You forgot "Fox News Alert! Some fake scandal we invented last century that we're still banging on about!".Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Strategy
Printable View
You forgot "Fox News Alert! Some fake scandal we invented last century that we're still banging on about!".Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Strategy
No.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaYou forgot "Fox News Alert! Some fake scandal we invented last century that we're still banging on about!".Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Strategy
Neglected to mention MSNBC's continued fabrcations and distortions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drOHGyMX6X4
It might have some credence if they played the rest of the MSNBC piece where they likely discussed this. The question by the in-studio host--the answer to which we are not permitted to see--looks like a tee-up to discuss that very fact. My question is who is doing the actual distorting here?Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Keep trying Booney. Anyone who digs is sh*t as much as you do should be able to come up with an actual turd.
MEDIA: NEVER MIND HILLARY’S SCANDALS, LET’S TALK ABOUT MARCO RUBIO’S WIFE’S DRIVING HABITS
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2015/06/291.jpg
Remember how the media left Barack Obama completely unvetted, ignoring even the most damaging stories from his past, while a squirming mass of reporters fought over every scrap of trash in the dumpster behind Sarah Palin’s house? It’s happening again.
For some reason, the New York Times decided to devote two reporters to the urgent task of reviewing Senator and presidential candidate Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)81%
’s driving record over the past 18 years. And they still couldn’t make much of a story about it, so they decided to add his wife’s record to the story.
Voila! “Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)81%
and His Wife Cited 17 Times for Traffic Infractions,” screams the headline. For some reason, the headline fails to mention that they had to dig back to 1997 to come up with that total. I’m sure it’s just a bit of editorial oversight that “… Over the Past 18 Years” was chopped off the headline.
What festers beneath the headline reads like a satire of a biased-media hit piece. Remember, as the following prose was tumbling off the word processor, the front-running Democrat candidate for 2016 is dealing with an endless string of payola scandals tied to phony charity and shell corporations, not to mention deleting a mountain of subpoenaed emails she was keeping on an illegal black-box server:
Senator Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)81%
has been in a hurry to get to the top, rising from state legislator to United States senator in the span of a decade and now running for president at age 44.
But politics is not the only area where Mr. Rubio, a Republican from Florida, has an affinity for the fast track. He and his wife, Jeanette, have also shown a tendency to be in a rush on the road.
According to a search of the Miami-Dade and Duval County court dockets, the Rubios have been cited for numerous infractions over the years for incidents that included speeding, driving through red lights and careless driving. A review of records dating back to 1997 shows that the couple had a combined 17 citations: Mr. Rubio with four and his wife with 13. On four separate occasions they agreed to attend remedial driving school after a violation.
Mr. Rubio’s troubles behind the wheel predate his days in politics. In 1997, when he was cited for careless driving by a Florida Highway Patrol officer, he was fined and took voluntary driving classes. A dozen years later, in 2009, he was ticketed for speeding on a highway in Duval County and found himself back in driver improvement school.
Things got more complicated in 2011 when Mr. Rubio was alerted to the fact that his license was facing suspension after a traffic camera caught him failing to stop at a red light in his beige Buick. His lawyer, Alex Hanna, paid a $16 fee to delay the suspension and eventually it was dismissed.
On and on it goes. It’s as long as anything you’ll ever read from the mainstream media about, say, the White House Travel Office, Whitewater, or the sale of America’s uranium to Russia for Clinton cash.
Meanwhile, Hillary “Dead Broke” Clinton was being chauffered between luxury private jets and her two estates, perhaps occasionally glancing up from reading the latest “personal” email from her favorite donors, on the iPad she would later claim she wasn’t carrying, to watch the Little People buzz around in their cars and chuckle over how much time they waste behind the wheel.
I thought the media was adamant that the wives and children of politicians were strictly off-limits. But when their big “expose” on Marco Rubio could only find four traffic citations since 1997, they didn’t hesitate to drag his wife into the story. “War on Women,” anyone?
Is this going to be the first in a series? Will all of the chauffeurs for Madame Clinton and the prospective First Dude now be subjected to similar scrutiny? (State Department employees, as a class, have been known to build up some colorful driving records.) What about Bernie Sanders and the other Democrat hopefuls? If Lincoln Chafee got a speeding ticket, will it be reported in miles per hour, or kilometers per hour?
How about the Obamas? Actually, we already know how relevant the media considered their driving records…"
Media: Never Mind Hillary's Scandals, Let's Talk About Marco Rubio's Wife's Driving Habits - Breitbart
No shit...:chitown:
Don't worry Booners, much like the fake scandals, this will be forgotten in no time.
:)
^^Booners would love it if only the foibles of Democrats were scrutinized by the press. Quit whining, you are the among the worst for posting shit that comes from sifting through the trash.
‘New York Times’ shows its ‘gotcha’ colors:
Rubio’s four traffic tickets aren’t news, unless you’re publishing political hit-pieces.
So Friday's New York Times contained an enormous scoop — one so important that it was bylined by two reporters, Alan Rappeport and Steve Eder, and a researcher, Kitty Bennett. The scoop? That Marco Rubio had some traffic tickets. Well, actually, only four in 18 years. But the story combined Rubio's driving record with that of his wife so that it could maintain that the couple "had a combined 17 citations."
In other words, Rubio had four, and his wife had 13. Worse yet, we're told, the Rubios had to attend driving school on four occasions."
Glenn Reynolds: 'New York Times' shows its 'gotcha' colors
Forget about ISIS and the miserable state of affairs surrounding the failed community agitator. Forget about the HRC & Bubba Scandals. Naw, we're gonna do some investigating on Rubios's traffic tickets! :rofl:
Opinion or fact?Quote:
Originally Posted by MrG
No-one is going to worry about this shit though Booners. They'll be too interested asking him why he paid for family holidays and nights out with campaign money back in the day, and why he made someone else take the fall for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
That's if he gets that far.
:chitown:
So, if you go to the NY Times Science page, it's all about the Pope?
Science - The New York Times
You know, they told me if I voted Republican, America would wind up taking scientific dictation from religious leaders. And they were right! :chitown:
What?Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
It's a religious leader who is actually listening to scientists Booners.
That's a breakthrough any day of the week.
The old creationist wankers will be up in arms when he says he believes in the Big Bang theory.
:)
Just one of God's firecrackers. He fires one off about every 30 billion years or so.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
Desperately looking for a way to avoid pegging the Chattanooga murderer Mohammad Youssuf Abdulazeez as anything but a terrorist, MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell asked a childhood friend of the killer what he liked to do in “small town Tennessee”:
“Were guns a big part of activities—social or other activities?” Mitchell asked her interviewee abruptly.
“What?” her interviewee responded.
“Did he hunt, did he shoot?” Mitchell prodded. “Was that just part of small-town Tennessee activity?”
“Um, he actually wasn’t one of the guys I heard about going hunting,” Abdulazeez’s classmate responded. “He wasn’t really that kind of guy.”
Mitchell Fishes for Better Angle on Chattanooga Terrorist | Washington Free Beacon
Just can't accept that it was an act of War. Shooting civilians is an act of Terror. Shooting up Military folks is an act of War. :yup:
Big whoosh over the head there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
She was trying to find out if he was a "gun nut," not anything else you have imagined this means.
Irrelevant to BM, he just wants to sensationalise the deaths to make his pathetic 'points' seem acceptable.Quote:
Originally Posted by misskit
No whoosh Misskit - Mitchell was fishing for something:Quote:
Originally Posted by misskit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FpSTW4BQRM
Yes - whoosh, BM. Obvious to all bar a few like you, who want to sensationalise murder - when will you emulate your new best friend and like-minded bigot piwanoi and add laughing smilies while discussing deaths?Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8SSY0Vh_gw
Here's your chance to rant on about 'overlords' and the 'statist media' again
^
Why didn't Choomboy call the slaughter of those unarmed Marines & sailor what it really was?
Islamoterrorism my man. Try spinning all you want, that boy was driven to shoot due to his warped so-called 'religion'.
^Funny, when it was 9 blacks killed by a gunman in a church your overlords told you to push the line that it was violence against Christians instead of right wing racist terrorism.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Different . . . one guy killed white people and the other, a white guy, killed blacks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
BM is a bigot from way back, why would he equate nine dead black people with four dead whites . . . especially if the white killer was . . . well, white
For all you doubters, read this:
NY Times Omits Evidence Planned Parenthood Violated Law
btw, in answer to bstubs earlier post re 'who cares? It's just dead babies and dead old men' - is that what we're dealing with here? Soylent Green?
^As I said earlier mush to the gaffaws and ridecule of the progressives *.Quote:
The Times editorial board also fails to look at compelling evidence (in both videos) that Planned Parenthood was altering how procedures were performed in order to produce useable organs. That’s a violation of the consent forms patients were asked to sign. There was also some discussion of ways to skirt the partial birth abortion ban, which deserves further investigation.
Incredibly, the NY Times managed to miss all of this this when writing its blithe and misleading editorial. At least, that’s the most positive spin one can put on this piece. It’s also possible the Times knew exactly what was in the videos but decided not to confuse readers with the facts. The Times has never been accused of playing it straight on the issue of abortion.
* progressive - AKA sociopath
Spending to much time over on infowars I suspect. Your tinfoiled stupidity has pushed you right into the hands of the corporapists. Simple fool.Quote:
Originally Posted by pseudolus
JOURNALISM SUCK-UP WATCH:
“Polished, practiced and private, Chelsea Clinton is the closest thing America has to a princess.” :rofl:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...c09_story.html
Prime example of left-wing moonbat crazy bias in the news here, boys:
VICTORY: NEWSWEEK SO DEAD IT IS TROLLING THE POW/MIA FLAG AS RACIST
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2015/08/655.jpg
How doornail dead is the left-wing Newsweek? How over, how buried, how room temperature, how worm-food, liquidated, snuffed out, toes up, terminated, bucket-kicked is Newsweek? So dead all the owners and publishers have to grab attention is to troll nothing less than the POW/MIA flag. And as racist, no less.
Some trolling goes so far — so beyond despicable and desperate, you’re committing a moral crime by rewarding it with a link; so we are not going to do that here. What matters isn’t the left-wing lunacy that would float such an idea, what matters is the subtext — what Newsweek’s attack on an iconic symbol designed specifically to honor those who must never be forgotten really means.
What it means is that at long last Newsweek is over. It means that whoever bought the left-wing propaganda rag for $1 got hoodwinked.
At long last, Newsweek is finally out of our misery.
And the fact that Newsweek doesn’t know it is dead yet, only makes the victory all the sweeter.
P.S. For those wondering, the Newsweek columnist considers the POW/MIA flag racist because of Nixon, or something. The column is about 1600 words long and never really explains its own premise.
Doornail dead, America."
Victory: Newsweek So Dead It Is Trolling the POW/MIA Flag as Racist - Breitbart
Does anybody even read Newsweek anymore?