Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    ding ding ding
    Spin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,606

    Goldman Sachs Sued by SEC for Fraud on Mortgage-Backed CDOs

    This is massive....

    April 16 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc. was sued by U.S. regulators for fraud tied to packaging and selling collateralized debt obligations that contributed to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.
    Goldman Sachs misstated and omitted key facts about a financial product tied to subprime mortgages as the U.S. housing market was beginning to falter, the Securities and Exchange Commission said in a statement today. The SEC also sued Fabrice Tourre, a Goldman Sachs vice president.
    The SEC alleged that Goldman Sachs, led by Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein, structured and marketed CDOs that hinged on the performance of subprime mortgage-backed securities. The New York-based firm failed to disclose to investors that hedge fund Paulson & Co. was betting against the security and influenced the selection of securities for the portfolio, the SEC said. Paulson wasn’t accused of wrongdoing.
    “The product was new and complex but the deception and conflicts are old and simple,” SEC Enforcement Director Robert Khuzami said in a statement. “Goldman wrongly permitted a client that was betting against the mortgage market to heavily influence which mortgage securities to include in an investment portfolio, while telling other investors that the securities were selected by an independent, objective third party.”
    Shares of Goldman Sachs fell 11 percent to $163.91 as of 11 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange trading.
    Goldman Sachs spokesman Lucas Van Praag didn’t return a call and an e-mail seeking comment. A call to Richard Klapper, an attorney for Goldman Sachs at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, wasn’t returned. Tourre, reached by phone in London today, declined to comment. A call to Pamela Chepiga, a lawyer for Tourre at Allen & Overy LLP, wasn’t returned.



    source


    More from Zerohedge


    Washington, D.C., April 16, 2010 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Goldman, Sachs & Co. and one of its vice presidents for defrauding investors by misstating and omitting key facts about a financial product tied to subprime mortgages as the U.S. housing market was beginning to falter.
    The SEC alleges that Goldman Sachs structured and marketed a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) that hinged on the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). Goldman Sachs failed to disclose to investors vital information about the CDO, in particular the role that a major hedge fund played in the portfolio selection process and the fact that the hedge fund had taken a short position against the CDO.

    "The product was new and complex but the deception and conflicts are old and simple," said Robert Khuzami, Director of the Division of Enforcement. "Goldman wrongly permitted a client that was betting against the mortgage market to heavily influence which mortgage securities to include in an investment portfolio, while telling other investors that the securities were selected by an independent, objective third party."

    Kenneth Lench, Chief of the SEC's Structured and New Products Unit, added, "The SEC continues to investigate the practices of investment banks and others involved in the securitization of complex financial products tied to the U.S. housing market as it was beginning to show signs of distress."

    The SEC alleges that one of the world's largest hedge funds, Paulson & Co., paid Goldman Sachs to structure a transaction in which Paulson & Co. could take short positions against mortgage securities chosen by Paulson & Co. based on a belief that the securities would experience credit events.

    According to the SEC's complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the marketing materials for the CDO known as ABACUS 2007-AC1 (ABACUS) all represented that the RMBS portfolio underlying the CDO was selected by ACA Management LLC (ACA), a third party with expertise in analyzing credit risk in RMBS. The SEC alleges that undisclosed in the marketing materials and unbeknownst to investors, the Paulson & Co. hedge fund, which was poised to benefit if the RMBS defaulted, played a significant role in selecting which RMBS should make up the portfolio.

    The SEC's complaint alleges that after participating in the portfolio selection, Paulson & Co. effectively shorted the RMBS portfolio it helped select by entering into credit default swaps (CDS) with Goldman Sachs to buy protection on specific layers of the ABACUS capital structure. Given that financial short interest, Paulson & Co. had an economic incentive to select RMBS that it expected to experience credit events in the near future. Goldman Sachs did not disclose Paulson & Co.'s short position or its role in the collateral selection process in the term sheet, flip book, offering memorandum, or other marketing materials provided to investors.

    The SEC alleges that Goldman Sachs Vice President Fabrice Tourre was principally responsible for ABACUS 2007-AC1. Tourre structured the transaction, prepared the marketing materials, and communicated directly with investors. Tourre allegedly knew of Paulson & Co.'s undisclosed short interest and role in the collateral selection process. In addition, he misled ACA into believing that Paulson & Co. invested approximately $200 million in the equity of ABACUS, indicating that Paulson & Co.'s interests in the collateral selection process were closely aligned with ACA's interests. In reality, however, their interests were sharply conflicting.

    According to the SEC's complaint, the deal closed on April 26, 2007, and Paulson & Co. paid Goldman Sachs approximately $15 million for structuring and marketing ABACUS. By Oct. 24, 2007, 83 percent of the RMBS in the ABACUS portfolio had been downgraded and 17 percent were on negative watch. By Jan. 29, 2008, 99 percent of the portfolio had been downgraded.

    Investors in the liabilities of ABACUS are alleged to have lost more than $1 billion.

    The SEC's complaint charges Goldman Sachs and Tourre with violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5. The Commission seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement of profits, prejudgment interest, and financial penalties.

    source
    Originally Posted by Smeg
    ... I like to fantasise sometimes, and I lie very occasionally... my superior home, job, wealth, freedom, car, girl, retirement age, appearance, satisfaction with birth country etc etc... Over the past few years I have put together over 100 pages on notes on thaiophilia...

  2. #2
    Banned Muadib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    4,774
    Yep, on all the financial sites now... Fookin' taking the market down with them...

    What concerns me is that this is a civil lawsuit and should be criminal charges...

  3. #3
    ding ding ding
    Spin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,606
    Quote Originally Posted by Muadib
    civil lawsuit and should be criminal charges
    One should lead to another but this action opens the floodgates for all kinds of lawsuits from all over the place.

    This is going to get interesting!

  4. #4
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    I hope this is a story with teeth.

    And as Maudib states, what about the criminal charges?

  5. #5
    In transit to Valhalla

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    5,036
    Quote Originally Posted by Milkman View Post
    I hope this is a story with teeth.

    And as Maudib states, what about the criminal charges?
    Must surely follow if the Lawsuit has any merit

  6. #6
    Banned Muadib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    4,774
    The announcement is the result of a 2 year investigation by the SEC into fraud on behave of Goldman Sachs and Paulson & Co where Paulson & Co gave positive ratings on CDO's which they were shorting themselves...

    The date & time of the release is now known to be political in nature as it came hours before Barry Obama addressed a committee on financial institutional reform... Obama is trying to fast-track this legislation through Congress before the end of April and this announcement was timed as a ploy to arm-twist republicans into voting for the bill... Obama is grand-standing to ramrod this legislation through to the detriment of the overall financial markets... Billions in liquidity have just been sucked out of the markets on this 148+ point downturn as the memory of 2008 is still fresh in everyone's memory...
    Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a minute, but set him on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

  7. #7
    Banned Muadib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    4,774
    Just in, Goldman has leaked information that they were actually invested long in the CDO's in question and were not shorting them, which is the contention of the SEC... This is a game-changer if proved correct...

    The SEC cannot bring criminal charges on this matter as they do not have the authority to do so... If criminal charges are to be brought it will have to be done by the justice department...

    The whole thing smells of political posturing and frankly, it stinks...

  8. #8
    Thailand Expat
    billy the kid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    19-11-2016 @ 07:57 PM
    Posts
    7,636
    Immm, no surprises there then . Getting some of that money back into the system would be something. Can they stop it happening in the future ? Is that the challenge ?

  9. #9
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    According to this vid, Goldman Sachs is the first of more banks to be charged.

    Hard to know what's accurate and not accurate on these "financial" shows, however.

    As noted above, it's noted the GS may have been long, or not violated things.

    Note the tiff half-way through: most of the "pundits" talking on this video formerly worked for GS.


  10. #10
    Thailand Expat
    panama hat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Last Online
    21-10-2023 @ 08:08 AM
    Location
    Way, Way South of the border now - thank God!
    Posts
    32,680
    Quote Originally Posted by Muadib
    Just in, Goldman has leaked information that they were actually invested long in the CDO's in question and were not shorting them, which is the contention of the SEC... This is a game-changer if proved correct...
    Quote Originally Posted by barbaro
    As noted above, it's noted the GS may have been long, or not violated things.
    Easy to miss in a two-year investigation . . . or easily to falsify records . . . nail the bastards to the wall . . . perfect: Wall Street

    Quote Originally Posted by Muadib
    The announcement is the result of a 2 year investigation by the SEC

  11. #11
    I am in Jail

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last Online
    22-11-2011 @ 08:27 AM
    Location
    Christian Country
    Posts
    15,017
    This is hilarious. Stupid investors saw the big $ signs and invested there when they knew nothing about the issue. Risk is inherent in the market, especially so in derivatives. If you do not understand the risk, then stay the fek away. The SEC has many regs in place, but when the crybabies lose, they run to their libbie policos to save them.

  12. #12
    I am in Jail
    Camel Toe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Last Online
    18-02-2017 @ 10:41 AM
    Location
    Guadalajara
    Posts
    3,717
    Goldman Sachs is recruiting for bodyguards but the candidates must be under 50 and no saggy boobs or squarsy arses. Too bad for you.

  13. #13
    Banned Muadib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    4,774
    Moody's is the one that will be next, as they are the ones that rated many of these CDO's as AAA when in fact they were in-part comprised of sub-prime mortgages...

    Investors place sufficient reliance on rating companies to gauge the strength of a security prior to investing... When the rating companies simply rubber-stamp AAA on a pile of poo, investors have no way to judge the risk of a financial instrument...

    It's been stated more than once that many of these CDO's were so complicated, that even a financial genius couldn't understand them... Alan Greenspan even made this comment in an interview...

    The SEC is on a witch hunt going after Paulson & GS since they can't go after Abacus, as they are now defunct...

  14. #14
    Banned Muadib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    4,774
    Seems Gordo is now on the bandwagon...

    BBC News - Goldman Sachs: Brown attacks firm's 'moral bankruptcy'

    Seems mighty thin to me... Even if the allegation is true against Paulson, how would GS know that Paulson held short position in the CDO portfolio???

    Charges

    On Friday, the SEC issued charges against Goldman and one of its London-based vice presidents, Fabrice Tourre.

    The SEC says Goldman failed to disclose "vital information" that one of its clients, Paulson & Co, helped choose which securities were packaged into the mortgage portfolio.

    These securities were sold to investors in 2007.

    But Goldman did not disclose that Paulson, one of the world's largest hedge funds, had bet that the value of the securities would fall.

    The SEC said: "Unbeknownst to investors, Paulson... which was posed to benefit if the [securities] defaulted, played a significant role in selecting which [securities] should make up the portfolio."

    "In sum, Goldman Sachs arranged a transaction at Paulson's request in which Paulson heavily influenced the selection of the portfolio to suit its economic interests," said the Commission.

  15. #15
    I am in Jail

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last Online
    22-11-2011 @ 08:27 AM
    Location
    Christian Country
    Posts
    15,017
    Anybody with a brain would know these securities would crash.

  16. #16
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    Quote Originally Posted by Muadib View Post
    Moody's is the one that will be next, as they are the ones that rated many of these CDO's as AAA when in fact they were in-part comprised of sub-prime mortgages...

    Investors place sufficient reliance on rating companies to gauge the strength of a security prior to investing... When the rating companies simply rubber-stamp AAA on a pile of poo, investors have no way to judge the risk of a financial instrument...
    Will there be any compensation paid to individuals, and governments, and any organizations that bought these?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •