"One man with courage makes a majority." -- Andrew Jackson
I think he's talking aoout GWB.
Printable View
"One man with courage makes a majority." -- Andrew Jackson
I think he's talking aoout GWB.
ok, but where is that majority ? on your little warship ?
You ever notice nobody is really doing anything but whining ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Butterfly
Or beating their chest and bragging........Quote:
Originally Posted by Storekeeper
Mr. Earl
You are free to send me reds. I have no problem with that.
But don't call me a "Michael Moore Zombie."
Michael is just a fim-maker. His journalism and presentation of some facts has been questions. Some of his points me agrees with, other of his, me not agree with.
Or, as one of the best Vice President's we've ever had said: Nattering Nabobs of Negavatism":rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Storekeeper
"Admiral Carey puts the boot into the U.S. Iraq skeptics: "Yet it certainly appears to me that we have men and women dying in Iraq and Afghanistan right now that in some instances are facing this danger because these enemy actions are being inadvertently encouraged by public statements made by some of their fellow citizens."
Finally ... a high ranking Flag Officer comes out and tells us what I've been telling you all along for a few years now ...
^ The insurgents are bogging the Yanks down.
One Yank dead today. Hopefully 127,000+ more will mee the same fate.
Do you really mean that or are you just frsutrated that nobody listens to you ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Milkman
If any of you care to read Bangkok post everyday you will know that America has already lost the war for OIL.......AHEM! I mean war on terrorism.
Why don't you all admit it??
Because it's not true. Did you know that Hizbollah is running out of weapons ? Did you know the US is rushing to re-supply Israel ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mhz
After Israel finishes off Hizbollah we're gonna let them fly right over Iraq and bomb the fuck out of Tehran.
^AMEN to that.I would love to see the YIDS or U.S.A attack Iran and you just answered your question about WW III.Quote:
Originally Posted by SK
It's nothing new SK tell me something that is new.Quote:
Originally Posted by SK
I would love to see both the USA and Israel bomb the fuck out of Iran ... but not invade. Problem solved ... and we could start pulling troops out of Iraq. Up unitl I've been against bombing Iran and wouldn't even think of the possibility that we would do it ... But GWB had the green light from me now ... I don't care if it means being put on operational hold and prevented from retiring.
If thats your opinion then this is my opinion in reply of your opinion.I would love to see Iran nuke Israel and wipe that God forsaken land off the map of the world.OOOOPPSS I just made my self a supporter of the terrorists.
But I dont give a Dirty Rat's ass.
The re-supplying of bombs to Israel is old news, SK.Quote:
Originally Posted by Storekeeper
Again, I am saying that the military actions are a temporary bandaid to a long term political solution.
Hizbollah is gettin 20-40 billion USD per month, and Israel is aided by the U.S.
Both sides are determined. This = continued conflict in the future because both sides (IMO) probably won't want to negotiate and make agreements for the long term. Only short term deals to let things settle, re-stock, prepare, and go at this again.
I think you know this won't happen. You're joshing. Bombing Iran, won't work. Everyone knows this.Quote:
After Israel finishes off Hizbollah we're gonna let them fly right over Iraq and bomb the fuck out of Tehran.
Tehran is also stronger than we know (and I'm not talking nukes).
This sentence ... just ... makes me go, Hmmmm ! Is your grey matter malfunctioning ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Milkman
Why is Tehran a terrorist or a threat to world security??
Can any American explain to me??I didn't see any Iranian strapping a bomb on his waste and blowing himself off with a bunch of (always innocent) civilians??I didn't see any Iranians name on the 9/11 hi-jackers list??
Got a short memory there?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mhz
Forgot about the US Marine Barracks in Lebonon blown up in '83?
Unprovoked I might add?...
Lebonan??
I may have a short memory but I think you have a reading problem.I said Iran not Lebonan.
1 + 1 = Iran ... they funded Hizbollah then and they fund them now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mhz
That clown who is the President of Iran needs to be assassinated.
Okay so anyone who helps others to defend themselves needs to be assassinated??
What about the clown in the white house??
So you wanna bomb Iran because Hisbollah attacked an army barracks in 1983???Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
- pathetic.:rolleyes:
These reasons doesn't make Iran a terrorist or a threat to world security.
What about the Saudi hi-jackers who attacked WTC??
Why isn't America worried about the Saudi's??
I mean they were the one's to attack WTC.
1. He hasn't helped anybody defend themselves. But he has helped Hizbollah attack.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mhz
2. The US hasn't had a clown in the Presidency since Carter was ran off.
I would pretty much say we are hunting down any of the Saudi terrorists who make their way to either Iraq or Afghanistan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mhz
No, y'all on the bleedin'-heart left are the pathetic ones.Quote:
Originally Posted by stroller
Ferget about the I-ranian Embassy hostage crisis?
We had a real lame president at that time though...:mad:
I am sure that must be a real relief to him......Quote:
Originally Posted by Storekeeper
Ah, so the present Iran gov is responsible for the hostage crisis?:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
And I haven't spotted any "bleedin'-heart left" here, only a few short remarks from yourself lacking logic and reason.
Uh....Headmaster sTroll...have you listened to the news or picked up a paper in the last year or so? Are you not aware the the current president of I-ran was one of the hostage-takers, eh? Proven fact his mug-shot matches no matter what y'all on the bleedin'-heart left say!:DQuote:
Originally Posted by stroller
Do you need to attack Iran 26 years later because of this?
Has he killed someone then?
So the president of Iran is a patriot? What's wrong with that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
So taking hostages is justified by Patriots ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Marmite the Dog
sure, look at GITMO
Do you know what GITMO means ? I use it all the time short for Guantanamo Bay ... but it really isn't what the acronym is short for.Quote:
Originally Posted by Butterfly
It is actually short for "Get Motivated" ... not a concept you can relate to I know.
Your powers of reasoning are slipping even faster than before there Butterfly. GITMO is populated by enemy combatents, not hostages. Big difference there bud, but I suspect you're trolling here again since your nick in the Bearpit has been blown!:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Butterfly
I read this somewhere, but the pictures I saw were not really convincing. I mean, a grainy 30 year old photo of a bearded Iranian student compared to a middleaged bearded politician of today....?Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
You may be right, but has this been actually confirmed? Not that it really matters - the US president is a convicted fellon, an alcoholic and a cocain snorter, so let him without sin throw the first stone, I say.....
They are accused of being "enemy combatants", but in fact, many of them have been kidnapped.Quote:
GITMO is populated by enemy combatents, not hostages.
Captured on the field of battle...:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by stroller
How come you aren't concerned about the 500+ we have sequestered for a couple of years in other locations like Iraq ?Quote:
Originally Posted by stroller
You haven't got a clue what's really going on.
I didn't know Cairo and Indonesia are battle fields these days... :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
I was responding to a comment about GITMO. Start reading before posting.:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Storekeeper