1. #3926
    In Uranus
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    30,525

    Climate Scientists Debunk Latest Bunk by Denier Roy Spencer

    Quote Originally Posted by blue
    Dr. Roy Spencer
    Dr. Spencer is on the board of directors of the George C. Marshall Institute, a right-wing conservative think tank on scientific issues and public policy. He listed as an expert for the Heartland Institute, a libertarian American public policy think tank. Dr. Spencer is also listed as an expert by the International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project (ICECAP), a global warming "skeptic" organization [DeSmogBlog]

    these article take your so called expert apart...

    https://www.theguardian.com/environm...tic-inaccurate

    https://thinkprogress.org/climate-sc...f77#.qyw6fbwn7

    Why do you clowns keep posting this crap? Debunked denialist dribble.

  2. #3927
    Thailand Expat AntRobertson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    41,562
    Quote Originally Posted by pulvarien

    On the SITE THAT CANNOT BE NAMED today

    Quote Originally Posted by pulvarien
    Climatedepot.com
    Quote Originally Posted by pulvarien
    climatedepot.com
    Quote Originally Posted by pulvarien
    climatedepot.com
    Quote Originally Posted by pulvarien
    ...
    Sorry to interrupt your attempt at a straw man / tinfoil hat making.

  3. #3928
    In Uranus
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    30,525
    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon
    Meanwhile Spencer is a CLIMATE SCIENTIST.
    No he is a meteorologist but you are to stupid to know the difference. He is also as described above a shill for big oil and libertarian. A common theme with denialists.


    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon
    The Guardian is a left wing rag full of crap.
    You got some credible proof to back that up? The article is written by a respected climate scientist who sites numerous sources (specifically this paper) and fellow scientists show that the paper by ‘sceptics’ Spencer & Braswell is rife with unrealistic assumptions in an overly simple model. You can not discredit it and I challenge you to do so.

    From the thinkprogress article more credible experts chime in on Dr. Spencers flawed models;

    As the famous critique goes, “Your manuscript is both good and original. But the part that is good is not original, and the part that is original is not good”:
    1. “He’s taken an incorrect model, he’s tweaked it to match observations, but the conclusions you get from that are not correct,” Andrew Dessler, a professor of atmospheric sciences at Texas A&M University.
    2. “It is not newsworthy,” Daniel Murphy, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) cloud researcher, wrote in an email to LiveScience.
    3. NCAR’s Kevin Trenberth in an email: “I have read the paper. I can not believe it got published. Maybe it got through because it is not in a journal that deals with atmospheric science much?”
    4. Trenberth and John Fasullo at RealClimate: “The bottom line is that there is NO merit whatsoever in this paper.”
    So how many scientists have to speak out against your denialist?
    Last edited by bsnub; 29-08-2016 at 08:19 AM.

  4. #3929
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last Online
    01-05-2022 @ 06:28 AM
    Location
    NAKON SAWAN
    Posts
    5,674
    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon View Post
    The Guardian is a left wing rag full of crap. Meanwhile Spencer is a CLIMATE SCIENTIST.

    Poor bum boy bsnub
    Snubbles is famous for ragging on every piece of literature that challenges mans part in climate change, not real global scientist, no pier review,ect.,ect. but is first to bless a leftist rag when they try to debunk a scientist of the other flavor. Very little respect for this key board warrior who has never showed his credentials as a climate scientist, how is he to be taken seriously is well beyond me.

    I could probably qoute his responcetothis post verbatim,if there is one.

  5. #3930
    In Uranus
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    30,525
    Quote Originally Posted by RPETER65
    pier review
    Its peer review you moron and if you cant even spell it you sure dont have a damn clue how the process works. Dr. Spencers works did not hold muster in the peer review process you idiot. Those are scientists in the post I made above who are trashing his models and data as flawed. That is how the peer review process works.



    Quote Originally Posted by RPETER65
    first to bless a leftist rag when they try to debunk a scientist of the other flavor.
    The article is written by a scientist who is quoting other scientists who say Dr. Spencer is wrong it doesn't matter that it was posted by the guardian it is the source material and the scientists that do.

    On one side you have a "scientist" who is on the take of big oil and happens to be a libertarian on the other side you have at least ten scientists just in the post I made above saying he is wrong. Once again that is the peer review process exposing bad science.
    Last edited by bsnub; 29-08-2016 at 09:47 AM.

  6. #3931
    Thailand Expat AntRobertson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    41,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon
    Bsnub boy hasn't a clue he's been fooled.
    Says the guy that cut 'n pastes stuff that disproves the point he thinks he's making and doesn't even understand the most basic principles of science.

  7. #3932
    In Uranus
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    30,525
    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon
    On one side you have scientists investigating science On the other alarmist nuts on the gravy train
    You are a moron.

    One discredited denalist against a multitude of credible climate scientists.

    The only one on any gravy train is Dr. Spencer who takes money from big oil like most denialists.

  8. #3933
    In Uranus
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    30,525
    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon
    Wrong bozo. 2 degrees warmer oceans 9000 yeaers ago
    You have a short memory. You where just utterly humiliated with regards to this comment just one page back and left with your tail between your legs.


    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon
    Quoting lefty blogs and warmist nutters on the gravy train.
    Prove anything I posted wrong with evidence and facts to back up your allegations. Everything you have posted has been countered and proven false with data and evidence. Sadly you cant do the same because there is no credible data to support your tinfoil theories.

    You have been clowned.

  9. #3934
    Thailand Expat AntRobertson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    41,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon
    Quote Originally Posted by AntRobertson
    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon
    Bsnub boy hasn't a clue he's been fooled.
    Says the guy that cut 'n pastes stuff that disproves the point he thinks he's making and doesn't even understand the most basic principles of science.
    Wrong bozo. 2 degrees warmer oceans 9000 yeaers ago

    Poor little pissant can't count to 2
    Q.E.D.

    Cuts 'n pastes a Googled research paper to disprove anthropogenic global warming... That proves anthropogenic global warming.

    That takes a very special kind of dumb. Special.

  10. #3935
    Thailand Expat MrG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    2,955
    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bsnub View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon
    On one side you have scientists investigating science On the other alarmist nuts on the gravy train
    You are a moron.

    One discredited denalist against a multitude of credible climate scientists.

    The only one on any gravy train is Dr. Spencer who takes money from big oil like most denialists.
    You are a little poof. Quoting lefty blogs and warmist nutters on the gravy train.
    This Moon Bat is Booners or maybe Jet. Could be somebody else, but there is a definite familiar similarity in the verbage. They are wing-nuts all.
    The three great strategies for obscuring an issue are to introduce irrelevancies, to arouse prejudice, and to excite ridicule....---Bergen Evans, The Natural History of Nonsense.

  11. #3936
    Thailand Expat AntRobertson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    41,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon
    Special kind of dumb is ignoring the last 10000 years.
    So not only did you cut 'n paste something that disproved the very point you were thought you were making you didn't even read it or, if you did, you completely and utterly failed to understand it.

    Special.

  12. #3937
    In Uranus
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    30,525
    ^ You are a shitty troll you know that.

    I am starting to feel bad for slapping around the intellectually challenged.

  13. #3938
    In Uranus
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    30,525
    Quote Originally Posted by MrG
    This Moon Bat is Booners or maybe Jet.
    definitly not booners because this one can barely cut and paste. Boon was an expert at doing that. With regards to Jet boon said she had cancer and has been gone from the board for sometime. But you got me thinking. This one has...

    Quote Originally Posted by MrG
    but there is a definite familiar similarity in the verbage.
    It could well be jet she had this type of posting style. Poor format and grammar.

  14. #3939
    Thailand Expat AntRobertson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    41,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon
    Wrong again. 2 degrees warmer in the past

    What an idiot.
    ...
    Quote Originally Posted by AntRobertson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon
    Shows warmer in the past
    You don't even understand what you've posted. You just Googled something that you thought supported your position and cut 'n pasted it with zero comprehension.

    Re: the study you linked to:

    Oceans heating up faster now than in the past 10,000 years, says new study

    Posted on 5 November 2013 by John Abraham

    If the latest research is correct, our oceans are heating up much faster now than they have in the past 10,000 years. This is one of the conclusions that is drawn from a recently published paper in Science. The researchers (Yair Rosenthal, Braddock Linsley, and Delia Oppo) cleverly traveled back in time to explore how ocean temperatures have changed. Comparison of those temperatures to today's helped them quantify the impact that human greenhouse gas emissions are having on the planet.

    [...]

    Here is what the author himself had to say:

    "It is clear that much of the heat that humans have put into the atmosphere through greenhouse gas emissions will be absorbed by the ocean. But the absorption time takes hundreds of years, much longer than the current rate of warming and the planet will keep warming. Our study puts the modern observations into a long-term context. Our reconstruction of Pacific Ocean temperatures suggests that in the last 10,000 years, the Pacific mid-depths have generally been cooling by about 2 degrees centigrade until a minimum about 300 years during the period known as the Little Ice Age.

    After that, mid-depth temperatures started warming but at a very slow rate. Then, since about 1950, temperatures from just below the sea surface to ~1000 meter, increased by 0.18 degrees C. This seemingly small increase occurred an order of magnitude faster than suggested by the gradual change during the last 10,000 years thereby providing another indication for global warming. But our results also show the temperature of the ocean interior is still much colder than at any time in the past 10,000 years thus, lagging the changes we see at the ocean surface."
    Oceans heating up faster now than in the past 10,000 years, says new study

    You utter mungbean!

  15. #3940
    Thailand Expat AntRobertson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    41,562


    That's what happens when you're not even bright enough to pull off cherry-picking a scientific study.

  16. #3941
    In Uranus
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    30,525
    Jet=Minnie=Horatio Hornblower=Somboon

    Got it!

  17. #3942
    Thailand Expat AntRobertson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    41,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon
    So we have

    1 350 year trend going up
    2 IPCC wrong 96% of the time
    3 Oceans est warmer by 2 degrees some 9000 years ago
    4. Science: Somboon doesn't understand it

  18. #3943
    In Uranus
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    30,525
    somboon really means somegoon.

  19. #3944
    In Uranus
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    30,525
    Quote Originally Posted by Somboon
    Wrong again.
    I am not wrong jet your posting style is a dead give away...

    https://teakdoor.com/search.php?searchid=13051411

    https://teakdoor.com/search.php?searchid=13051419

    https://teakdoor.com/search.php?searchid=13051424

    That is the posting history of Jet Gorgon, Minnie Maugham and you current nic. The similarity is stunning.

  20. #3945
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,844
    Doesn't matter, he'd be a wanker whatever nick he uses.


  21. #3946
    In Uranus
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    30,525
    ^ She

  22. #3947
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last Online
    01-05-2022 @ 06:28 AM
    Location
    NAKON SAWAN
    Posts
    5,674
    Quote Originally Posted by bsnub View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by RPETER65
    pier review
    Its peer review you moron and if you cant even spell it you sure dont have a damn clue how the process works. Dr. Spencers works did not hold muster in the peer review process you idiot. Those are scientists in the post I made above who are trashing his models and data as flawed. That is how the peer review process works.



    Quote Originally Posted by RPETER65
    first to bless a leftist rag when they try to debunk a scientist of the other flavor.
    The article is written by a scientist who is quoting other scientists who say Dr. Spencer is wrong it doesn't matter that it was posted by the guardian it is the source material and the scientists that do.

    On one side you have a "scientist" who is on the take of big oil and happens to be a libertarian on the other side you have at least ten scientists just in the post I made above saying he is wrong. Once again that is the peer review process exposing bad science.

    Went right over your head.

  23. #3948
    Member

    Join Date
    May 2016
    Last Online
    09-04-2017 @ 02:40 AM
    Posts
    288
    C02 has now risen to even greater crisis levels then the leftist warmist thugs have stated!!!! It has now reached OMG 1 part in 10,000 of the atmosphere!!! Proof positive that the left do not have their heads up their....... All to be found on the site that cannot be mentioned posted on the right under 411.

  24. #3949
    Thailand Expat MrG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    2,955
    ^
    Why can't it be mentioned...?
    Because it's only published in a tin hat.

  25. #3950
    Thailand Expat AntRobertson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    41,562
    Quote Originally Posted by MrG
    Why can't it be mentioned...?
    Because it feeds into his delusional conspiracy theories to prattle on that the site that he has mentioned at least 30 times can't be mentioned.

    He's not very bright you know.

Page 158 of 272 FirstFirst ... 58108148150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166168208258 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •