Same same, huh?Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Do they also travel back home in coffin class?
Same same, huh?Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Do they also travel back home in coffin class?
They're stationed there at the request of the host governments --who know a good thing when they see one.
Imagine that. A few countries in the world that aren't insignificant, morally vacant, washed-up, has-beens actually WANT US troops in their countries.
How many US troops are stationed in England? Bout 10,000 I reckon ... I might be wrong, but I doubt it.
Well, then it's not same same, right?Originally Posted by Texpat
![]()

Nice to know the war is over. Someone please tell the soldiers.
Sometimes I think these blokes actually believe their own bullshit.
The Tex melt-down continues...Originally Posted by Texpat
![]()
Hmm.Originally Posted by Boon Mee
For reasons unknown, the old obsolete Issues rules are still there as a sticky:
" We do not tolerate direct personal insults and foul language directed at members."
" We do not tolerate outright racist remarks nor religious or gender related slurs."
Last edited by Norton; 29-05-2008 at 02:39 PM.
^^ more of a warm up
^ Could you be any more hypocritical?
dateline nakhon nowhere......Originally Posted by Panda
the war in iraq is over....in fact, it ended in 2003.
Good to see you're finally coming around Corporal Carey.
What exists there is a complete mess. But it's not a war. You might buy into the term war on terror, but that's more of a concept or ideal. Not a war in the traditional sense. Do you consider fighting your TD deamons a war, Jason?
Don't denigrate the term war by comparing it with battles or skirmishes.
"Justice without force is a myth." -- Blaise Pascal
Well, that's another mod outed.Originally Posted by stroller
![]()

Obviously a slow news day in Iraq then.

Only a few dozen Iraqis dead including women and kids. But then again those dirty rag heads dont count. No Americans killed today. So its all good news.
So sad to see the Americans turn this country into a slaughterhouse of anarchy.
Liberation from a ruthless dictator has led only to vastly increased suffering for the people of Iraq. GWB has the blood of far more Iraqis on his hands than Saddam Hussein ever did. The bastard should be publicly hanged and go down in history along side Hitler and other war criminals for the crimes against humanity he has committed.
A wee bit over the top there, perhaps?Originally Posted by Panda
![]()
I think there are some countries - or the special interests within certain countries that want the US in these countries.
But in general it would be better for the US to focus on illegal immigration, reduce the wasteful cost of foreign placements overseas, and stop using the US presence in the theme lf "democracy" which is does not want. The US is overseas in countries of which it has an economic interest.
It's Machiavelian.
Nothing more; nothing less.
............
Sure.Originally Posted by Milkman
And those who don't are "insignificant, morally vacant, washed-up, has-beens". I think I will need to spend some time doing research to establish if this well considered allegation is true in all, or at least the overwhelming majority of cases.![]()
It's going well. I even watched a report on BBC tonight that showed an Iraqi saying very positive things about his government and the situation on the ground.
Get your digs in now boys. Too bad you had to leave so soon (hehehe). Don't be angry at American successes. Just suck it up and try harder.![]()
Too late to meaningfully argue that the invasion and occupation of Iraq was a success, but the sooner an element of stability can be reintroduced to the place the better. If it can't, well I think to say it's an embarassment for the US would be an understatement. Lets hope no civil war eventuates.
I believe however that it can- not perfectly, but at least to the extent where the US military occupation can scale down, and meaningful foreign investment can commence.
If the security situation becomes tenable, it is foreign investment that will provide the stimulus to bring Iraqi living standards and quality of life back to what they were, and surpass them in the long term. Mutual benefit you might say- a buck in it for 'us' a buck in it for them.
It was a tragic folly, but we have to deal with what is rather than what should have been. Little purpose would be served by a unilateral withdrawal at this point.
Tragic folly?
The US Revolutionary War lasted far longer than 5 years and the US took another few decades to get it's shit together.
In 20 years Iraq will look back on this period fondly and continue to thank the United States of America.
In 100 years when Iraq is a superpower, those whose grandfathers chickened out will still be making digs, pissing and moaning and berating actions which they didn't have the intestinal fortitude to partake.
Yeah, I am sure they will come to their senses and appreciate having been a strategic target for US power-brokers and oil barons.Originally Posted by Texpat
They might have cleared all the remaining active cluster bomb bits in 20 years as well.
Yes, tragic folly. But by all means continue to argue from your dwindling corner, you are an endangered species these days.Originally Posted by Texpat
Hardly- have you ever visited Vietnam? Actually, most Iraqi's look back fondly on their quality of life 20 years ago- y'know, best standard of living in the Arab world and all that. In twenty years time however, Iraq will hopefully be a functioning nation- or what was Iraq will be three smaller nations if it doesn't go as we hope. Those many who were killed will be long dead, those who will be forever bitter will be aging and dying, and a younger generation ascendant.Originally Posted by Texpat
Like I said-
Originally Posted by sabang
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)