner Foundation
Wallace Global Fund
Winslow Foundation

And there they are in all their glory - and of course, with 100k per year, Soros is the largest funder. Who pays the piper picks the tune and all that.

So, you have a website of a "center" that is funded by Rockefeller and all the other eugenicist foundations who are behind and the beneficiaries of CLIMATE SCAM, saying that you can not trust a climate scam attacking website, because they are funded by Exxon, who in turn, regardless of if you think the Rockefellers cut ties with Exxon or not (which of course they bloody didn't), is the child of the rockefellers.

So, of course, you are going to buy the climate scam mob, and attack the exxon mob, and try to win a point of honour about a website funded by Exxon, by relying on a website funded by the Eugenicists behind Climate Scam, and the owner of Exxon (more or less)....

What a wicked web you weave.

**MrG** · 05-06-2016, 12:14 AM

Originally Posted by pseudolus

What a wicked web you weave.

The King of pseudo facts and cover-up has spoken.

**pseudolus** · 05-06-2016, 12:29 PM

Originally Posted by MrG

Originally Posted by pseudolus

What a wicked web you weave.

The King of pseudo facts and cover-up has spoken.

So Sourcewatch is not sponsored by the very people behind Climate Scam then? Is that what you are trying to indicate? Or is this just another selective acceptance of "facts" as is common from a climate scam merchant?

**bsnub** · 05-06-2016, 01:16 PM

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Indeed - they are funded by Exxon.

That is a lie. What you failed to point out when you posted that list is that there are four contributors that were highlighted in bold as current contributors. The rest are all prior contributors. None of whom have any connection to exxon or big oil at all...

Marisla Foundation

https://online.foundationsource.com/public/home/marisla

A staff of two. No connection to oil.

Park Foundation

Park Foundation | scholarships in higher education | quality media of critical issues | protection of the environment

They practice socially responsible investing. No big oil interests.

Rockefeller Family Foundation

Ahh so this is who you were talking about.... So sorry to burst your bubble but...

"The Rockefeller Family Fund said on Wednesday it would divest from fossil fuels as quickly as possible and "eliminate holdings" of Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM.N), saying the oil company associated with the family fortune has misled the public about climate change risks.

Though only a sliver of the endowment's modest $130 million in assets is invested in fossil fuels, the move is notable because a century ago John D. Rockefeller Sr. made a fortune running Standard Oil, a precursor to Exxon Mobil. The charity said it would also divest from coal and Canadian oil sands.

Given the threat posed to the survival of human and natural ecosystems, "there is no sane rationale for companies to continue to explore for new sources of hydrocarbons," the Rockefeller Family Fund said.

In a letter posted on its website, the fund said Exxon's conduct on climate issues appears to be "morally reprehensible."

Exxon said the Rockefeller fund's move was not surprising."

Rockefeller Family Fund hits Exxon, divests from fossil fuels | Reuters

Lastly...

Schumann Center for Media and Democracy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schuma..._and_Democracy

Zero Connection. Zip.

I would also like to point out that when I cut and pasted the sources of funding the active donors came out in bold on my post. So why not yours? Trying to be misleading no doubt.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

And there they are in all their glory - and of course, with 100k per year, Soros is the largest funder.

Another lie. Soros does not contribute to them AT ALL. So much for your bogus theory. Another one bites the dust.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

So Sourcewatch is not sponsored by the very people behind Climate Scam then?

Not even fcuking close.

There is no such thing.

**harrybarracuda** · 05-06-2016, 01:52 PM

He doesn't mean to tell lies. He's just an idiot.

**pseudolus** · 05-06-2016, 02:09 PM

Originally Posted by bsnub

That is a lie. What you failed to point out when you posted that list is that there are four contributors that were highlighted in bold as current contributors. The rest are all prior contributors. None of whom have any connection to exxon or big oil at all...

Well sorry for pointing out that you have wasted your time in pointing this all out, but when you sober up, you will note that I was agreeing that
ClimateDepot.com is funded by exxon as written in the sourcewatch article.

Originally Posted by bsnub

I would also like to point out that when I cut and pasted the sources of funding the active donors came out in bold on my post. So why not yours? Trying to be misleading no doubt

You use firefox? I don't. So quick to cast aspersions but yet again you are found wanting. However, well done for actually targeting the content of a post unlike your little special school buddy harrythetwat who has never done such a thing because he is a fool.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Another lie. Soros does not contribute to them AT ALL. So much for your bogus theory. Another one bites the dust.

You do not know the names of the soros foundations do you? If you did you would spot one in that list you idiot.

Fossil fuel? What's that? You still think that Oil is a fossil fuel? Oh dear. what fossils are found 7 miles under ground? Fossilized what exactly?

Love the way that you think the Rockefeller Foundation and the Rockefeller family are the nice guys now. Oh yes that David Rockefeller is a lovely guy and wants to fight Climate Change for the good of the people of the world. Do you not know anything about him and that family at all? You still think he walks around handing out dollars like the myth about his dad with nickels?

**bsnub** · 05-06-2016, 02:23 PM

Originally Posted by pseudolus

you will note that I was agreeing that ClimateDepot.com is funded by exxon as written in the sourcewatch article.

Fine but you were still wrong when you said;

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Funding both sides of the argument as usual.

Wrong!

Originally Posted by pseudolus

You do not know the names of the soros foundations do you? If you did you would spot one in that list you idiot.

Not relevant as they are not current contributors. Funny how you think Soros is some big boogie man but the Kock brothers are some insignificant drop in the bucket. Hypocrite.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Love the way that you think the Rockefeller Foundation and the Rockefeller family are the nice guys now.

I never said that. Feel free to put words in my mouth and draw conclusions all you want you are an expert at that.

Lastly...

Originally Posted by pseudolus

when you sober up

Not quite there yet still working on it mate.

**pseudolus** · 05-06-2016, 04:04 PM

Originally Posted by bsnub

Fine but you were still wrong when you said;

No I wasn't. You believe the fairly tale story that Rockefeller is not controlling world oil and gas still, and that they are not controlling exxon. You are stuck in the fake left right, red blue, white black, dialectic. It is all just as fake as the Banker v "big oil" idea. Rockefeller is Big Bank, big pharma, part owner of the private fed, big argi... you name it they are one of the families running it, and to say they are not is to fly in the face of FACTS. Climate Scam is one of their inventions.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Funny how you think Soros is some big boogie man but the Kock brothers are some insignificant drop in the bucket. Hypocrite.

Fools like you think the kock brothers are important. They are your bogeyman, and not a touch on Soros and his buddies. Soros has absolutely destroyer and impoverished whole countries, and a vast funder of NGOs who go out to create regime change opportunities for the US war economy machine. You seem to think this fucker is a nice guy FFS. Rockefeller could crush the kock useful idiots in about 3 seconds and not even break a sweat as they are insignificant. You can tell that because people outside of the US know about them now... where as in the past they did not. Bogeymen... on the same side as the climate scam mob who ALWAYS fund both sides of any divide. Always. That is indisputable whether you look at the Nazi's who were being funded by these people and US companies up until 1944 or this Climate Scam stuff.

Originally Posted by bsnub

I never said that. Feel free to put words in my mouth and draw conclusions all you want you are an expert at that.

Well you worship their climate scam, so you must like them and their work. Here, have a nickel

Originally Posted by bsnub

Not quite there yet still working on it mate.

Topping up - you will never be truly sober

**Neo** · 05-06-2016, 09:11 PM

Arctic could become ice-free for first time in more than 100,000 years, claims leading scientist | Climate Change | Environment | The Independent

**pseudolus** · 05-06-2016, 11:48 PM

^ Great article NEO. Stay tuned RIGHT TO THE END as you will like this.

Arctic could become ice-free for first time in more than 100,000 years, claims leading scientist

then

Professor Peter Wadhams of Cambridge University predicts we could see ‘an area of less than one million square kilometres for September of this year’

then

“My prediction remains that the Arctic ice may well disappear, that is, have an area of less than one million square kilometres for September of this year,” he said.

then

“Even if the ice doesn’t completely disappear, it is very likely that this will be a record low year. I’m convinced it will be less than 3.4 million square kilometres

then

“I think there’s a reasonable chance it could get down to a million this year and if it doesn’t do it this year, it will do it next year.

then

Dr Peter Gleick, a leading climatologist, said he had “no idea” if Professor Wadhams’ prediction was correct.

then

And he added: “If it's wrong, this kind of projection leads to climate sceptics and deniers to criticize the entire community.”

then

Professor Jennifer Francis, of Rutgers University in the US, who has studied the effect of the Arctic on the weather in the rest of the northern hemisphere, was also sceptical about Professor Wadhams' prediction, saying it was “highly unlikely” to come true this year.

then

She said she thought this would not happen until sometime between 2030 and 2050.

and full circle, then

“I think we are going to see perhaps a new record [in September], that’s very possible.”

Ah ha - so a load of scare mongering and no substance. However, it all looks rather familiar. I wonder why? Jump into a time machine back to 1990 when the self same Professor Wadhams stated that all sea ice would be gone by the end of that year. All of it.

Anyway, this geezer is linked to this bunch of psychopaths

Arctic Methane Emergency Group - AMEG - Arctic Sea Ice - Methane Release - Planetary Emergency

According to them, all the ice disappeared completely last year, or was supposed to be, and 1 billion people had startved to death by last year. However, when you read their reports and watch their presentations, you pick up this message loud and clear

"We must geoengineer with great urgency." (That's spraying aluminium, barium etc into the air, from planes, to block out the sun, or as they phrase it

"Both the brightening of low-level clouds and the production of a reflective haze in the stratosphere are techniques based on natural phenomena which have been studied extensively. "

which brings us to the whole chemtrail part again, that yes, that is happening, they are doing it, which account for those hazy skies that are ever present these days.

So yes, a great article Neo. I will have a look at who is funding this joker as well soon; he's been launching these scare stories into the press for 40 years now; according to him the ice has melted all over the world over 50 times by now, we are all dead, starved, skin burnt off, and not to forget in hie early years, frozen like a lollypop.

**harrybarracuda** · 06-06-2016, 11:32 AM

Originally Posted by pseudolus

which brings us to the whole chemtrail part again, that yes, that is happening, they are doing it, which account for those hazy skies that are ever present these days.

You're not only an idiot, you're a mental case, aren't you?

**ENT** · 06-06-2016, 12:39 PM

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Fossil fuel? What's that? You still think that Oil is a fossil fuel? Oh dear. what fossils are found 7 miles under ground? Fossilized what exactly?

Where do you think oil comes from, and how?

**bsnub** · 06-06-2016, 12:43 PM

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by pseudolus

which brings us to the whole chemtrail part again, that yes, that is happening, they are doing it, which account for those hazy skies that are ever present these days.

You're not only an idiot, you're a mental case, aren't you?

Yes indeed he is. A fcuking crazy bugger.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Fossil fuel? What's that? You still think that Oil is a fossil fuel? Oh dear. what fossils are found 7 miles under ground? Fossilized what exactly?

Where do you think oil comes from, and how?

This will be good..

**harrybarracuda** · 06-06-2016, 12:51 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Fossil fuel? What's that? You still think that Oil is a fossil fuel? Oh dear. what fossils are found 7 miles under ground? Fossilized what exactly?

Where do you think oil comes from, and how?

Errr.... nah fuck it.

This will be good..

Exactly. ENT has probably just gone out and got his imaginary Geology degree.

**ENT** · 06-06-2016, 12:53 PM

I take it you're clueless harry...

**harrybarracuda** · 06-06-2016, 03:17 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

I take it you're clueless harry...

Don't let me stop you ENT.

My money's on you on this one.

Thread: Any doubts about Climate Change?

Thread Tools

Display

climatedepot.com

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions