Thread: koran, allah, and all things islam

Originally Posted by Sdigit

Fuck their cultural sensitivities, they chose to live in the UK

Yep, they chose to live there but your home office gave them the right to stay indefinitely. Stop moaning, will ya?

Originally Posted by machangezi

Originally Posted by Sdigit

they chose to live in the UK

Yep, they chose to live there but your home office gave them the right to stay indefinitely. Stop moaning, will ya?

Yes you are quite correct they were given the right to stay, that is not the point I'm taking issue with.

As I said before, they were not given the right to break UK laws or disrespect UK courts.

This is an important issue because it sets precedents, which is all part of their gradual erosion and undermining of UK law and society.

To simply say" Stop moaning will ya" and allow this to contiue is to give a free rein to these people to continue in this manner and for us to continue to allow it.

Originally Posted by Ant

Maybe you guys are simply ot answering in a way that keda finds acceptable?

He's looking for an answer that suits his idiotic agenda. Alas! He ain't gettin one.

^427^
Any chance of some summaries?

When it becomes compulsory to read everything everyone posts, do let me know and I'll decide if I wish to comply.

Originally Posted by keda

When it becomes compulsory to read everything everyone posts, do let me know and I'll decide if I wish to comply.

Well if you're going to be making informed comment, it may not be compulsory but surely it's requisite.


Oh wait, yeah I see what you're saying. Carry on regardless then, as you were.

Originally Posted by keda

When it becomes compulsory to read everything everyone posts, do let me know and I'll decide if I wish to comply.

Don't know about compulsory but if you have any pretensions to discussing or debating it is pretty essential to know what the others are saying. You do, after all, whinge on a number of threads about wanting debate and discussion. Oddly enough, when you get it you ignore it.

It's good that you admit that all you do is post cut'n'pastes of other people's writing and completely ignore anything that doesn't validate your opinion. That's what I thought you did but it's nice to see you finally bring it out into the open, "γνῶθι σεαυτόν" and all that.

Originally Posted by slackula

Jeebus al keda, is that the best you have? It seems like you aren't even trying, you just want to post up some scurrilous rubbish and have it accepted as gospel ( ) by everybody here?

Hi, you must be new here. Welcome to TD!

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by slackula

Jeebus al keda, is that the best you have? It seems like you aren't even trying, you just want to post up some scurrilous rubbish and have it accepted as gospel ( ) by everybody here?

Hi, you must be new here. Welcome to TD!

thanks, but it is pretty depressing to see people post up garbage like he does and then reject anything refuting it because it is simply too difficult to read or comprehend.

I don't use the ignore function much (well, except for you, but *everybody* does that right? ) , but I really can't see that there is any point responding to the drivel that al keda throws out; he can't even back it up himself FFS! All his posts and claims are comprehensively disproved and he responds with frothing at the mouth, ad hominem, or moving the goalposts.

What a hopeless muppet, I hope he feels safe under his undisclosed bed with his blankie!

Originally Posted by slackula

All his posts and claims are comprehensively disproved and he responds with frothing at the mouth, ad hominem, or moving the goalposts.

You may be new here but you're certainly a quick learner!

I don't use the ignore function much (well, except for you, but *everybody* does that right? )

Newb!

It’s wonderful that Roqaya al-Ghassra participated in the Olympic games dressed as she was, because the hijab is a choice, and it’s not about “religious dress” or oppression. It’s a decision about modesty, the same as wearing long sleeves instead of short or a high neckline instead of a plunging one. Her choice is not the same as mine – but it doesn’t have to be under Islam.

"Hijab is a choice"
Did she ever have a choice ? Growing up in a strict muslim family in a country under sharia law ?
A bright example for all future generations in track and freak.... aahemm field. Sorry.



Choice my ass:

The 20-year-old Ethiopian who represents Bahrain has raised the ire of a leading politician in the Gulf State for wearing a short sleeveless top and shorts.

Pictures of her wearing the outfit when winning the 3,000m at the Golden League meeting in Oslo last week have caused outrage in Bahrain. That performance installed Jamal as the favourite for the 1500m here in Holmes' absence.

Hamad Al Mohannadi, the chairman of Bahrain's parliamentary legislative committee, said: "We were all shocked by the look of the young woman . . . the outfit is not in any way related with the normal clothes Bahraini young women are accustomed to wearing."

Bahrain wanted to promote sport but within the "perimeters" of Islam. "It is disrespecting Islamic precepts and offending local values. We should not allow the good name of Bahrain to be abused," Al Mohannadi said. "The athlete should also be made aware of the indecency of her outfit."

Last year Bahrain's Ruqaya Al Ghasra ran the 100m at the Olympics with her legs and arms covered.

Congrat. Miss Al Ghasra, you had a CHOICE and remind me of those stooges of the Führer.

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

It’s wonderful that Roqaya al-Ghassra participated in the Olympic games dressed as she was, because the hijab is a choice, and it’s not about “religious dress” or oppression. It’s a decision about modesty, the same as wearing long sleeves instead of short or a high neckline instead of a plunging one. Her choice is not the same as mine – but it doesn’t have to be under Islam.

"Hijab is a choice"
Did she ever have a choice ? Growing up in a strict muslim family in a country under sharia law ?
A bright example for all future generations in track and freak.... aahemm field. Sorry.



Choice my ass:

The 20-year-old Ethiopian who represents Bahrain has raised the ire of a leading politician in the Gulf State for wearing a short sleeveless top and shorts.

Pictures of her wearing the outfit when winning the 3,000m at the Golden League meeting in Oslo last week have caused outrage in Bahrain. That performance installed Jamal as the favourite for the 1500m here in Holmes' absence.

Hamad Al Mohannadi, the chairman of Bahrain's parliamentary legislative committee, said: "We were all shocked by the look of the young woman . . . the outfit is not in any way related with the normal clothes Bahraini young women are accustomed to wearing."

Bahrain wanted to promote sport but within the "perimeters" of Islam. "It is disrespecting Islamic precepts and offending local values. We should not allow the good name of Bahrain to be abused," Al Mohannadi said. "The athlete should also be made aware of the indecency of her outfit."

Last year Bahrain's Ruqaya Al Ghasra ran the 100m at the Olympics with her legs and arms covered.

Congrat. Miss Al Ghasra, you had a CHOICE and remind me of those stooges of the Führer.

Originally Posted by Sdigit

they were not given the right to break UK laws or disrespect UK courts

If they have broken UK laws or disrespected UK courts chuck them back to mussie-estan and make an example out of them, end of story.

Macha, tell me this poor little girl is happy.

And what about the emote ? Showing your ass will not give more freedom for the womens living under islamic dictatorship.

Originally Posted by Wallalai

Macha, tell me this poor little girl is happy.

And what about the emote ? Showing your ass will not give more freedom for the womens living under islamic dictatorship.

Sure she's happy and sees whatever happens to her as perfectly normal. She knows no better, so when she's married or sold off to look after the needs of some old guy that beats her when the mood strikes (sic), this too is normal.

Having been weaned on Islam this is what she believes her life should be, and as a mother this is what she'll breed into her own children to perpetuate the repressive ideology.

She might / might not be happy, I don't know. Are those underage tarts walking the streets of Amsterdam happy? You want me to upload their photos so you can guess if they are happy?

Originally Posted by machangezi

She might / might not be happy, I don't know. Are those underage tarts walking the streets of Amsterdam happy?

guess so

Originally Posted by machangezi

You want me to upload their photos so you can guess if they are happy?

Yes please !

Wallali, do you think it's possible to judge (from a photograph) if she's happy or not? I have recently spoken to an eleven year old girl at a workshop who against the advise of her mother and father has chosen to wear hijab.

Originally Posted by machangezi

Wallali, do you think it's possible to judge (from a photograph) if she's happy or not? I have recently spoken to an eleven year old girl at a workshop who against the advise of her mother and father has chosen to wear hijab.

I guess she want her parents to get a good price/value.

Are those underage tarts walking the streets of Amsterdam happy?

Is this a criminal act or a western religious tradition?

Originally Posted by machangezi

Wallali, do you think it's possible to judge (from a photograph) if she's happy or not? I have recently spoken to an eleven year old girl at a workshop who against the advise of her mother and father has chosen to wear hijab.

Aren't you and your nephew the same guys that said it was your "right" to control the women in your families? Archaic thinking as it is an archaic religion.