Thread: Iraq News

it's getting plenty of press....i've seen articles in the NYT, washington post, and MSNBC.

and if in fact the iranian govt. is involved, who could blame them? the US invaded two of their neighbors.

if iran invaded canada and mexico, do you think the US wouldn't be doing exactly the same thing?

btw earl.....if you're so anxious for war, why haven't you applied for any of the KBR jobs in iraq?

granted you'd have to leave the 'paradise' that is patong beach.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Yes, it's called 'realpolitik'.

no, it's called stupid...

A U.S. helicopter was forced down south of Baghdad on Friday, and two soldiers were injured, the military said.
The incident occurred in the predominantly Sunni town of Youssifiyah, 10 miles south of the capital.

U.S. helicopter forced down near Baghdad - Yahoo! News

and earl posted that the missing 190,000 missing weapons wasn't a big deal because of their cost......i wonder if one of those 190,000 weapons shot down this helicopter.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Yes, it's called 'realpolitik'.

so was arming Saddam and Bin Laden

exactly....some fools never learn.

^
^^

Hey I already said that!

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Yes, it's called 'realpolitik'.

so was arming Saddam and Bin Laden

When I was visiting the U.S. I noticed unsurprisingly, who ignorant the Yanks are.

They didn't realize and never knew that the U.S. was in bed with Saddam and Bing Laden.

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Yes, it's called 'realpolitik'.

so was arming Saddam and Bin Laden

You guys just don't get it!
The enemy of my enemy is my friend!

[quote=Boon Mee;364725]

Originally Posted by Butterfly

The enemy of my enemy is my friend!

No Booner, he's not.

^
Well, as the saying goes...it ain't over 'till the rotund female sings, eh?

Well, you guys pretty much lost Iraq already, not sure what else you are waiting for ? probably the chimp to go and have someone with balls in charge.

The Chimp is burnt out and probably looking for a way to quit.

Well, read this .

The coalition of the Willing will be in Iraq for a long time boys...

Dear Oil in Iraq,

We are happy to let you know that you will belong to new boss, he's American and fighting in every way in order to get you. We hope that you will be happy with this good news and Looking forward to see you in new look:-)

Best regard

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

coalition of the Willing

can anyone provide boner with a link to which countries are still in the 'coalition' and how many of their military personnel are actually in iraq?

off the top of my head, i remember that the UK has approx. 5,000....and they're the second biggest contributor after the US at 150,000 +.

they don't seem too 'willing' anymore....if they ever did.

^
OZ has a number of 'patriotic' boys there as well as Poland I believe...

I think we have more in 'Ghan now booner.

^
Well, good on ya!

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

OZ has a number of 'patriotic' boys there as well as Poland I believe..

but less than the 5,000 the brits have.

the 'coalition' is a fraud...and only fools still believe it still exists....if it ever did.

^
Read the link in post #213 and get back to us will you?
That's a nice boy...

you dope....neither poland or austalia is mentioned in the article.

and did you even read the article beyond the headline? it doesn't support your "" position about US troops being in iraq 'until the job is done'.

Originally Posted by raycarey

you dope....neither poland or austalia is mentioned in the article.

I weren't referring to 'austalia' [sic] re the article.
Too much lao kao tonight there teacher?

boonie posts deliberately misleading info and claims it's 'part of the public record', and when called on it, he offers up 'get used to it"

he cites articles that don't have anything to do with his posts....and i'm highly skeptical that he's even read the aticles.

he more often than not cites bloggers.

i'm beginning to remember why i stopped posting in issues.

Originally Posted by raycarey

boonie posts deliberately misleading info and claims it's 'part of the public record', and when called on it, he offers up 'get used to it"
he cites articles that don't have anything to do with his posts....and i'm highly skeptical that he's even read the aticles.
i'm beginning to remember why i stopped posting in issues.

Well, ray, the first thing to go is the memory, right?
The aticles [sic] I cite support the uncomfortable fact that 'we' will be in Iraq for a few more years whether or not that meets with your personal approval. Nothing misleading there, eh?